供应链管理领域还能更关键吗?用关键的管理研究建立新的桥梁

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
E. Paiva, Rafael Alcadipani, K. Freitas, L. Sincorá, Arun Abraham Elias
{"title":"供应链管理领域还能更关键吗?用关键的管理研究建立新的桥梁","authors":"E. Paiva, Rafael Alcadipani, K. Freitas, L. Sincorá, Arun Abraham Elias","doi":"10.1108/scm-02-2023-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how three core elements of critical management studies (CMSs), “de-naturalisation”, “reflexivity” and “(non)-performative intent”, can help expand the current debate in the supply chain management (SCM) field.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors used a systematic literature review to select 103 articles published in 12 high-ranking journals in the SCM field based on the Academic Journal Guide of the Chartered Association of Business Schools.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of this study suggest that SCM studies can be narrowed down into four major CMSs themes: “power”, “ethics and environmental issues”, “diversity” and “working conditions”, but even these themes are still under-discussed and undertheorized in SCM. The literature the authors reviewed is more concerned with explaining these phenomena than questioning them and proposing new agendas. This paper, therefore, will discuss how these three core elements of CMS can help transform the “hidden” issues of SCM, which it will do by illustrating it in the context of buyer–supplier relationships and lean manufacturing.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research will encourage SCM scholars who are interested in conducting more critical studies and teaching the harmful effects of global supply chains.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper highlights that a combination of SCM and CMS approaches is important when we decide to adopt a more critical “constructive” view of supply chain challenges and engage practical and critical views, respectively, to generate knowledge that not only increases (corporate) performance but also highlights social needs and values.\n","PeriodicalId":43857,"journal":{"name":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the supply chain management field be more critical? Building new bridges with critical management studies\",\"authors\":\"E. Paiva, Rafael Alcadipani, K. Freitas, L. Sincorá, Arun Abraham Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/scm-02-2023-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how three core elements of critical management studies (CMSs), “de-naturalisation”, “reflexivity” and “(non)-performative intent”, can help expand the current debate in the supply chain management (SCM) field.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors used a systematic literature review to select 103 articles published in 12 high-ranking journals in the SCM field based on the Academic Journal Guide of the Chartered Association of Business Schools.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings of this study suggest that SCM studies can be narrowed down into four major CMSs themes: “power”, “ethics and environmental issues”, “diversity” and “working conditions”, but even these themes are still under-discussed and undertheorized in SCM. The literature the authors reviewed is more concerned with explaining these phenomena than questioning them and proposing new agendas. This paper, therefore, will discuss how these three core elements of CMS can help transform the “hidden” issues of SCM, which it will do by illustrating it in the context of buyer–supplier relationships and lean manufacturing.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis research will encourage SCM scholars who are interested in conducting more critical studies and teaching the harmful effects of global supply chains.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper highlights that a combination of SCM and CMS approaches is important when we decide to adopt a more critical “constructive” view of supply chain challenges and engage practical and critical views, respectively, to generate knowledge that not only increases (corporate) performance but also highlights social needs and values.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2023-0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2023-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是调查关键管理研究(cms)的三个核心要素,“去自然化”,“反思性”和“(非)执行意图”,如何有助于扩大当前在供应链管理(SCM)领域的辩论。设计/方法/方法作者采用系统的文献综述方法,根据特许商学院协会的学术期刊指南,选择了在SCM领域12个高级期刊上发表的103篇文章。本研究的结果表明,供应链管理研究可以缩小到四个主要的供应链管理主题:“权力”,“伦理和环境问题”,“多样性”和“工作条件”,但即使这些主题在供应链管理中仍然没有得到充分的讨论和理论化。作者回顾的文献更关注于解释这些现象,而不是质疑它们并提出新的议程。因此,本文将讨论CMS的这三个核心元素如何帮助转变SCM的“隐藏”问题,它将通过在买方-供应商关系和精益制造的背景下说明它来实现。实际意义本研究将鼓励有兴趣进行更多批判性研究和教授全球供应链有害影响的供应链管理学者。原创性/价值本文强调,当我们决定采用更具批判性的“建设性”的供应链挑战观点,并分别采用实际的和批判性的观点时,SCM和CMS方法的结合是重要的,以产生不仅增加(公司)绩效,而且突出社会需求和价值的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the supply chain management field be more critical? Building new bridges with critical management studies
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how three core elements of critical management studies (CMSs), “de-naturalisation”, “reflexivity” and “(non)-performative intent”, can help expand the current debate in the supply chain management (SCM) field. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a systematic literature review to select 103 articles published in 12 high-ranking journals in the SCM field based on the Academic Journal Guide of the Chartered Association of Business Schools. Findings The findings of this study suggest that SCM studies can be narrowed down into four major CMSs themes: “power”, “ethics and environmental issues”, “diversity” and “working conditions”, but even these themes are still under-discussed and undertheorized in SCM. The literature the authors reviewed is more concerned with explaining these phenomena than questioning them and proposing new agendas. This paper, therefore, will discuss how these three core elements of CMS can help transform the “hidden” issues of SCM, which it will do by illustrating it in the context of buyer–supplier relationships and lean manufacturing. Practical implications This research will encourage SCM scholars who are interested in conducting more critical studies and teaching the harmful effects of global supply chains. Originality/value This paper highlights that a combination of SCM and CMS approaches is important when we decide to adopt a more critical “constructive” view of supply chain challenges and engage practical and critical views, respectively, to generate knowledge that not only increases (corporate) performance but also highlights social needs and values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
27.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信