{"title":"COBOL 74是可移植的","authors":"D.L Fisher , P.E Gibson","doi":"10.1016/0167-8051(84)90003-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earlier work, principally on COBOL 68 compilers, showed that it was impossible to define a useful subset of COBOL that could be conveniently transported across computers from a number of different manufacturers.</p><p>This latest work, carried out with the assistance of a grant from the Leverhulme Trust, indicates a much improved situation between dialects of COBOL 74.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100323,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Standards","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8051(84)90003-2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COBOL 74 is portable\",\"authors\":\"D.L Fisher , P.E Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-8051(84)90003-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earlier work, principally on COBOL 68 compilers, showed that it was impossible to define a useful subset of COBOL that could be conveniently transported across computers from a number of different manufacturers.</p><p>This latest work, carried out with the assistance of a grant from the Leverhulme Trust, indicates a much improved situation between dialects of COBOL 74.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Standards\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 143-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8051(84)90003-2\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167805184900032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167805184900032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Earlier work, principally on COBOL 68 compilers, showed that it was impossible to define a useful subset of COBOL that could be conveniently transported across computers from a number of different manufacturers.
This latest work, carried out with the assistance of a grant from the Leverhulme Trust, indicates a much improved situation between dialects of COBOL 74.