约旦立法中的电子提单:与汉堡规则和鹿特丹规则的比较研究

Q3 Social Sciences
Amjad Al-Azzam
{"title":"约旦立法中的电子提单:与汉堡规则和鹿特丹规则的比较研究","authors":"Amjad Al-Azzam","doi":"10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sea bill of lading is the most important maritime transport document. One day, the electronic bill of lading will become the only document used in maritime transport and its paper form will be merely part of history. Continuing to use the paper bill of lading negatively affects foreign trade and maritime transport in Jordan in light of the global trend towards the full use of electronic bills of lading. This study adopted the descriptive analytical approach by analyzing the legal provisions related to dealing with the electronic bills of lading in the Jordanian legislation and comparing them with the rules of Hamburg 1978 and Rotterdam 2008. The study is divided into two sections: the concept of the electronic bill of lading, and the stages of the electronic bill of lading in terms of its issuance, trading, and expiration. The results of the study revealed the possibility of dealing with the electronic bills of lading in Jordan in light of the provisions of Jordanian legislation and the rules of Hamburg 1978. The study recommends encouraging the Jordanian government to ratify the Rotterdam Rules 2008 as the legal structure for electronic bills of lading.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ELECTRONIC BILL OF LADING IN THE JORDANIAN LEGISLATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH HAMBURG AND ROTTERDAM RULES\",\"authors\":\"Amjad Al-Azzam\",\"doi\":\"10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sea bill of lading is the most important maritime transport document. One day, the electronic bill of lading will become the only document used in maritime transport and its paper form will be merely part of history. Continuing to use the paper bill of lading negatively affects foreign trade and maritime transport in Jordan in light of the global trend towards the full use of electronic bills of lading. This study adopted the descriptive analytical approach by analyzing the legal provisions related to dealing with the electronic bills of lading in the Jordanian legislation and comparing them with the rules of Hamburg 1978 and Rotterdam 2008. The study is divided into two sections: the concept of the electronic bill of lading, and the stages of the electronic bill of lading in terms of its issuance, trading, and expiration. The results of the study revealed the possibility of dealing with the electronic bills of lading in Jordan in light of the provisions of Jordanian legislation and the rules of Hamburg 1978. The study recommends encouraging the Jordanian government to ratify the Rotterdam Rules 2008 as the legal structure for electronic bills of lading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海运提单是最重要的海运单证。总有一天,电子提单将成为海上运输中唯一使用的单据,其纸质形式将只是历史的一部分。鉴于全面使用电子提单的全球趋势,继续使用纸质提单对约旦的对外贸易和海上运输产生不利影响。本研究采用描述性分析的方法,通过分析约旦立法中有关处理电子提单的法律规定,并与1978年汉堡和2008年鹿特丹的规则进行比较。本研究分为两个部分:电子提单的概念,以及电子提单的签发、交易和到期阶段。这项研究的结果揭示了根据约旦立法的规定和1978年汉堡规则在约旦处理电子提单的可能性。该研究建议鼓励约旦政府批准《2008年鹿特丹规则》作为电子提单的法律结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ELECTRONIC BILL OF LADING IN THE JORDANIAN LEGISLATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH HAMBURG AND ROTTERDAM RULES
The sea bill of lading is the most important maritime transport document. One day, the electronic bill of lading will become the only document used in maritime transport and its paper form will be merely part of history. Continuing to use the paper bill of lading negatively affects foreign trade and maritime transport in Jordan in light of the global trend towards the full use of electronic bills of lading. This study adopted the descriptive analytical approach by analyzing the legal provisions related to dealing with the electronic bills of lading in the Jordanian legislation and comparing them with the rules of Hamburg 1978 and Rotterdam 2008. The study is divided into two sections: the concept of the electronic bill of lading, and the stages of the electronic bill of lading in terms of its issuance, trading, and expiration. The results of the study revealed the possibility of dealing with the electronic bills of lading in Jordan in light of the provisions of Jordanian legislation and the rules of Hamburg 1978. The study recommends encouraging the Jordanian government to ratify the Rotterdam Rules 2008 as the legal structure for electronic bills of lading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信