考古学,历史断裂,和阿尼-基图华基的记忆和知识

Russell Townsend, Johi D. Griffin, Kathryn E. Sampeck
{"title":"考古学,历史断裂,和阿尼-基图华基的记忆和知识","authors":"Russell Townsend, Johi D. Griffin, Kathryn E. Sampeck","doi":"10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Comanche scholar and activist LaDonna Harris strongly advocates the recognition and promotion of the four Rs Core Cultural Values: relationships, responsibility, reciprocity, and redistribution. Our contribution discusses the specific forms of each of the four Rs in ᎠᏂᎦᏚᏩᎩ Ani-Kitu Hwagi (Cherokee) practices and ethics of ᎦᏓᎱ (gadahu), ᎦᏚᎩ (gadugi), ᏙᎯ (tõhi), and ᎣᏏ (osi). We present a case study of elements of the history one settlement, ᏅᏅᏁᏱ (Nvnvnyi), as a way to discuss the contemporary reality of heritage management and archaeology's role within that management. Archaeology in Native American communities is often associated with destruction and disruption, so a critical framework that evaluates obliteration is crucial for this specific topic. With the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 and Final Rule in 1995, Ani-Kitu Hwagi people had more say in archaeological activities. Despite this direct oversight, destructive actions to the past and historic resources continues. The countervailing forces to gadahu, gadugi, tõhi, and osi can be summarized as disturbance, including violent erasure, of the past that create historical ruptures. Archaeological work at Nvnvnyi in some cases commits and in others, exposes episodes of rupture of the four Rs for Ani-Kitu Hwagi communities.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"53 1","pages":"243 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archaeology, Historical Ruptures, and Ani-Kitu Hwagi Memory and Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Russell Townsend, Johi D. Griffin, Kathryn E. Sampeck\",\"doi\":\"10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Comanche scholar and activist LaDonna Harris strongly advocates the recognition and promotion of the four Rs Core Cultural Values: relationships, responsibility, reciprocity, and redistribution. Our contribution discusses the specific forms of each of the four Rs in ᎠᏂᎦᏚᏩᎩ Ani-Kitu Hwagi (Cherokee) practices and ethics of ᎦᏓᎱ (gadahu), ᎦᏚᎩ (gadugi), ᏙᎯ (tõhi), and ᎣᏏ (osi). We present a case study of elements of the history one settlement, ᏅᏅᏁᏱ (Nvnvnyi), as a way to discuss the contemporary reality of heritage management and archaeology's role within that management. Archaeology in Native American communities is often associated with destruction and disruption, so a critical framework that evaluates obliteration is crucial for this specific topic. With the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 and Final Rule in 1995, Ani-Kitu Hwagi people had more say in archaeological activities. Despite this direct oversight, destructive actions to the past and historic resources continues. The countervailing forces to gadahu, gadugi, tõhi, and osi can be summarized as disturbance, including violent erasure, of the past that create historical ruptures. Archaeological work at Nvnvnyi in some cases commits and in others, exposes episodes of rupture of the four Rs for Ani-Kitu Hwagi communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Indian Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Indian Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:科曼奇学者和社会活动家拉多娜·哈里斯强烈主张承认和促进四个r核心文化价值观:关系、责任、互惠和再分配。我们的贡献讨论了四个r中的每一个r的具体形式在 (嘎达胡), (tõhi), (tõhi)和 (osi)的实践和道德规范中(切诺基人)。我们提出了一个关于历史上第一个聚点(Nvnvnyi)的元素的案例研究,作为讨论遗产管理的当代现实和考古学在该管理中的作用的一种方式。美洲原住民社区的考古学通常与破坏和破坏有关,因此评估毁灭的关键框架对于这一特定主题至关重要。随着1990年《美洲原住民坟墓保护及归还法》和1995年《最终规定》的通过,阿尼-基图瓦吉人在考古活动中获得了更多的发言权。尽管有这种直接监督,但对过去和历史资源的破坏行为仍在继续。与gadahu、gadugi、tõhi和osi相抗衡的力量可以概括为对过去的干扰,包括暴力抹去,造成了历史的断裂。在Nvnvnyi的考古工作在某些情况下和其他情况下,揭露了阿尼-基图瓦吉社区的四个r的破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archaeology, Historical Ruptures, and Ani-Kitu Hwagi Memory and Knowledge
Abstract:Comanche scholar and activist LaDonna Harris strongly advocates the recognition and promotion of the four Rs Core Cultural Values: relationships, responsibility, reciprocity, and redistribution. Our contribution discusses the specific forms of each of the four Rs in ᎠᏂᎦᏚᏩᎩ Ani-Kitu Hwagi (Cherokee) practices and ethics of ᎦᏓᎱ (gadahu), ᎦᏚᎩ (gadugi), ᏙᎯ (tõhi), and ᎣᏏ (osi). We present a case study of elements of the history one settlement, ᏅᏅᏁᏱ (Nvnvnyi), as a way to discuss the contemporary reality of heritage management and archaeology's role within that management. Archaeology in Native American communities is often associated with destruction and disruption, so a critical framework that evaluates obliteration is crucial for this specific topic. With the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 and Final Rule in 1995, Ani-Kitu Hwagi people had more say in archaeological activities. Despite this direct oversight, destructive actions to the past and historic resources continues. The countervailing forces to gadahu, gadugi, tõhi, and osi can be summarized as disturbance, including violent erasure, of the past that create historical ruptures. Archaeological work at Nvnvnyi in some cases commits and in others, exposes episodes of rupture of the four Rs for Ani-Kitu Hwagi communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信