{"title":"一种新的疤痕评估工具——疤痕与照片匹配评估(MAPS)的可靠性测试。","authors":"M. Masters, M. Mcmahon, Birgit Svens","doi":"10.1097/01.BCR.0000162157.26052.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new scar-assessment tool, the Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS), which uses a set of reference photographs, a numeric scale, and location technique, was tested for its reliability in two stages. First, using five adults, three raters assessed 32 burns scars twice within 3 days. Subsequently, reliability was tested during a 6-month time frame, emphasizing the process of localizing test areas as scars changed and raters forgot the previous assessment. Three raters, from a pool of five, each made three assessments on 29 scars in seven subjects, on average 8 weeks apart. Inter-rater reliability was tested, using Kendall's Tau C and intraclass correlations, respectively, for stages 1 and 2. Agreement was good for border height (0.63-0.70 and 0.78), moderate to good for thickness (0.60-0.74 and 0.81), and good for color (0.55-0.71 and 0.79), whereas for surface it was fair (0.25-0.38 and 0.40). The localization technique was reliable (accuracy within 3 mm) in 93% to 96% of recordings. The MAPS tool is considered ready for clinical use.","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"150 6 1","pages":"273-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).\",\"authors\":\"M. Masters, M. Mcmahon, Birgit Svens\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.BCR.0000162157.26052.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new scar-assessment tool, the Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS), which uses a set of reference photographs, a numeric scale, and location technique, was tested for its reliability in two stages. First, using five adults, three raters assessed 32 burns scars twice within 3 days. Subsequently, reliability was tested during a 6-month time frame, emphasizing the process of localizing test areas as scars changed and raters forgot the previous assessment. Three raters, from a pool of five, each made three assessments on 29 scars in seven subjects, on average 8 weeks apart. Inter-rater reliability was tested, using Kendall's Tau C and intraclass correlations, respectively, for stages 1 and 2. Agreement was good for border height (0.63-0.70 and 0.78), moderate to good for thickness (0.60-0.74 and 0.81), and good for color (0.55-0.71 and 0.79), whereas for surface it was fair (0.25-0.38 and 0.40). The localization technique was reliable (accuracy within 3 mm) in 93% to 96% of recordings. The MAPS tool is considered ready for clinical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"150 6 1\",\"pages\":\"273-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000162157.26052.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000162157.26052.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71
摘要
一种新的疤痕评估工具,疤痕和照片匹配评估(MAPS),使用一组参考照片,一个数字尺度和定位技术,在两个阶段对其可靠性进行了测试。首先,使用5名成年人,3名评分者在3天内对32个烧伤疤痕进行了两次评估。随后,在6个月的时间框架内对可靠性进行了测试,强调了在疤痕改变和评分者忘记先前评估时定位测试区域的过程。从5名评价者中选出3名评价者,每人对7名受试者的29处疤痕进行3次评估,平均间隔8周。对第一阶段和第二阶段分别使用Kendall's Tau C和类内相关性测试了等级间的信度。边界高度(0.63-0.70和0.78),厚度(0.60-0.74和0.81)中等至良好,颜色(0.55-0.71和0.79)良好,而表面则是公平的(0.25-0.38和0.40)。定位技术在93% ~ 96%的记录中是可靠的(精度在3 mm以内)。MAPS工具被认为可以用于临床。
Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
A new scar-assessment tool, the Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS), which uses a set of reference photographs, a numeric scale, and location technique, was tested for its reliability in two stages. First, using five adults, three raters assessed 32 burns scars twice within 3 days. Subsequently, reliability was tested during a 6-month time frame, emphasizing the process of localizing test areas as scars changed and raters forgot the previous assessment. Three raters, from a pool of five, each made three assessments on 29 scars in seven subjects, on average 8 weeks apart. Inter-rater reliability was tested, using Kendall's Tau C and intraclass correlations, respectively, for stages 1 and 2. Agreement was good for border height (0.63-0.70 and 0.78), moderate to good for thickness (0.60-0.74 and 0.81), and good for color (0.55-0.71 and 0.79), whereas for surface it was fair (0.25-0.38 and 0.40). The localization technique was reliable (accuracy within 3 mm) in 93% to 96% of recordings. The MAPS tool is considered ready for clinical use.