“奥地利学派”标签的起源:卡尔·门格尔的思想

Q4 Social Sciences
Neelkant S. Chamilall
{"title":"“奥地利学派”标签的起源:卡尔·门格尔的思想","authors":"Neelkant S. Chamilall","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ce papier soutient que lindiscipline paradigmatique qui caracterise leconomie Autrichienne contemporaine pourrait etre effacee si les economistes Autrichiens prenaient en consideration lunite doctrinale de Carl Menger dans son essai de construire une theorie subjectiviste des institutions. Construite sur une ontologie et une epistemologie aristotelicienne assortie d une methodologie subjectiviste, lanalyse mengerienne des institutions economiques est le point culminant de sa pensee. Ne cherchant ni lequilibration, ni la coordination, limage mengerienne de leconomie est celle de relations complexes qui emergent au travers de sequences infinies de processus dechange. Larticle conclut en suggerant que le progres soit reconnu comme la norme par les economistes Autrichiens.This paper argues that the paradigmatic indiscipline that characterizes contemporary Austrian Economics can be smoothed out if Austrian economists appreciate the doctrinal unity of Carl Mengers attempt to construct a subjectivist theory of institutions. Building on an Aristotelian ontology and epistemology coupled with a subjectivist methodology, Mengers analysis of economic institutions is the culminating point of his thought. Neither equilibrating, nor coordinating, Mengers image of the economy is that of complex relationships emerging through unending sequences of exchange processes. The paper concludes by suggesting that progress be acknowledged as the norm by Austrian economists.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Genesis of the 'Austrian' Label: Carl Menger's Thought\",\"authors\":\"Neelkant S. Chamilall\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1145-6396.1162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ce papier soutient que lindiscipline paradigmatique qui caracterise leconomie Autrichienne contemporaine pourrait etre effacee si les economistes Autrichiens prenaient en consideration lunite doctrinale de Carl Menger dans son essai de construire une theorie subjectiviste des institutions. Construite sur une ontologie et une epistemologie aristotelicienne assortie d une methodologie subjectiviste, lanalyse mengerienne des institutions economiques est le point culminant de sa pensee. Ne cherchant ni lequilibration, ni la coordination, limage mengerienne de leconomie est celle de relations complexes qui emergent au travers de sequences infinies de processus dechange. Larticle conclut en suggerant que le progres soit reconnu comme la norme par les economistes Autrichiens.This paper argues that the paradigmatic indiscipline that characterizes contemporary Austrian Economics can be smoothed out if Austrian economists appreciate the doctrinal unity of Carl Mengers attempt to construct a subjectivist theory of institutions. Building on an Aristotelian ontology and epistemology coupled with a subjectivist methodology, Mengers analysis of economic institutions is the culminating point of his thought. Neither equilibrating, nor coordinating, Mengers image of the economy is that of complex relationships emerging through unending sequences of exchange processes. The paper concludes by suggesting that progress be acknowledged as the norm by Austrian economists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,如果奥地利经济学家在试图构建主观主义制度理论时考虑到卡尔·门格尔(Carl Menger)的教条主义lunite,当代奥地利经济学的范式学科就可以被消除。孟格尔对经济制度的分析以亚里士多德的本体论和认识论为基础,以主观主义的方法论为基础,是他思想的高潮。孟格尔对经济的描述既不寻求平衡,也不寻求协调,而是通过无限序列的变化过程而产生的复杂关系。这篇文章的结论是,进步应该被奥地利经济学家视为常态。这篇论文认为,如果奥地利经济学家承认卡尔·门格斯(Carl Mengers)试图构建一种主观主义制度理论的教义统一,那么当代奥地利经济学的范式无纪律特征就可以被消除。Building on an多德ontology and认识论方法,Mengers analysis of economic伴with a subjectivist机构is the culminating point of his thought。经济的不平衡、不协调的形象是通过无休止的贸易过程而产生的复杂关系。这篇论文的结论是,奥地利经济学家承认进步是规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Genesis of the 'Austrian' Label: Carl Menger's Thought
Ce papier soutient que lindiscipline paradigmatique qui caracterise leconomie Autrichienne contemporaine pourrait etre effacee si les economistes Autrichiens prenaient en consideration lunite doctrinale de Carl Menger dans son essai de construire une theorie subjectiviste des institutions. Construite sur une ontologie et une epistemologie aristotelicienne assortie d une methodologie subjectiviste, lanalyse mengerienne des institutions economiques est le point culminant de sa pensee. Ne cherchant ni lequilibration, ni la coordination, limage mengerienne de leconomie est celle de relations complexes qui emergent au travers de sequences infinies de processus dechange. Larticle conclut en suggerant que le progres soit reconnu comme la norme par les economistes Autrichiens.This paper argues that the paradigmatic indiscipline that characterizes contemporary Austrian Economics can be smoothed out if Austrian economists appreciate the doctrinal unity of Carl Mengers attempt to construct a subjectivist theory of institutions. Building on an Aristotelian ontology and epistemology coupled with a subjectivist methodology, Mengers analysis of economic institutions is the culminating point of his thought. Neither equilibrating, nor coordinating, Mengers image of the economy is that of complex relationships emerging through unending sequences of exchange processes. The paper concludes by suggesting that progress be acknowledged as the norm by Austrian economists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines (JEEH) is a journal of political economy and interdisciplinary economic studies. It addresses economic issues in political theory, social dynamics, social science methodology, and philosophy. Today, JEEH has an international audience, and welcomes contributions written by scholars from around the world. JEEH''s goals are: -To bring together economics with neighboring disciplines such as law, history, political science, sociology, philosophy, psychology, and anthropology -To promote the development of the Austrian approach to economics (Austrian School) and to provide discussion and controversy -To reconcile economics with the ethical and policy-oriented principles which make coordinated interaction between human beings possible
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信