意识障碍患者的脑深部刺激可改善长期功能结果。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1136/svn-2022-001998
Yi Yang, Qiheng He, Yuanyuan Dang, Xiaoyu Xia, Xin Xu, Xueling Chen, Jizong Zhao, Jianghong He
{"title":"意识障碍患者的脑深部刺激可改善长期功能结果。","authors":"Yi Yang, Qiheng He, Yuanyuan Dang, Xiaoyu Xia, Xin Xu, Xueling Chen, Jizong Zhao, Jianghong He","doi":"10.1136/svn-2022-001998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been preliminarily applied to treat patients with disorders of consciousness (DoCs). The study aimed to determine whether DBS was effective for treating patients with DoC and identify factors related to patients' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 365 patients with DoCs who were consecutively admitted from 15 July 2011 to 31 December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Multivariate regression and subgroup analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. The primary outcome was improvement in consciousness at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall improvement in consciousness at 1 year was achieved in 32.4% (12/37) of the DBS group compared with 4.3% (14/328) of the conservative group. After full adjustment, DBS significantly improved consciousness at 1 year (adjusted OR 11.90, 95% CI 3.65-38.46, p<0.001). There was a significant treatment×follow up interaction (H=14.99, p<0.001). DBS had significantly better effects in patients with minimally conscious state (MCS) compared with patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (p for interaction <0.001). A nomogram based on age, state of consciousness, pathogeny and duration of DoCs indicated excellent predictive performance (c-index=0.882).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DBS was associated with better outcomes in patients with DoC, and the effect was likely to be significantly greater in patients with MCS. DBS should be cautiously evaluated by nomogram preoperatively, and randomised controlled trials are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22021,"journal":{"name":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647871/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term functional outcomes improved with deep brain stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Yang, Qiheng He, Yuanyuan Dang, Xiaoyu Xia, Xin Xu, Xueling Chen, Jizong Zhao, Jianghong He\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2022-001998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been preliminarily applied to treat patients with disorders of consciousness (DoCs). The study aimed to determine whether DBS was effective for treating patients with DoC and identify factors related to patients' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 365 patients with DoCs who were consecutively admitted from 15 July 2011 to 31 December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Multivariate regression and subgroup analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. The primary outcome was improvement in consciousness at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall improvement in consciousness at 1 year was achieved in 32.4% (12/37) of the DBS group compared with 4.3% (14/328) of the conservative group. After full adjustment, DBS significantly improved consciousness at 1 year (adjusted OR 11.90, 95% CI 3.65-38.46, p<0.001). There was a significant treatment×follow up interaction (H=14.99, p<0.001). DBS had significantly better effects in patients with minimally conscious state (MCS) compared with patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (p for interaction <0.001). A nomogram based on age, state of consciousness, pathogeny and duration of DoCs indicated excellent predictive performance (c-index=0.882).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DBS was associated with better outcomes in patients with DoC, and the effect was likely to be significantly greater in patients with MCS. DBS should be cautiously evaluated by nomogram preoperatively, and randomised controlled trials are still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke and Vascular Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke and Vascular Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-001998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-001998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:脑深部刺激(DBS)已初步应用于治疗意识障碍(DoCs)患者。该研究旨在确定DBS是否对DoC患者有效,并确定与患者预后相关的因素。方法:回顾性分析2011年7月15日至2021年12月31日连续入院的365例多发性硬化症患者的数据。进行多变量回归和亚组分析,以调整潜在的混杂因素。主要结果是1年时意识有所改善。结果:1年时,DBS组的意识总体改善率为32.4%(12/37),而保守组为4.3%(14/328)。完全调整后,DBS在1年时显著改善了意识(调整OR 11.90,95%CI 3.65-38.46,P结论:DBS与DoC患者的更好结果相关,MCS患者的效果可能更大。术前应通过列线图谨慎评估DBS,仍需进行随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term functional outcomes improved with deep brain stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been preliminarily applied to treat patients with disorders of consciousness (DoCs). The study aimed to determine whether DBS was effective for treating patients with DoC and identify factors related to patients' outcomes.

Methods: Data from 365 patients with DoCs who were consecutively admitted from 15 July 2011 to 31 December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Multivariate regression and subgroup analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. The primary outcome was improvement in consciousness at 1 year.

Results: An overall improvement in consciousness at 1 year was achieved in 32.4% (12/37) of the DBS group compared with 4.3% (14/328) of the conservative group. After full adjustment, DBS significantly improved consciousness at 1 year (adjusted OR 11.90, 95% CI 3.65-38.46, p<0.001). There was a significant treatment×follow up interaction (H=14.99, p<0.001). DBS had significantly better effects in patients with minimally conscious state (MCS) compared with patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (p for interaction <0.001). A nomogram based on age, state of consciousness, pathogeny and duration of DoCs indicated excellent predictive performance (c-index=0.882).

Conclusions: DBS was associated with better outcomes in patients with DoC, and the effect was likely to be significantly greater in patients with MCS. DBS should be cautiously evaluated by nomogram preoperatively, and randomised controlled trials are still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Stroke and Vascular Neurology (SVN) is the official journal of the Chinese Stroke Association. Supported by a team of renowned Editors, and fully Open Access, the journal encourages debate on controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信