沙特阿拉伯牙医和牙科实习生中汞合金和复合材料的使用

Rahaf Al-Safadi, F. Radwan, Leenah Al-Momin, Raghad Bakhsh, Sarah Slais, A. Al-Abbad, Camelliea Al-Zawad, Zahra Shamrookh, Furat Al-Sultan, Huda i Al-Dajan, Zahra Al-Muhana
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯牙医和牙科实习生中汞合金和复合材料的使用","authors":"Rahaf Al-Safadi, F. Radwan, Leenah Al-Momin, Raghad Bakhsh, Sarah Slais, A. Al-Abbad, Camelliea Al-Zawad, Zahra Shamrookh, Furat Al-Sultan, Huda i Al-Dajan, Zahra Al-Muhana","doi":"10.18535//ijetst/v7i2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to detect the use of amalgam versus resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth among dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia and dental interns training in Saudi Arabia. \nMaterials and Methods: 318 patients aged ≥ 8 years were randomly selected and clinically examined for amalgam and resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth by dentists and by dental interns in Saudi Arabia. The restorations were placed in teeth preparations Class I and Class II. Also, bitewing and or periapical radiographs were used to define the depth of the cavity. The data obtained were documented in a patient examination form then statistically analyzed using Chi-Square Test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton Test and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient. \nResults: Composite was the predominant kind of restoration placed by dental interns, and dentists placed more composite restorations than amalgam ones. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dental interns (amalgam, composite) and the tooth type (maxillary / mandibular premolar, maxillary / mandibular molar), the class of tooth preparation, the cavity depth, the age of the patient, and the gender of the patient p> 0.05. However, there was a significant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the cavity depth p < 0.05. Also, dentists placed more composite restorations in maxillary first premolars and in young patients 8-29 years, while they placed more amalgam restorations in mandibular second molars and in older patients 41-50 years p < 0.05. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the class of cavity preparation and the gender of the patient p > 0.05. \nConclusion: Both dentists and dental interns used composite restorative material more than amalgam, but dentists placed more amalgam restorations than dental interns. Dental interns mainly used composite. \nKeywords: Amalgam, Composite, Class, Dentist, Depth, Intern, Type.","PeriodicalId":13970,"journal":{"name":"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amalgam and Composite Use among Dentists and Dental Interns in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Rahaf Al-Safadi, F. Radwan, Leenah Al-Momin, Raghad Bakhsh, Sarah Slais, A. Al-Abbad, Camelliea Al-Zawad, Zahra Shamrookh, Furat Al-Sultan, Huda i Al-Dajan, Zahra Al-Muhana\",\"doi\":\"10.18535//ijetst/v7i2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study was to detect the use of amalgam versus resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth among dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia and dental interns training in Saudi Arabia. \\nMaterials and Methods: 318 patients aged ≥ 8 years were randomly selected and clinically examined for amalgam and resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth by dentists and by dental interns in Saudi Arabia. The restorations were placed in teeth preparations Class I and Class II. Also, bitewing and or periapical radiographs were used to define the depth of the cavity. The data obtained were documented in a patient examination form then statistically analyzed using Chi-Square Test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton Test and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient. \\nResults: Composite was the predominant kind of restoration placed by dental interns, and dentists placed more composite restorations than amalgam ones. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dental interns (amalgam, composite) and the tooth type (maxillary / mandibular premolar, maxillary / mandibular molar), the class of tooth preparation, the cavity depth, the age of the patient, and the gender of the patient p> 0.05. However, there was a significant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the cavity depth p < 0.05. Also, dentists placed more composite restorations in maxillary first premolars and in young patients 8-29 years, while they placed more amalgam restorations in mandibular second molars and in older patients 41-50 years p < 0.05. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the class of cavity preparation and the gender of the patient p > 0.05. \\nConclusion: Both dentists and dental interns used composite restorative material more than amalgam, but dentists placed more amalgam restorations than dental interns. Dental interns mainly used composite. \\nKeywords: Amalgam, Composite, Class, Dentist, Depth, Intern, Type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18535//ijetst/v7i2.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535//ijetst/v7i2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检测在沙特阿拉伯执业的牙医和在沙特阿拉伯培训的牙科实习生中使用汞合金与树脂复合修复体放置在永久后牙中的情况。材料与方法:随机选择318例年龄≥8岁的患者,由沙特阿拉伯的牙医和牙科实习生对其进行永久性后牙汞合金和树脂复合修复的临床检查。修复体放置在I级和II级牙齿准备中。此外,咬牙和/或根尖周围x线片用于确定腔的深度。将获得的数据记录在患者检查表中,然后使用卡方检验或Fisher-Freeman-Halton检验和Spearman相关系数进行统计分析。结果:复合材料是牙科实习生放置修复体的主要类型,牙医放置复合材料修复体的数量多于汞合金修复体。实习医师放置修复体的种类(汞合金、复合材料)与牙型(上颌/下颌前磨牙、上颌/下颌磨牙)、预备牙种类、牙槽深度、患者年龄、患者性别之间的关系不显著(p < 0.05)。然而,牙医放置的修复类型(汞合金、复合材料)与牙槽深度有显著关系p < 0.05。在8 ~ 29岁的年轻患者中,上颌第一前磨牙采用复合材料修复体较多,而在41 ~ 50岁的老年患者中,下颌骨第二磨牙采用汞合金修复体较多(p < 0.05)。牙医放置的修复体种类(汞合金、复合材料)与口腔准备类别和患者性别之间的关系不显著(p < 0.05)。结论:牙科医生和牙科实习生使用的复合材料均多于汞合金,但牙科医生放置的汞合金修复体多于牙科实习生。牙科实习生主要采用复合材料。关键词:汞合金,复合材料,分类,牙医,深度,实习生,类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amalgam and Composite Use among Dentists and Dental Interns in Saudi Arabia
Aim: The aim of this study was to detect the use of amalgam versus resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth among dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia and dental interns training in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: 318 patients aged ≥ 8 years were randomly selected and clinically examined for amalgam and resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior vital teeth by dentists and by dental interns in Saudi Arabia. The restorations were placed in teeth preparations Class I and Class II. Also, bitewing and or periapical radiographs were used to define the depth of the cavity. The data obtained were documented in a patient examination form then statistically analyzed using Chi-Square Test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton Test and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient. Results: Composite was the predominant kind of restoration placed by dental interns, and dentists placed more composite restorations than amalgam ones. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dental interns (amalgam, composite) and the tooth type (maxillary / mandibular premolar, maxillary / mandibular molar), the class of tooth preparation, the cavity depth, the age of the patient, and the gender of the patient p> 0.05. However, there was a significant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the cavity depth p < 0.05. Also, dentists placed more composite restorations in maxillary first premolars and in young patients 8-29 years, while they placed more amalgam restorations in mandibular second molars and in older patients 41-50 years p < 0.05. There was an insignificant relationship between the kind of restoration placed by dentists (amalgam, composite) and the class of cavity preparation and the gender of the patient p > 0.05. Conclusion: Both dentists and dental interns used composite restorative material more than amalgam, but dentists placed more amalgam restorations than dental interns. Dental interns mainly used composite. Keywords: Amalgam, Composite, Class, Dentist, Depth, Intern, Type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信