急性阑尾炎的Alvarado评分:一项为期3年的审计,以评估在QHBFT≤16 s预测阴性阑尾切除术的有效性

Joshua Agilinko, Naseem Waraich
{"title":"急性阑尾炎的Alvarado评分:一项为期3年的审计,以评估在QHBFT≤16 s预测阴性阑尾切除术的有效性","authors":"Joshua Agilinko,&nbsp;Naseem Waraich","doi":"10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Alvarado score in reducing the rate of negative appendicectomy at Queen’s Hospital, a small district general hospital in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The retrospective, analytical study included all children who were ≤16 years old with a preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis undergoing appendicectomy subsequently. Children with other causes of acute abdominal pain were excluded from the study. A total of 118 patients were included. Based on their calculated Alvarado scores, they were stratified into two groups: Group A (Alvarado score &lt;6) and Group B (Alvarado score ≥6). Alvarado scores were compared with the histopathology reports, the gold standard for diagnosing acute appendicitis. The data gathered was then subjected to statistical analysis to measure our objective.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 118 patients (85 males, 33 females), 46 belonged to Group A and 72 to Group B.</p><p>Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis from histopathology reports was confirmed in 94 cases (79.6%). The overall sensitivity and positive predictive value of Alvarado score for acute appendicitis were 92% and 94% respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9 indicating a highly accurate test.</p><p>The sensitivity was only slightly higher for males with a score of &lt;6 than females (94.9% vs. 89.5%, p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>However, for scores ≥6, sensitivity among males was significantly higher than females (79% vs. 62.6%; p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>A multivariate analysis revealed that anorexia, right iliac fossa tenderness and rebound tenderness are significantly correlated with a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis (p = 0.025, 0.037 and 0.026 respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of a high Alvarado score (≥6) is highly predictive of acute appendicitis.</p><p>In women of childbearing age and Alvarado scores of &lt;6, other pathologies that mimic appendicitis must be considered. An US scan of abdomen and pelvis should be considered in a woman of child-bearing age before proceeding to a surgical intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100954,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 12-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.08.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: A 3-year audit to evaluate the usefulness in predicting negative appendicectomies in ≤16 s at QHBFT\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Agilinko,&nbsp;Naseem Waraich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Alvarado score in reducing the rate of negative appendicectomy at Queen’s Hospital, a small district general hospital in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The retrospective, analytical study included all children who were ≤16 years old with a preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis undergoing appendicectomy subsequently. Children with other causes of acute abdominal pain were excluded from the study. A total of 118 patients were included. Based on their calculated Alvarado scores, they were stratified into two groups: Group A (Alvarado score &lt;6) and Group B (Alvarado score ≥6). Alvarado scores were compared with the histopathology reports, the gold standard for diagnosing acute appendicitis. The data gathered was then subjected to statistical analysis to measure our objective.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 118 patients (85 males, 33 females), 46 belonged to Group A and 72 to Group B.</p><p>Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis from histopathology reports was confirmed in 94 cases (79.6%). The overall sensitivity and positive predictive value of Alvarado score for acute appendicitis were 92% and 94% respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9 indicating a highly accurate test.</p><p>The sensitivity was only slightly higher for males with a score of &lt;6 than females (94.9% vs. 89.5%, p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>However, for scores ≥6, sensitivity among males was significantly higher than females (79% vs. 62.6%; p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>A multivariate analysis revealed that anorexia, right iliac fossa tenderness and rebound tenderness are significantly correlated with a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis (p = 0.025, 0.037 and 0.026 respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of a high Alvarado score (≥6) is highly predictive of acute appendicitis.</p><p>In women of childbearing age and Alvarado scores of &lt;6, other pathologies that mimic appendicitis must be considered. An US scan of abdomen and pelvis should be considered in a woman of child-bearing age before proceeding to a surgical intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 12-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhccr.2017.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235294821730212X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Horizons in Clinical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235294821730212X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的评价Alvarado评分在降低英国女王医院阑尾切除术阴性率中的诊断准确性。方法回顾性分析研究纳入所有≤16岁初步诊断为急性阑尾炎并随后行阑尾切除术的儿童。有其他急性腹痛原因的儿童被排除在研究之外。共纳入118例患者。根据计算的Alvarado评分,将患者分为A组(Alvarado评分<6)和B组(Alvarado评分≥6)。将Alvarado评分与诊断急性阑尾炎的金标准组织病理学报告进行比较。然后对收集到的数据进行统计分析,以衡量我们的目标。结果118例患者(男85例,女33例)中,A组46例,b组72例,经组织病理学报告确诊急性阑尾炎94例(79.6%)。Alvarado评分对急性阑尾炎的总体敏感性为92%,阳性预测值为94%。ROC曲线下的面积为0.9,表明测试非常准确。得分为<6的男性的敏感性仅略高于女性(94.9% vs. 89.5%, p <0.05)。然而,对于评分≥6分,男性的敏感性显著高于女性(79% vs. 62.6%;p & lt;0.05)。多因素分析显示,厌食症、右髂窝压痛和反跳压痛与急性阑尾炎的正确诊断有显著相关性(p分别为0.025、0.037和0.026)。结论高Alvarado评分(≥6)对急性阑尾炎具有较高的预测价值。在育龄妇女和阿尔瓦拉多评分为<6,其他病理模拟阑尾炎必须考虑。育龄妇女在进行手术前应考虑腹部和骨盆的超声扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: A 3-year audit to evaluate the usefulness in predicting negative appendicectomies in ≤16 s at QHBFT

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Alvarado score in reducing the rate of negative appendicectomy at Queen’s Hospital, a small district general hospital in England.

Methodology

The retrospective, analytical study included all children who were ≤16 years old with a preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis undergoing appendicectomy subsequently. Children with other causes of acute abdominal pain were excluded from the study. A total of 118 patients were included. Based on their calculated Alvarado scores, they were stratified into two groups: Group A (Alvarado score <6) and Group B (Alvarado score ≥6). Alvarado scores were compared with the histopathology reports, the gold standard for diagnosing acute appendicitis. The data gathered was then subjected to statistical analysis to measure our objective.

Results

Out of the 118 patients (85 males, 33 females), 46 belonged to Group A and 72 to Group B.

Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis from histopathology reports was confirmed in 94 cases (79.6%). The overall sensitivity and positive predictive value of Alvarado score for acute appendicitis were 92% and 94% respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9 indicating a highly accurate test.

The sensitivity was only slightly higher for males with a score of <6 than females (94.9% vs. 89.5%, p < 0.05).

However, for scores ≥6, sensitivity among males was significantly higher than females (79% vs. 62.6%; p < 0.05).

A multivariate analysis revealed that anorexia, right iliac fossa tenderness and rebound tenderness are significantly correlated with a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis (p = 0.025, 0.037 and 0.026 respectively).

Conclusion

The presence of a high Alvarado score (≥6) is highly predictive of acute appendicitis.

In women of childbearing age and Alvarado scores of <6, other pathologies that mimic appendicitis must be considered. An US scan of abdomen and pelvis should be considered in a woman of child-bearing age before proceeding to a surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信