基于frax的俄罗斯联邦男性干预阈值:俄罗斯骨质疏松症协会专家共识

E. Gladkova, O. Nikitinskaya, I. Skripnikova, M. Myagkova, I. Baranova, Z. Belaya, K. Belova, L. Evstigneeva, O. Ershova, B. V. Zavodovskii, O. Kosmatova, E. Otteva, Y. Polyakova, L. Sivordova, A. Suleymanova, N. Toroptsova, T. Tsoriev, O. Lesnyak
{"title":"基于frax的俄罗斯联邦男性干预阈值:俄罗斯骨质疏松症协会专家共识","authors":"E. Gladkova, O. Nikitinskaya, I. Skripnikova, M. Myagkova, I. Baranova, Z. Belaya, K. Belova, L. Evstigneeva, O. Ershova, B. V. Zavodovskii, O. Kosmatova, E. Otteva, Y. Polyakova, L. Sivordova, A. Suleymanova, N. Toroptsova, T. Tsoriev, O. Lesnyak","doi":"10.47360/1995-4484-2023-320-329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the European guidelines for osteoporosis, the same FRAX intervention threshold is suggested for men as for women. At the same time, in the Russian Federation, according to research data, an extremely low proportion of identified men who are subject to the initiation of osteoporosis therapy. The female intervention threshold identifies only 1.1 to 4% of men for treatment. Aim – to develop and evaluate various options for the intervention threshold using the FRAX calculator for men in the Russian Federation and adopt the most acceptable intervention threshold by consensus. Material and methods. Delphi voting was conducted among 18 Russian experts who have publications and personal reports about their experience with the FRAX calculator. For discussion, 5 intervention threshold options with the corresponding rationale based on the literature reference were presented, as well as the proportion of men of different ages to be initiated in each of the options (based on several Russian population-based studies). Anonymous voting was carried out using the Delphi method with questionnaire placed in the Google form. It was proposed to evaluate all options for intervention thresholds on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered reached if the intervention threshold reached a Likert score of 7 or more points in 80% or more of the experts. The rating of each intervention threshold option was expressed as mean and standard deviations. Results. In the first round of voting, the maximum rating and percentage of agreement is reached for the 9% fixed interference threshold option based on the FRAX calculation. The rating was 7.72±1.6 points, the percentage of experts’ agreement was 88.9%. A fixed threshold of 9% determined 13–19.5% of men aged 50 years and older to be treated for osteoporosis, while their proportion increased to 26–38% at the age of 85 years and older. Conclusion. The consensus of experts of the Russian association on osteoporosis suggests initiating treatment of osteoporosis in Russian men with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures according to FRAX of 9% or higher.","PeriodicalId":21518,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FRAX-based intervention thresholds for men in the Russian Federation: Expert consensus of the Russian association on osteoporosis\",\"authors\":\"E. Gladkova, O. Nikitinskaya, I. Skripnikova, M. Myagkova, I. Baranova, Z. Belaya, K. Belova, L. Evstigneeva, O. Ershova, B. V. Zavodovskii, O. Kosmatova, E. Otteva, Y. Polyakova, L. Sivordova, A. Suleymanova, N. Toroptsova, T. Tsoriev, O. Lesnyak\",\"doi\":\"10.47360/1995-4484-2023-320-329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the European guidelines for osteoporosis, the same FRAX intervention threshold is suggested for men as for women. At the same time, in the Russian Federation, according to research data, an extremely low proportion of identified men who are subject to the initiation of osteoporosis therapy. The female intervention threshold identifies only 1.1 to 4% of men for treatment. Aim – to develop and evaluate various options for the intervention threshold using the FRAX calculator for men in the Russian Federation and adopt the most acceptable intervention threshold by consensus. Material and methods. Delphi voting was conducted among 18 Russian experts who have publications and personal reports about their experience with the FRAX calculator. For discussion, 5 intervention threshold options with the corresponding rationale based on the literature reference were presented, as well as the proportion of men of different ages to be initiated in each of the options (based on several Russian population-based studies). Anonymous voting was carried out using the Delphi method with questionnaire placed in the Google form. It was proposed to evaluate all options for intervention thresholds on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered reached if the intervention threshold reached a Likert score of 7 or more points in 80% or more of the experts. The rating of each intervention threshold option was expressed as mean and standard deviations. Results. In the first round of voting, the maximum rating and percentage of agreement is reached for the 9% fixed interference threshold option based on the FRAX calculation. The rating was 7.72±1.6 points, the percentage of experts’ agreement was 88.9%. A fixed threshold of 9% determined 13–19.5% of men aged 50 years and older to be treated for osteoporosis, while their proportion increased to 26–38% at the age of 85 years and older. Conclusion. The consensus of experts of the Russian association on osteoporosis suggests initiating treatment of osteoporosis in Russian men with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures according to FRAX of 9% or higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"171 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2023-320-329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2023-320-329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据欧洲骨质疏松症指南,建议男性和女性使用相同的FRAX干预阈值。与此同时,根据研究数据,在俄罗斯联邦,接受骨质疏松症治疗的确诊男性比例极低。女性干预阈值确定只有1.1%至4%的男性需要治疗。目的-使用俄罗斯联邦男性FRAX计算器制定和评估干预阈值的各种选择,并通过协商一致采用最可接受的干预阈值。材料和方法。德尔菲投票是在18位俄罗斯专家中进行的,他们发表了关于FRAX计算器使用经验的出版物和个人报告。为了进行讨论,根据文献参考提出了5个干预阈值选项及其相应的基本原理,以及每个选项中不同年龄男性的启动比例(基于几项基于俄罗斯人口的研究)。采用德尔菲法进行匿名投票,问卷放置在谷歌表格中。建议以9分李克特量表评估干预阈值的所有选项。如果干预阈值在80%或以上的专家中达到7分或以上,则认为达成了共识。每个干预阈值选项的评分用平均值和标准差表示。结果。在第一轮投票中,根据FRAX计算,9%的固定干扰阈值选项达到最大评级和同意百分比。评分为7.72±1.6分,专家同意率为88.9%。9%的固定阈值确定了13-19.5%的50岁及以上男性骨质疏松症的治疗,而85岁及以上的比例增加到26-38%。结论。俄罗斯骨质疏松症协会专家的共识是,根据FRAX, 10年发生重大骨质疏松性骨折的概率为9%或更高的俄罗斯男性应开始接受骨质疏松症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FRAX-based intervention thresholds for men in the Russian Federation: Expert consensus of the Russian association on osteoporosis
According to the European guidelines for osteoporosis, the same FRAX intervention threshold is suggested for men as for women. At the same time, in the Russian Federation, according to research data, an extremely low proportion of identified men who are subject to the initiation of osteoporosis therapy. The female intervention threshold identifies only 1.1 to 4% of men for treatment. Aim – to develop and evaluate various options for the intervention threshold using the FRAX calculator for men in the Russian Federation and adopt the most acceptable intervention threshold by consensus. Material and methods. Delphi voting was conducted among 18 Russian experts who have publications and personal reports about their experience with the FRAX calculator. For discussion, 5 intervention threshold options with the corresponding rationale based on the literature reference were presented, as well as the proportion of men of different ages to be initiated in each of the options (based on several Russian population-based studies). Anonymous voting was carried out using the Delphi method with questionnaire placed in the Google form. It was proposed to evaluate all options for intervention thresholds on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered reached if the intervention threshold reached a Likert score of 7 or more points in 80% or more of the experts. The rating of each intervention threshold option was expressed as mean and standard deviations. Results. In the first round of voting, the maximum rating and percentage of agreement is reached for the 9% fixed interference threshold option based on the FRAX calculation. The rating was 7.72±1.6 points, the percentage of experts’ agreement was 88.9%. A fixed threshold of 9% determined 13–19.5% of men aged 50 years and older to be treated for osteoporosis, while their proportion increased to 26–38% at the age of 85 years and older. Conclusion. The consensus of experts of the Russian association on osteoporosis suggests initiating treatment of osteoporosis in Russian men with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures according to FRAX of 9% or higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信