乔叟的《致钱包》:求还是别求?

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
R. F. Yeager
{"title":"乔叟的《致钱包》:求还是别求?","authors":"R. F. Yeager","doi":"10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.300016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chaucer’s “To His Purse”: Begging, or Begging Off? R. F. YEAGER. The short “Complaint of Chaucer to His Purse” has received attention formally as the origin of the “begging poem” genre in English, and historically as the only evidence of Chaucer’s acceptance of the usurpation of Henry IV. Both lines of assessment converge, in that, as the traditional readings have it, Chaucer was in dire financial straits in 1399, and wrote the new ruler a clever bit of flattery, ultimately restating Henry’s own various claims to the crown, for which he was rewarded monetarily. This article argues that, on the contrary, far from acquiescing to the Lancastrian take-over, Chaucer put “To His Purse” together under some duress from Henry’s court, which, in order to bolster its tenuous claims, demonstrably sought supportive expressions from important literary figures including Gower and Christine de Pisan; that Chaucer was not in serious debt in 1399; that it is highly possible all of “To His Purse” except the envoy was writte...","PeriodicalId":39588,"journal":{"name":"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chaucer's 'To His Purse': Begging, or Begging Off?\",\"authors\":\"R. F. Yeager\",\"doi\":\"10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.300016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chaucer’s “To His Purse”: Begging, or Begging Off? R. F. YEAGER. The short “Complaint of Chaucer to His Purse” has received attention formally as the origin of the “begging poem” genre in English, and historically as the only evidence of Chaucer’s acceptance of the usurpation of Henry IV. Both lines of assessment converge, in that, as the traditional readings have it, Chaucer was in dire financial straits in 1399, and wrote the new ruler a clever bit of flattery, ultimately restating Henry’s own various claims to the crown, for which he was rewarded monetarily. This article argues that, on the contrary, far from acquiescing to the Lancastrian take-over, Chaucer put “To His Purse” together under some duress from Henry’s court, which, in order to bolster its tenuous claims, demonstrably sought supportive expressions from important literary figures including Gower and Christine de Pisan; that Chaucer was not in serious debt in 1399; that it is highly possible all of “To His Purse” except the envoy was writte...\",\"PeriodicalId\":39588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.300016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.300016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

乔叟的《致钱袋》:求还是别求?r·f·耶格尔。这首短小的《乔叟对钱包的抱怨》正式受到关注,因为它是英语“乞讨诗”体裁的起源,从历史上看,它是乔叟接受亨利四世篡夺王位的唯一证据。两种评价的共同点是,按照传统解读,乔叟在1399年陷入了严重的财政困境,他给新统治者写了一些巧妙的奉承,最终重申了亨利自己对王位的各种要求。为此他得到了金钱上的奖励。本文认为,恰恰相反,乔叟并没有默许兰开斯特家族的接管,而是在亨利宫廷的某种胁迫下创作了《到他的钱包去》。亨利宫廷为了支持其脆弱的主张,显然寻求了包括高尔和克里斯汀·德·皮桑在内的重要文学人物的支持;1399年,乔叟并没有负债累累;很有可能所有的“致他的钱包”除了使者是写…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chaucer's 'To His Purse': Begging, or Begging Off?
Chaucer’s “To His Purse”: Begging, or Begging Off? R. F. YEAGER. The short “Complaint of Chaucer to His Purse” has received attention formally as the origin of the “begging poem” genre in English, and historically as the only evidence of Chaucer’s acceptance of the usurpation of Henry IV. Both lines of assessment converge, in that, as the traditional readings have it, Chaucer was in dire financial straits in 1399, and wrote the new ruler a clever bit of flattery, ultimately restating Henry’s own various claims to the crown, for which he was rewarded monetarily. This article argues that, on the contrary, far from acquiescing to the Lancastrian take-over, Chaucer put “To His Purse” together under some duress from Henry’s court, which, in order to bolster its tenuous claims, demonstrably sought supportive expressions from important literary figures including Gower and Christine de Pisan; that Chaucer was not in serious debt in 1399; that it is highly possible all of “To His Purse” except the envoy was writte...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies
Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信