R. E. Cassens, John P. Young, J. Greenan, James M. Brown
{"title":"与教飞行员航空决策有关的要素","authors":"R. E. Cassens, John P. Young, J. Greenan, James M. Brown","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has placed increasing emphasis on aeronautical decision making (ADM) instruction, and it is critical that flight training schools ensure that their students are meeting and exceeding these requirements, especially since it has been shown that training in ADM can reduce the amount of errors caused by poor decision making (Berlin et al., 1982; Buch & Diehl, 1984; Buch, Lawton, & Livack, 1987; Connolly & Blackwell, 1989; Telfer, 1989). The goal of this study was to determine the status of ADM training at a collegiate flight training school and if there was any need for program improvement. Two surveys were used to define the ADM training environment. One survey was designed to determine the methods that professors believe should be used to teach ADM and the elements of ADM that should be included in instruction. A second survey focused on identifying methods and elements that were currently being used by flight instructors. The results of the surveys were then compared to determine if there were significant differences between what professors of aviation believed should be taught and what flight instructors were actually teaching in regards to ADM. The findings suggest that instructors were not consistently using the types of situations that allow students to practice decision making, nor were they consistently emphasizing the different types of elements that contribute to good decision making. Recommendations based on this research included: (a) analyzing the nature of ADM-related instruction at other collegiate flight training schools using similar methodology, (b) providing additional ADM-related ground and flight instruction, (c) determining the students’ perceptions of ADM instruction in the aircraft, and (d) adapting lesson plans to provide additional/more effective opportunities for students to practice ADM.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"10-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elements Related to Teaching Pilots Aeronautical Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"R. E. Cassens, John P. Young, J. Greenan, James M. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has placed increasing emphasis on aeronautical decision making (ADM) instruction, and it is critical that flight training schools ensure that their students are meeting and exceeding these requirements, especially since it has been shown that training in ADM can reduce the amount of errors caused by poor decision making (Berlin et al., 1982; Buch & Diehl, 1984; Buch, Lawton, & Livack, 1987; Connolly & Blackwell, 1989; Telfer, 1989). The goal of this study was to determine the status of ADM training at a collegiate flight training school and if there was any need for program improvement. Two surveys were used to define the ADM training environment. One survey was designed to determine the methods that professors believe should be used to teach ADM and the elements of ADM that should be included in instruction. A second survey focused on identifying methods and elements that were currently being used by flight instructors. The results of the surveys were then compared to determine if there were significant differences between what professors of aviation believed should be taught and what flight instructors were actually teaching in regards to ADM. The findings suggest that instructors were not consistently using the types of situations that allow students to practice decision making, nor were they consistently emphasizing the different types of elements that contribute to good decision making. Recommendations based on this research included: (a) analyzing the nature of ADM-related instruction at other collegiate flight training schools using similar methodology, (b) providing additional ADM-related ground and flight instruction, (c) determining the students’ perceptions of ADM instruction in the aircraft, and (d) adapting lesson plans to provide additional/more effective opportunities for students to practice ADM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegiate Aviation Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"10-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegiate Aviation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)越来越重视航空决策(ADM)教学,飞行培训学校确保学生达到并超过这些要求是至关重要的,特别是因为已有研究表明,ADM培训可以减少由于糟糕的决策而导致的错误数量(Berlin et al., 1982;Buch & Diehl, 1984;布赫,劳顿和利瓦克,1987;Connolly & Blackwell, 1989;电动高架索道,1989)。本研究的目的是确定一所大学飞行训练学校的ADM训练现状,以及是否有任何需要改进的项目。两个调查被用来定义ADM培训环境。一项调查旨在确定教授们认为应该用来教授ADM的方法,以及教学中应该包含的ADM元素。第二项调查的重点是确定飞行教官目前正在使用的方法和要素。然后对调查结果进行比较,以确定在航空教授认为应该教授的内容与飞行教官实际教授的内容之间是否存在显着差异。调查结果表明,教官并没有始终使用允许学生练习决策的情况类型,也没有始终强调有助于良好决策的不同类型的元素。基于这项研究的建议包括:(a)使用类似的方法分析其他大学飞行训练学校ADM相关教学的性质;(b)提供额外的ADM相关地面和飞行教学;(c)确定学生对飞机上ADM教学的看法;(d)调整课程计划,为学生提供更多/更有效的实践ADM的机会。
Elements Related to Teaching Pilots Aeronautical Decision Making
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has placed increasing emphasis on aeronautical decision making (ADM) instruction, and it is critical that flight training schools ensure that their students are meeting and exceeding these requirements, especially since it has been shown that training in ADM can reduce the amount of errors caused by poor decision making (Berlin et al., 1982; Buch & Diehl, 1984; Buch, Lawton, & Livack, 1987; Connolly & Blackwell, 1989; Telfer, 1989). The goal of this study was to determine the status of ADM training at a collegiate flight training school and if there was any need for program improvement. Two surveys were used to define the ADM training environment. One survey was designed to determine the methods that professors believe should be used to teach ADM and the elements of ADM that should be included in instruction. A second survey focused on identifying methods and elements that were currently being used by flight instructors. The results of the surveys were then compared to determine if there were significant differences between what professors of aviation believed should be taught and what flight instructors were actually teaching in regards to ADM. The findings suggest that instructors were not consistently using the types of situations that allow students to practice decision making, nor were they consistently emphasizing the different types of elements that contribute to good decision making. Recommendations based on this research included: (a) analyzing the nature of ADM-related instruction at other collegiate flight training schools using similar methodology, (b) providing additional ADM-related ground and flight instruction, (c) determining the students’ perceptions of ADM instruction in the aircraft, and (d) adapting lesson plans to provide additional/more effective opportunities for students to practice ADM.