重新审视的管理

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Farahnak Assadi, Nakysa Hooman, Abdolhassan Seyedzadeh, Anoush Azarfar, Rad Elaheh Malakan, Behnaz Bazargani, Arash Abasi, Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Afshin Safaeiasl, Nasrin Esfandiar, Ali Derakhsan, Hamidreza Badeli, Alireza Eskandarifar, Mojgan Mazaheri, Fatemeh Ghane Sharbaf
{"title":"重新审视的管理","authors":"Farahnak Assadi, Nakysa Hooman, Abdolhassan Seyedzadeh, Anoush Azarfar, Rad Elaheh Malakan, Behnaz Bazargani, Arash Abasi, Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Afshin Safaeiasl, Nasrin Esfandiar, Ali Derakhsan, Hamidreza Badeli, Alireza Eskandarifar, Mojgan Mazaheri, Fatemeh Ghane Sharbaf","doi":"10.52547/ijkd.7179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The newest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommendations were investigated mainly for the care of adult kidney transplant recipients, but no guideline exists for the management of pediatric transplant recipients. This review provides update recommendations in the management of pediatric kidney transplantation. Four electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched systematically for the last two decades, using Mesh terms in English language. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for grading the quality of the overall evidence and the strength of recommendations for each outcome across the studies. The overall quality of evidence categorized as high (A), moderate (B), low (C), or poor (D). The strength of a recommendation was determined as level 1 (recommended) or level 2 (suggested). The ungraded statements were determined on the basis of common sense to provide general advice. Of the 317 citations which were screened for the evidence review, 62 were included in data extraction. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts and cross-sectional, descriptive, and review studies. Of the 115 statements, 56 (48.6%) were graded 1 (we recommend), 34 (29.5%) were graded 2 (we suggest), and 25 (21.7%) were ungraded statements. Altogether, only 22 (19.1%) of recommendations reached the \"A\" or \"B\" levels of quality of evidence. The pediatric kidney transplant recipients are different from adult recipients regarding the primary kidney diseases, surgical techniques, drug metabolism, adherence to medications, growth and neurocognitive development and immunization needs prior to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":"16 6","pages":"319-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplants, A Multicenter Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Farahnak Assadi, Nakysa Hooman, Abdolhassan Seyedzadeh, Anoush Azarfar, Rad Elaheh Malakan, Behnaz Bazargani, Arash Abasi, Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Afshin Safaeiasl, Nasrin Esfandiar, Ali Derakhsan, Hamidreza Badeli, Alireza Eskandarifar, Mojgan Mazaheri, Fatemeh Ghane Sharbaf\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/ijkd.7179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The newest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommendations were investigated mainly for the care of adult kidney transplant recipients, but no guideline exists for the management of pediatric transplant recipients. This review provides update recommendations in the management of pediatric kidney transplantation. Four electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched systematically for the last two decades, using Mesh terms in English language. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for grading the quality of the overall evidence and the strength of recommendations for each outcome across the studies. The overall quality of evidence categorized as high (A), moderate (B), low (C), or poor (D). The strength of a recommendation was determined as level 1 (recommended) or level 2 (suggested). The ungraded statements were determined on the basis of common sense to provide general advice. Of the 317 citations which were screened for the evidence review, 62 were included in data extraction. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts and cross-sectional, descriptive, and review studies. Of the 115 statements, 56 (48.6%) were graded 1 (we recommend), 34 (29.5%) were graded 2 (we suggest), and 25 (21.7%) were ungraded statements. Altogether, only 22 (19.1%) of recommendations reached the \\\"A\\\" or \\\"B\\\" levels of quality of evidence. The pediatric kidney transplant recipients are different from adult recipients regarding the primary kidney diseases, surgical techniques, drug metabolism, adherence to medications, growth and neurocognitive development and immunization needs prior to transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"319-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijkd.7179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijkd.7179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最新肾脏疾病改善全球预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplants, A Multicenter Analysis

The newest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommendations were investigated mainly for the care of adult kidney transplant recipients, but no guideline exists for the management of pediatric transplant recipients. This review provides update recommendations in the management of pediatric kidney transplantation. Four electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched systematically for the last two decades, using Mesh terms in English language. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for grading the quality of the overall evidence and the strength of recommendations for each outcome across the studies. The overall quality of evidence categorized as high (A), moderate (B), low (C), or poor (D). The strength of a recommendation was determined as level 1 (recommended) or level 2 (suggested). The ungraded statements were determined on the basis of common sense to provide general advice. Of the 317 citations which were screened for the evidence review, 62 were included in data extraction. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts and cross-sectional, descriptive, and review studies. Of the 115 statements, 56 (48.6%) were graded 1 (we recommend), 34 (29.5%) were graded 2 (we suggest), and 25 (21.7%) were ungraded statements. Altogether, only 22 (19.1%) of recommendations reached the "A" or "B" levels of quality of evidence. The pediatric kidney transplant recipients are different from adult recipients regarding the primary kidney diseases, surgical techniques, drug metabolism, adherence to medications, growth and neurocognitive development and immunization needs prior to transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian journal of kidney diseases
Iranian journal of kidney diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信