科罗拉多州尼沃特岭亚高山森林臭氧沉积模型的评价

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
D. Szinyei, G. Gelybó, A. Guenther, A. Turnipseed, E. Tóth, P. Builtjes
{"title":"科罗拉多州尼沃特岭亚高山森林臭氧沉积模型的评价","authors":"D. Szinyei, G. Gelybó, A. Guenther, A. Turnipseed, E. Tóth, P. Builtjes","doi":"10.28974/idojaras.2018.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we evaluated three conceptually similar ozone gas deposition models. These dry deposition models are frequently used with chemical transport models for calculations over large spatial domains. However, large scale applications of surface-atmosphere exchange of reactive gases require modeling results as accurate as possible to avoid nonlinear accumulation of errors in the spatially representative results. In this paper, model evaluation and comparison against measured data over a coniferous forest at Niwot Ridge AmeriFlux site (Colorado, USA) is carried out. At this site, no previous model calibration took place for any of the models, therefore, we can test and compare their performances under similar conditions as they would perform in a spatial application. Our results show systematic model errors in all the three cases, model performance varies with time of the day, and the errors show a pronounced seasonal pattern as well. The introduction of soil moisture content stress in the model improved model performance regarding the magnitude of fluxes, but the correlation between measured and modeled ozone deposition values remains low. Our results suggest that ozone dry deposition model results should be interpreted carefully in large scale applications, where the accuracy can vary with land cover sometimes are biased. © 2018, Hungarian Meteorological Service. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":50393,"journal":{"name":"Idojaras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ozone deposition models over a subalpine forest in Niwot Ridge, Colorado\",\"authors\":\"D. Szinyei, G. Gelybó, A. Guenther, A. Turnipseed, E. Tóth, P. Builtjes\",\"doi\":\"10.28974/idojaras.2018.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we evaluated three conceptually similar ozone gas deposition models. These dry deposition models are frequently used with chemical transport models for calculations over large spatial domains. However, large scale applications of surface-atmosphere exchange of reactive gases require modeling results as accurate as possible to avoid nonlinear accumulation of errors in the spatially representative results. In this paper, model evaluation and comparison against measured data over a coniferous forest at Niwot Ridge AmeriFlux site (Colorado, USA) is carried out. At this site, no previous model calibration took place for any of the models, therefore, we can test and compare their performances under similar conditions as they would perform in a spatial application. Our results show systematic model errors in all the three cases, model performance varies with time of the day, and the errors show a pronounced seasonal pattern as well. The introduction of soil moisture content stress in the model improved model performance regarding the magnitude of fluxes, but the correlation between measured and modeled ozone deposition values remains low. Our results suggest that ozone dry deposition model results should be interpreted carefully in large scale applications, where the accuracy can vary with land cover sometimes are biased. © 2018, Hungarian Meteorological Service. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Idojaras\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Idojaras\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28974/idojaras.2018.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idojaras","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28974/idojaras.2018.2.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了三个概念相似的臭氧气体沉积模型。这些干沉积模型经常与化学输运模型一起用于大空间域的计算。然而,反应气体的地表-大气交换的大规模应用要求建模结果尽可能准确,以避免在空间代表性结果中误差的非线性累积。本文对美国科罗拉多州Niwot Ridge AmeriFlux站点的针叶林进行了模型评价,并与实测数据进行了比较。在这个站点,以前没有对任何模型进行过模型校准,因此,我们可以在类似的条件下测试和比较它们在空间应用中的性能。我们的研究结果表明,在所有三种情况下,模型都存在系统误差,模型性能随一天中的时间而变化,并且误差也表现出明显的季节性模式。在模型中引入土壤含水量应力改善了模型在通量大小方面的性能,但臭氧沉积测量值与模拟值之间的相关性仍然很低。我们的研究结果表明,在大尺度应用中,臭氧干沉积模型的结果应该仔细解释,其中精度可能随土地覆盖而变化,有时是有偏差的。©2018,匈牙利气象局。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of ozone deposition models over a subalpine forest in Niwot Ridge, Colorado
In this study, we evaluated three conceptually similar ozone gas deposition models. These dry deposition models are frequently used with chemical transport models for calculations over large spatial domains. However, large scale applications of surface-atmosphere exchange of reactive gases require modeling results as accurate as possible to avoid nonlinear accumulation of errors in the spatially representative results. In this paper, model evaluation and comparison against measured data over a coniferous forest at Niwot Ridge AmeriFlux site (Colorado, USA) is carried out. At this site, no previous model calibration took place for any of the models, therefore, we can test and compare their performances under similar conditions as they would perform in a spatial application. Our results show systematic model errors in all the three cases, model performance varies with time of the day, and the errors show a pronounced seasonal pattern as well. The introduction of soil moisture content stress in the model improved model performance regarding the magnitude of fluxes, but the correlation between measured and modeled ozone deposition values remains low. Our results suggest that ozone dry deposition model results should be interpreted carefully in large scale applications, where the accuracy can vary with land cover sometimes are biased. © 2018, Hungarian Meteorological Service. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Idojaras
Idojaras 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信