反黑人轴心:重新思考种族三角划分

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Elizabeth Jordie Davies
{"title":"反黑人轴心:重新思考种族三角划分","authors":"Elizabeth Jordie Davies","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2022.2055481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this essay, I argue that the “insider/ foreigner” vector of racial triangulation misnames the Black American experience and obscures the fraught nature of Black American citizenship. Though Kim [1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society.27 (1): 105–138, Kim, Claire Jean. 2000. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York City. Yale University Press] recognizes that the insider status of Black Americans is constructed on foundations of anti-Blackness, I argue that we must actively name anti-Blackness as the organizing principle of US politics. This more accurately describes the racial hierarchy in the US, given the way so-called foreign populations are evaluated based on their perceived proximity to Blackness, their ability to appeal to whiteness, and their culture compared to Black Americans. I argue that racialization could be productively understood through sites of white supremacist harm – from the carceral state to restrictive immigration policies. Politically, we can more adequately resist the common problem of white supremacy by lending cross-racial support to the systemic struggles that Black, Asian, and Latinx groups face in the US. This perspective decenters proximity to whiteness, emphasizes the proximity of Black and Asian Americans, and reveals opportunities to build solidarity.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"45 1","pages":"475 - 480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anti-Black axis: rethinking racial triangulation\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Jordie Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21565503.2022.2055481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this essay, I argue that the “insider/ foreigner” vector of racial triangulation misnames the Black American experience and obscures the fraught nature of Black American citizenship. Though Kim [1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society.27 (1): 105–138, Kim, Claire Jean. 2000. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York City. Yale University Press] recognizes that the insider status of Black Americans is constructed on foundations of anti-Blackness, I argue that we must actively name anti-Blackness as the organizing principle of US politics. This more accurately describes the racial hierarchy in the US, given the way so-called foreign populations are evaluated based on their perceived proximity to Blackness, their ability to appeal to whiteness, and their culture compared to Black Americans. I argue that racialization could be productively understood through sites of white supremacist harm – from the carceral state to restrictive immigration policies. Politically, we can more adequately resist the common problem of white supremacy by lending cross-racial support to the systemic struggles that Black, Asian, and Latinx groups face in the US. This perspective decenters proximity to whiteness, emphasizes the proximity of Black and Asian Americans, and reveals opportunities to build solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"475 - 480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2055481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2055481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为种族三角测量的“局内人/外国人”向量错误地命名了美国黑人的经历,模糊了美国黑人公民身份令人担忧的本质。虽然金[1999]。“亚裔美国人的种族三角测量”。[杨建军。2008 .政治与社会。27 (1):105-138 .]苦果:纽约黑人与朝鲜冲突的政治。耶鲁大学出版社]认识到美国黑人的内部地位是建立在反黑人的基础上的,我认为我们必须积极地将反黑人作为美国政治的组织原则。这更准确地描述了美国的种族等级制度,因为所谓的外国人口是根据他们与黑人的接近程度、他们吸引白人的能力以及他们与美国黑人相比的文化来评估的。我认为,种族化可以通过白人至上主义者的伤害——从奴隶制国家到限制性移民政策——得到有效的理解。在政治上,我们可以通过跨种族支持美国黑人、亚裔和拉丁裔群体面临的系统性斗争,更充分地抵制白人至上的共同问题。这种观点淡化了对白人的接近性,强调了黑人和亚裔美国人的接近性,并揭示了建立团结的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The anti-Black axis: rethinking racial triangulation
ABSTRACT In this essay, I argue that the “insider/ foreigner” vector of racial triangulation misnames the Black American experience and obscures the fraught nature of Black American citizenship. Though Kim [1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society.27 (1): 105–138, Kim, Claire Jean. 2000. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York City. Yale University Press] recognizes that the insider status of Black Americans is constructed on foundations of anti-Blackness, I argue that we must actively name anti-Blackness as the organizing principle of US politics. This more accurately describes the racial hierarchy in the US, given the way so-called foreign populations are evaluated based on their perceived proximity to Blackness, their ability to appeal to whiteness, and their culture compared to Black Americans. I argue that racialization could be productively understood through sites of white supremacist harm – from the carceral state to restrictive immigration policies. Politically, we can more adequately resist the common problem of white supremacy by lending cross-racial support to the systemic struggles that Black, Asian, and Latinx groups face in the US. This perspective decenters proximity to whiteness, emphasizes the proximity of Black and Asian Americans, and reveals opportunities to build solidarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信