用分数来衡量供应链敏捷性的表现。

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.33536/jiem.v8i2.1465

Taufik Immawan

{"title":"用分数来衡量供应链敏捷性的表现。","authors":"Taufik Immawan","doi":"10.33536/jiem.v8i2.1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to measure the supply chain performance aspects of Agility and provide suggestions for improving performance of Agility. In this research, the methodology used is the design and assessment of supply chain performance based on the SCOR 12.0 model to identify supply chain performance indicators with subjective (personal) and objective (data) field approaches and process adjustments was adjusted. The use of AHP results is weighted for each process, process category and performance indicators. The result of the design of supply chain performance appraisal is that there are 9 performance indicators that are grouped into 3 main business processes, namely: source, make and deliver. The scoring system uses the Snorm de Bour normalization process which is analyzed by a Traffic Light System for priority improvement. The result of the performance appraisal and weighting are in the good category with a value of 80,26 for the March 2019 period. There are 4 performance indicators that get yellow so that improvements are needed in the process, namely: Additional Source Volumes Obtained in 30 days, Current Source Volume, Current Make Volume, Current Delivery Volume.","PeriodicalId":38526,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF AGILITY IN SUPPLY CHAIN USING SCOR.\",\"authors\":\"Taufik Immawan\",\"doi\":\"10.33536/jiem.v8i2.1465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to measure the supply chain performance aspects of Agility and provide suggestions for improving performance of Agility. In this research, the methodology used is the design and assessment of supply chain performance based on the SCOR 12.0 model to identify supply chain performance indicators with subjective (personal) and objective (data) field approaches and process adjustments was adjusted. The use of AHP results is weighted for each process, process category and performance indicators. The result of the design of supply chain performance appraisal is that there are 9 performance indicators that are grouped into 3 main business processes, namely: source, make and deliver. The scoring system uses the Snorm de Bour normalization process which is analyzed by a Traffic Light System for priority improvement. The result of the performance appraisal and weighting are in the good category with a value of 80,26 for the March 2019 period. There are 4 performance indicators that get yellow so that improvements are needed in the process, namely: Additional Source Volumes Obtained in 30 days, Current Source Volume, Current Make Volume, Current Delivery Volume.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33536/jiem.v8i2.1465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33536/jiem.v8i2.1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在衡量敏捷性的供应链绩效方面，并提供改进敏捷性绩效的建议。本研究采用基于SCOR 12.0模型的供应链绩效设计与评估方法，通过主观(个人)和客观(数据)领域的方法确定供应链绩效指标，并对流程进行调整。AHP结果的使用对每个过程、过程类别和绩效指标进行加权。供应链绩效评估设计的结果是，有9个绩效指标，分为3个主要业务流程，即:来源、制造和交付。评分系统采用斯诺姆德小时标准化过程，并通过交通灯系统分析优先级改进。2019年3月期间的绩效评估和权重结果为良好，值为80,26。有4个性能指标变为黄色，说明流程中需要改进，分别是:30天内获得的额外源量、当前源量、当前制造量、当前交付量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF AGILITY IN SUPPLY CHAIN USING SCOR.

This study aims to measure the supply chain performance aspects of Agility and provide suggestions for improving performance of Agility. In this research, the methodology used is the design and assessment of supply chain performance based on the SCOR 12.0 model to identify supply chain performance indicators with subjective (personal) and objective (data) field approaches and process adjustments was adjusted. The use of AHP results is weighted for each process, process category and performance indicators. The result of the design of supply chain performance appraisal is that there are 9 performance indicators that are grouped into 3 main business processes, namely: source, make and deliver. The scoring system uses the Snorm de Bour normalization process which is analyzed by a Traffic Light System for priority improvement. The result of the performance appraisal and weighting are in the good category with a value of 80,26 for the March 2019 period. There are 4 performance indicators that get yellow so that improvements are needed in the process, namely: Additional Source Volumes Obtained in 30 days, Current Source Volume, Current Make Volume, Current Delivery Volume.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

17.20%

发文量

审稿时长

21 weeks

期刊介绍： International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM) is an interdisciplinary international academic journal published quarterly. IJIEM serves researchers in the industrial engineering, manufacturing engineering and management fields. The major aims are: To collect and disseminate information on new and advanced developments in the field of industrial engineering and management; To encourage further progress in engineering and management methodology and applications; To cover the range of engineering and management development and usage in their use of managerial policies and strategies. Thus, IJIEM invites the submission of original, high quality, theoretical and application-oriented research; general surveys and critical reviews; educational or training articles including case studies, in the field of industrial engineering and management. The journal covers all aspects of industrial engineering and management, particularly: -Smart Manufacturing & Industry 4.0, -Production Systems, -Service Engineering, -Automation, Robotics and Mechatronics, -Information and Communication Systems, -ICT for Collaborative Manufacturing, -Quality, Maintenance and Logistics, -Safety and Reliability, -Organization and Human Resources, -Engineering Management, -Entrepreneurship and Innovation, -Project Management, -Marketing and Commerce, -Investment, Finance and Accounting, -Insurance Engineering and Management, -Media Engineering and Management, -Education and Practices in Industrial Engineering and Management.