E. Podkorytov, M. Šťastný, M. Chvojkova, L. Cejkova, O. H. Asnaz, J. Benedikt, M. Muller, P. Galář, K. Valeš, K. Herynková
{"title":"作为中枢神经系统疾病潜在药物传递系统的硅纳米颗粒类型的比较","authors":"E. Podkorytov, M. Šťastný, M. Chvojkova, L. Cejkova, O. H. Asnaz, J. Benedikt, M. Muller, P. Galář, K. Valeš, K. Herynková","doi":"10.35248/2157-7439.21.12.567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS) are considered to be some of the most debilitating conditions worldwide. The range of standard therapies for disorders affecting CNS is largely limited for many patients. Nonetheless, nanoparticle-based drug delivery offers itself to be a promising strategy for effective drug delivery into the brain, addressing the frequently arising complications with blood-brain barrier crossing. This study compared the drug adsorption ability and the surface chemistry of two types of silicon nanoparticles (Si-NPs). Si- NPs were prepared using two methods: electrochemical etching of Si wafers (Si-E) and low-pressure plasma synthesis (Si-P). Silicon nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nitrogen physisorption (method of Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) and method of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET)). The size and morphology were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) linked with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), respectively. The concentration of the drug substance that was captured by the silicon-based drug delivery system was determined by ultra high-performance liquid-chromatography-diode-array (UHPLC-DAD) method. Results of XPS showed that the Si-E are more oxidized than Si-P. The BET analysis showed us that the Si-E have more surface area, pore volume and grain size then the Si-P, and Si-P have a bigger pore size than Si-E. We also demonstrated by XRD that silicon nanoparticles prepared by both methods have a crystalline structure. The Si-P adsorption analysis of the model compound (ferulic acid) showed better adsorption ability than Si-E. The size of the Si-P (40- 120 nm) was also measured by HRTEM.","PeriodicalId":16532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Si Nanoparticle types for use as a Potencial Drug Delivery System for Central Nervous System Diseases\",\"authors\":\"E. Podkorytov, M. Šťastný, M. Chvojkova, L. Cejkova, O. H. Asnaz, J. Benedikt, M. Muller, P. Galář, K. Valeš, K. Herynková\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2157-7439.21.12.567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS) are considered to be some of the most debilitating conditions worldwide. The range of standard therapies for disorders affecting CNS is largely limited for many patients. Nonetheless, nanoparticle-based drug delivery offers itself to be a promising strategy for effective drug delivery into the brain, addressing the frequently arising complications with blood-brain barrier crossing. This study compared the drug adsorption ability and the surface chemistry of two types of silicon nanoparticles (Si-NPs). Si- NPs were prepared using two methods: electrochemical etching of Si wafers (Si-E) and low-pressure plasma synthesis (Si-P). Silicon nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nitrogen physisorption (method of Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) and method of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET)). The size and morphology were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) linked with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), respectively. The concentration of the drug substance that was captured by the silicon-based drug delivery system was determined by ultra high-performance liquid-chromatography-diode-array (UHPLC-DAD) method. Results of XPS showed that the Si-E are more oxidized than Si-P. The BET analysis showed us that the Si-E have more surface area, pore volume and grain size then the Si-P, and Si-P have a bigger pore size than Si-E. We also demonstrated by XRD that silicon nanoparticles prepared by both methods have a crystalline structure. The Si-P adsorption analysis of the model compound (ferulic acid) showed better adsorption ability than Si-E. The size of the Si-P (40- 120 nm) was also measured by HRTEM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7439.21.12.567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7439.21.12.567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
影响中枢神经系统(CNS)的疾病被认为是世界上最使人衰弱的疾病之一。对于许多患者来说,影响中枢神经系统疾病的标准治疗范围在很大程度上是有限的。尽管如此,基于纳米颗粒的药物递送为有效的药物递送到大脑提供了一种有前途的策略,解决了频繁出现的血脑屏障穿越并发症。本研究比较了两种硅纳米颗粒(Si-NPs)的药物吸附能力和表面化学性质。采用硅晶片电化学刻蚀(Si- e)和低压等离子体合成(Si- p)两种方法制备了Si- NPs。采用x射线光电子能谱(XPS)、x射线衍射(XRD)和氮物理吸附(Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda法(BJH)和Brunauer, Emmett and Teller法(BET))对硅纳米颗粒进行了表征。利用高分辨率透射电子显微镜(HRTEM)、能量色散x射线能谱(EDAX)和动态光散射(DLS)分别对其尺寸和形态进行了表征。采用超高效液相色谱-二极管阵列(UHPLC-DAD)法测定硅基给药系统捕获的原料药的浓度。XPS结果表明Si-E比Si-P更容易被氧化。BET分析表明,Si-E比Si-P具有更大的比表面积、孔隙体积和晶粒尺寸,Si-P比Si-E具有更大的孔径。通过XRD分析表明,两种方法制备的纳米硅均具有晶体结构。模型化合物(阿魏酸)的Si-P吸附性能优于Si-E。用HRTEM测定了Si-P的尺寸(40 ~ 120 nm)。
Comparison of Si Nanoparticle types for use as a Potencial Drug Delivery System for Central Nervous System Diseases
Diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS) are considered to be some of the most debilitating conditions worldwide. The range of standard therapies for disorders affecting CNS is largely limited for many patients. Nonetheless, nanoparticle-based drug delivery offers itself to be a promising strategy for effective drug delivery into the brain, addressing the frequently arising complications with blood-brain barrier crossing. This study compared the drug adsorption ability and the surface chemistry of two types of silicon nanoparticles (Si-NPs). Si- NPs were prepared using two methods: electrochemical etching of Si wafers (Si-E) and low-pressure plasma synthesis (Si-P). Silicon nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nitrogen physisorption (method of Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) and method of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET)). The size and morphology were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) linked with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), respectively. The concentration of the drug substance that was captured by the silicon-based drug delivery system was determined by ultra high-performance liquid-chromatography-diode-array (UHPLC-DAD) method. Results of XPS showed that the Si-E are more oxidized than Si-P. The BET analysis showed us that the Si-E have more surface area, pore volume and grain size then the Si-P, and Si-P have a bigger pore size than Si-E. We also demonstrated by XRD that silicon nanoparticles prepared by both methods have a crystalline structure. The Si-P adsorption analysis of the model compound (ferulic acid) showed better adsorption ability than Si-E. The size of the Si-P (40- 120 nm) was also measured by HRTEM.