是否有视频特性可以提高妇产科手术视频的准确性和质量?(身份证:1376966)

Jamie Mcilvaine, J. Foncham, A. Francis, E. Kayaalp
{"title":"是否有视频特性可以提高妇产科手术视频的准确性和质量?(身份证:1376966)","authors":"Jamie Mcilvaine, J. Foncham, A. Francis, E. Kayaalp","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000931196.59419.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: YouTube has emerged as a common resource used by ob-gyn residents to learn procedural skills. There has not been any research conducted that examines the relationship between video characteristics and the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. The purpose of this study was to assess whether YouTube video metrics, including number of likes, views, channel subscribers, geographic location, and organizational affiliations, can be used to gauge the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. METHODS: Using American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) surgical curriculum topics, we conducted a search query into YouTube and sorted by relevance. Screening criteria were used to exclude videos. We then recorded video characteristics and scored the videos using the Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool for quality. Additionally, we scored videos for accuracy by comparing them to the ACOG Surgical Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SCOG) checklist. RESULTS: Of the 306 videos analyzed, number of likes, views, channel subscribers, and geographic location were not of high quality with LAP-VEGaS scores less than 11. The number of likes, views, and channel subscribers were not significantly associated with LAP-VEGaS or SCOG accuracy. There was a significant difference in LAP-VEGaS score and SCOG accuracy with international health care organization/specialty society with P values of .004 and .001, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the characteristics studied, number of likes, views, and channel subscribers, and geographic location did not have a statistically significant difference in accuracy of educational value. Only association with international health care organizations/specialty societies was significantly associated with an increased LAP-VEGaS, indicating increased quality of video and increased percent accuracy by ACOG standards.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are There Video Characteristics That Improve the Accuracy and Quality of Ob-Gyn Procedural Videos? [ID: 1376966]\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Mcilvaine, J. Foncham, A. Francis, E. Kayaalp\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.AOG.0000931196.59419.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: YouTube has emerged as a common resource used by ob-gyn residents to learn procedural skills. There has not been any research conducted that examines the relationship between video characteristics and the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. The purpose of this study was to assess whether YouTube video metrics, including number of likes, views, channel subscribers, geographic location, and organizational affiliations, can be used to gauge the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. METHODS: Using American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) surgical curriculum topics, we conducted a search query into YouTube and sorted by relevance. Screening criteria were used to exclude videos. We then recorded video characteristics and scored the videos using the Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool for quality. Additionally, we scored videos for accuracy by comparing them to the ACOG Surgical Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SCOG) checklist. RESULTS: Of the 306 videos analyzed, number of likes, views, channel subscribers, and geographic location were not of high quality with LAP-VEGaS scores less than 11. The number of likes, views, and channel subscribers were not significantly associated with LAP-VEGaS or SCOG accuracy. There was a significant difference in LAP-VEGaS score and SCOG accuracy with international health care organization/specialty society with P values of .004 and .001, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the characteristics studied, number of likes, views, and channel subscribers, and geographic location did not have a statistically significant difference in accuracy of educational value. Only association with international health care organizations/specialty societies was significantly associated with an increased LAP-VEGaS, indicating increased quality of video and increased percent accuracy by ACOG standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000931196.59419.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000931196.59419.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:YouTube已经成为妇产科住院医生学习程序技能的常用资源。目前还没有任何研究调查视频特征与妇产科程序视频的质量和准确性之间的关系。本研究的目的是评估YouTube视频指标,包括喜欢的数量、观看次数、频道订阅者、地理位置和组织隶属关系,是否可以用来衡量妇产科程序视频的质量和准确性。方法:利用美国妇产科学院(ACOG)的外科课程主题,在YouTube上进行搜索查询,并按相关性进行排序。筛选标准用于排除视频。然后,我们记录视频特征,并使用腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)视频质量评估工具对视频进行评分。此外,我们通过将视频与ACOG妇产科外科课程(SCOG)核对表进行比较,对视频的准确性进行评分。结果:在分析的306个视频中,点赞数量、观看次数、频道订阅者数量和地理位置质量不高,LAP-VEGaS得分低于11分。喜欢、观看和频道订阅者的数量与LAP-VEGaS或SCOG的准确性没有显著关联。ap - vegas评分和SCOG准确度与国际卫生保健组织/专科学会比较差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.004和0.001)。结论:在研究的特征中,点赞数、观看数、频道订阅者数和地理位置对教育价值的准确性没有统计学意义。只有与国际卫生保健组织/专业协会的联系与LAP-VEGaS的增加显著相关,这表明按照ACOG标准,视频质量和准确率都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are There Video Characteristics That Improve the Accuracy and Quality of Ob-Gyn Procedural Videos? [ID: 1376966]
INTRODUCTION: YouTube has emerged as a common resource used by ob-gyn residents to learn procedural skills. There has not been any research conducted that examines the relationship between video characteristics and the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. The purpose of this study was to assess whether YouTube video metrics, including number of likes, views, channel subscribers, geographic location, and organizational affiliations, can be used to gauge the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. METHODS: Using American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) surgical curriculum topics, we conducted a search query into YouTube and sorted by relevance. Screening criteria were used to exclude videos. We then recorded video characteristics and scored the videos using the Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool for quality. Additionally, we scored videos for accuracy by comparing them to the ACOG Surgical Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SCOG) checklist. RESULTS: Of the 306 videos analyzed, number of likes, views, channel subscribers, and geographic location were not of high quality with LAP-VEGaS scores less than 11. The number of likes, views, and channel subscribers were not significantly associated with LAP-VEGaS or SCOG accuracy. There was a significant difference in LAP-VEGaS score and SCOG accuracy with international health care organization/specialty society with P values of .004 and .001, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the characteristics studied, number of likes, views, and channel subscribers, and geographic location did not have a statistically significant difference in accuracy of educational value. Only association with international health care organizations/specialty societies was significantly associated with an increased LAP-VEGaS, indicating increased quality of video and increased percent accuracy by ACOG standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信