信息内容和全科医生建议锻炼对膝骨关节炎治疗信念和意向的影响:在线多臂随机对照试验》。

ACR Open Rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1002/acr2.11513
Belinda J Lawford, Kim L Bennell, Michelle Hall, Thorlene Egerton, Fiona McManus, Karen E Lamb, Rana S Hinman
{"title":"信息内容和全科医生建议锻炼对膝骨关节炎治疗信念和意向的影响:在线多臂随机对照试验》。","authors":"Belinda J Lawford, Kim L Bennell, Michelle Hall, Thorlene Egerton, Fiona McManus, Karen E Lamb, Rana S Hinman","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate effects of general osteoarthritis (OA) information in addition to a treatment option grid and general practitioner (GP) recommendation to exercise on treatment beliefs and intentions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online randomized trial of 735 people 45 years old or older without OA who were recruited from a consumer survey network. Participants read a hypothetical scenario about visiting their GP for knee problems and were randomized to the following: i) 'general information', ii) 'option grid' (general information plus option grid), or iii) 'option grid plus recommendation' (general information plus option grid plus GP exercise recommendation). The primary outcome was an agreement that exercise is the best management option (0-10 numeric rating scale; higher scores indicating higher agreement that exercise is best). The secondary outcomes were beliefs about other management options and management intentions. Linear regression models estimated the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) between-group difference in postintervention scores, adjusted for baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Option grid plus recommendation led to higher agreement that exercise is the best management by a mean of 0.4 units (95% CI: 0.1-0.6) compared with general information. There were no other between-group differences for the primary outcome. Option grid led to higher agreement that surgery was best, and x-rays were necessary, compared with general information (mean between-group differences: 0.7 [CI: 0.2-1.1] and 0.5 [CI: 0.1-1.0], respectively) and option grid plus recommendation (0.5 [CI: 0.1-0.9] and 0.9 [CI: 0.4-1.3]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addition of an option grid and GP exercise recommendation to general OA information led to more favorable views that exercise was best for the hypothetical knee problem. However, differences were small and of unclear clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 1","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/af/ACR2-5-17.PMC9837392.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Information Content and General Practitioner Recommendation to Exercise on Treatment Beliefs and Intentions for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Online Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda J Lawford, Kim L Bennell, Michelle Hall, Thorlene Egerton, Fiona McManus, Karen E Lamb, Rana S Hinman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.11513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate effects of general osteoarthritis (OA) information in addition to a treatment option grid and general practitioner (GP) recommendation to exercise on treatment beliefs and intentions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online randomized trial of 735 people 45 years old or older without OA who were recruited from a consumer survey network. Participants read a hypothetical scenario about visiting their GP for knee problems and were randomized to the following: i) 'general information', ii) 'option grid' (general information plus option grid), or iii) 'option grid plus recommendation' (general information plus option grid plus GP exercise recommendation). The primary outcome was an agreement that exercise is the best management option (0-10 numeric rating scale; higher scores indicating higher agreement that exercise is best). The secondary outcomes were beliefs about other management options and management intentions. Linear regression models estimated the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) between-group difference in postintervention scores, adjusted for baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Option grid plus recommendation led to higher agreement that exercise is the best management by a mean of 0.4 units (95% CI: 0.1-0.6) compared with general information. There were no other between-group differences for the primary outcome. Option grid led to higher agreement that surgery was best, and x-rays were necessary, compared with general information (mean between-group differences: 0.7 [CI: 0.2-1.1] and 0.5 [CI: 0.1-1.0], respectively) and option grid plus recommendation (0.5 [CI: 0.1-0.9] and 0.9 [CI: 0.4-1.3]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addition of an option grid and GP exercise recommendation to general OA information led to more favorable views that exercise was best for the hypothetical knee problem. However, differences were small and of unclear clinical importance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"17-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/af/ACR2-5-17.PMC9837392.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估除治疗选择网格和全科医生(GP)建议锻炼外,一般骨关节炎(OA)信息对治疗信念和意向的影响:一项在线随机试验,从消费者调查网络中招募了735名45岁或45岁以上无OA的人。参与者阅读了关于因膝关节问题就诊全科医生的假设情景,并被随机分配到以下选项:i)"一般信息";ii)"选项网格"(一般信息加选项网格);或iii)"选项网格加建议"(一般信息加选项网格加全科医生运动建议)。主要结果是对运动是最佳治疗方案的认同度(0-10 分数字评分表;分数越高,对运动是最佳方案的认同度越高)。次要结果是对其他管理方案的看法和管理意愿。线性回归模型估算了干预后得分的组间差异平均值(95% 置信区间 [CI]),并对基线进行了调整:结果:与一般信息相比,选项网格加推荐使人们更认同运动是最好的治疗方法,平均提高了 0.4 个单位(95% 置信区间:0.1-0.6)。在主要结果方面没有其他组间差异。与一般信息相比,选项网格在手术是最佳治疗方法和 X 光检查是必要的这两个方面的认同度更高(平均组间差异为 0.7 [CI:0.1-0.6]):分别为 0.7 [CI:0.2-1.1] 和 0.5 [CI:0.1-1.0])和选项网格加推荐(分别为 0.5 [CI:0.1-0.9] 和 0.9 [CI:0.4-1.3]):结论:在一般 OA 信息的基础上增加选项网格和全科医生运动建议,可使人们更倾向于认为运动是解决假想膝关节问题的最佳方法。然而,两者之间的差异很小,临床重要性也不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Information Content and General Practitioner Recommendation to Exercise on Treatment Beliefs and Intentions for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Online Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of Information Content and General Practitioner Recommendation to Exercise on Treatment Beliefs and Intentions for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Online Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of Information Content and General Practitioner Recommendation to Exercise on Treatment Beliefs and Intentions for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Online Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate effects of general osteoarthritis (OA) information in addition to a treatment option grid and general practitioner (GP) recommendation to exercise on treatment beliefs and intentions.

Methods: An online randomized trial of 735 people 45 years old or older without OA who were recruited from a consumer survey network. Participants read a hypothetical scenario about visiting their GP for knee problems and were randomized to the following: i) 'general information', ii) 'option grid' (general information plus option grid), or iii) 'option grid plus recommendation' (general information plus option grid plus GP exercise recommendation). The primary outcome was an agreement that exercise is the best management option (0-10 numeric rating scale; higher scores indicating higher agreement that exercise is best). The secondary outcomes were beliefs about other management options and management intentions. Linear regression models estimated the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) between-group difference in postintervention scores, adjusted for baseline.

Results: Option grid plus recommendation led to higher agreement that exercise is the best management by a mean of 0.4 units (95% CI: 0.1-0.6) compared with general information. There were no other between-group differences for the primary outcome. Option grid led to higher agreement that surgery was best, and x-rays were necessary, compared with general information (mean between-group differences: 0.7 [CI: 0.2-1.1] and 0.5 [CI: 0.1-1.0], respectively) and option grid plus recommendation (0.5 [CI: 0.1-0.9] and 0.9 [CI: 0.4-1.3]).

Conclusion: Addition of an option grid and GP exercise recommendation to general OA information led to more favorable views that exercise was best for the hypothetical knee problem. However, differences were small and of unclear clinical importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信