ISAC和ALEX2多路测试系统的综合比较

A. Platteel, P. van der Pol, J. Murk, Ingrid Verbrugge-Bakker, Marian Hack-Steemers, Theo H.W.M. Roovers, M. Heron
{"title":"ISAC和ALEX2多路测试系统的综合比较","authors":"A. Platteel, P. van der Pol, J. Murk, Ingrid Verbrugge-Bakker, Marian Hack-Steemers, Theo H.W.M. Roovers, M. Heron","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2022-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity is based on anamnesis, provocation as well as blood- and skin testing. Multiplex specific IgE (sIgE) testing enables determination of sIgE antibodies against multiple recombinant or purified natural allergen components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the novel ALEX2® (Allergy Explorer, ALEX2 test introduced on the market November 2019) multiplex platform and to compare it with the ImmunoCAP ISAC® test system. Methods Serum samples of 49 patients, routinely determined with ISAC, were selected based on positive results covering in total most of the 112 ISAC components. Cohen’s kappa, negative percent agreement (NPA), and positive percent agreement (PPA) of ALEX2 data compared to ISAC data (as a non-reference standard) were computed for those allergen components present on both platforms (n=103). Furthermore, in some samples sIgE results against allergen extracts and/or -components tested with either ImmunoCAP® (ThermoFisher) or IMMULITE® (Siemens) were available and compared to ALEX2 results. Results The overall agreement between ISAC and ALEX2 common allergen components was 94%. NPA and PPA were respectively 95 and 90%. Kappa values differed for specific allergen groups and varied between 0.60 and 0.92 showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. Of the qualitative discrepancies between ALEX2 and ISAC, 59% were related to weak positive results i.e. results under 1 kUA/L or 1 ISU, respectively. Conclusions The method comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex tests showed a high concordance for those allergen components present on both platforms.","PeriodicalId":10388,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex test systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Platteel, P. van der Pol, J. Murk, Ingrid Verbrugge-Bakker, Marian Hack-Steemers, Theo H.W.M. Roovers, M. Heron\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2022-0191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity is based on anamnesis, provocation as well as blood- and skin testing. Multiplex specific IgE (sIgE) testing enables determination of sIgE antibodies against multiple recombinant or purified natural allergen components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the novel ALEX2® (Allergy Explorer, ALEX2 test introduced on the market November 2019) multiplex platform and to compare it with the ImmunoCAP ISAC® test system. Methods Serum samples of 49 patients, routinely determined with ISAC, were selected based on positive results covering in total most of the 112 ISAC components. Cohen’s kappa, negative percent agreement (NPA), and positive percent agreement (PPA) of ALEX2 data compared to ISAC data (as a non-reference standard) were computed for those allergen components present on both platforms (n=103). Furthermore, in some samples sIgE results against allergen extracts and/or -components tested with either ImmunoCAP® (ThermoFisher) or IMMULITE® (Siemens) were available and compared to ALEX2 results. Results The overall agreement between ISAC and ALEX2 common allergen components was 94%. NPA and PPA were respectively 95 and 90%. Kappa values differed for specific allergen groups and varied between 0.60 and 0.92 showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. Of the qualitative discrepancies between ALEX2 and ISAC, 59% were related to weak positive results i.e. results under 1 kUA/L or 1 ISU, respectively. Conclusions The method comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex tests showed a high concordance for those allergen components present on both platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的诊断I型超敏反应是基于记忆,刺激以及血液和皮肤试验。多重特异性IgE (sIgE)测试能够确定sIgE抗体针对多种重组或纯化的天然过敏原成分。本研究的目的是评估新型ALEX2®(Allergy Explorer, ALEX2测试于2019年11月上市)多路平台的性能,并将其与ImmunoCAP ISAC®测试系统进行比较。方法对49例患者进行常规血清ISAC检测,检测结果为阳性,覆盖了ISAC 112项成分的大部分。对于两个平台上存在的过敏原成分(n=103),计算ALEX2数据与ISAC数据(作为非参考标准)相比的Cohen kappa、负百分比一致性(NPA)和正百分比一致性(PPA)。此外,在一些样品中,使用ImmunoCAP®(ThermoFisher)或IMMULITE®(Siemens)测试过敏原提取物和/或-成分的sIgE结果可用并与ALEX2结果进行比较。结果ISAC与ALEX2常见变应原成分的一致性为94%。NPA和PPA分别为95%和90%。特定过敏原组的Kappa值不同,在0.60和0.92之间变化,显示中度到几乎完全一致。在ALEX2和ISAC之间的质量差异中,59%与弱阳性结果有关,即分别在1 kUA/L或1 ISU下的结果。结论ISAC和ALEX2多重检测的方法比较表明,两个平台上存在的过敏原成分具有较高的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex test systems
Abstract Objectives Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity is based on anamnesis, provocation as well as blood- and skin testing. Multiplex specific IgE (sIgE) testing enables determination of sIgE antibodies against multiple recombinant or purified natural allergen components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the novel ALEX2® (Allergy Explorer, ALEX2 test introduced on the market November 2019) multiplex platform and to compare it with the ImmunoCAP ISAC® test system. Methods Serum samples of 49 patients, routinely determined with ISAC, were selected based on positive results covering in total most of the 112 ISAC components. Cohen’s kappa, negative percent agreement (NPA), and positive percent agreement (PPA) of ALEX2 data compared to ISAC data (as a non-reference standard) were computed for those allergen components present on both platforms (n=103). Furthermore, in some samples sIgE results against allergen extracts and/or -components tested with either ImmunoCAP® (ThermoFisher) or IMMULITE® (Siemens) were available and compared to ALEX2 results. Results The overall agreement between ISAC and ALEX2 common allergen components was 94%. NPA and PPA were respectively 95 and 90%. Kappa values differed for specific allergen groups and varied between 0.60 and 0.92 showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. Of the qualitative discrepancies between ALEX2 and ISAC, 59% were related to weak positive results i.e. results under 1 kUA/L or 1 ISU, respectively. Conclusions The method comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex tests showed a high concordance for those allergen components present on both platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信