在社区肿瘤实践中改变骨髓增生异常综合征的治疗范例:乔治亚州癌症专家的经验

B. Feinberg, J. Gilmore, W. Lenz, C. Franco, Tom Gondesen, M. Saleh
{"title":"在社区肿瘤实践中改变骨髓增生异常综合征的治疗范例:乔治亚州癌症专家的经验","authors":"B. Feinberg, J. Gilmore, W. Lenz, C. Franco, Tom Gondesen, M. Saleh","doi":"10.3816/CLK.2007.N.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Criteria for adoption of new therapies and treatment paradigms in community oncology practices can differ substantively from that of academic medical centers. Differences arise, in part, from the influence of patient mix, available resources and services offered, physician/staff experiences, and the adherence to uniform treatment guidelines. Georgia Cancer Specialists (GCS) is a 31-site community-based group practice with 41 hematologists/oncologists motivated to standardize medical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes and health-care resource utilization. Patients and Methods Using our integrated electronic medical records and billing database (OASIS), we conducted a retrospective evaluation to assess the impact of 3 new agents (decitabine, 5-azacitidine, and lenalidomide) on practice patterns and outcomes in an elderly population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the community setting. From January 2006 to June 2007, data from 1161 patients with MDS (mean age, 71 years; 63% women; 60% Medicare/Medicaid recipients) were collected. Of these, 76 patients (6.5%) received ≥ 1 MDS-indicated therapeutic agent (47% decitabine, 32% 5-azacitidine, 46% lenalidomide; 25% received ≥ 2 agents) for a median of 3, 2, and 3 cycles, respectively. Results In general, the data suggest that patients receiving MDS-therapeutic agents had hematologic improvement and experienced reductions in transfusion requirements. The GCS population and treatment-related data reflect the uptake of new MDS therapeutic agents introduced proactively into a real-world community oncology practice and supplements information from randomized clinical trials. Conclusion Data derived from the community setting have the potential to provide important insights about actual disease prevalence, patient demographics, factors that influence medical careseeking, clinical management, and outcomes outside of academic institutions.","PeriodicalId":100271,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Leukemia","volume":"41 3 1","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Treatment Paradigms for Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Community Oncology Practice: Georgia Cancer Specialists' Experience\",\"authors\":\"B. Feinberg, J. Gilmore, W. Lenz, C. Franco, Tom Gondesen, M. Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.3816/CLK.2007.N.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Criteria for adoption of new therapies and treatment paradigms in community oncology practices can differ substantively from that of academic medical centers. Differences arise, in part, from the influence of patient mix, available resources and services offered, physician/staff experiences, and the adherence to uniform treatment guidelines. Georgia Cancer Specialists (GCS) is a 31-site community-based group practice with 41 hematologists/oncologists motivated to standardize medical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes and health-care resource utilization. Patients and Methods Using our integrated electronic medical records and billing database (OASIS), we conducted a retrospective evaluation to assess the impact of 3 new agents (decitabine, 5-azacitidine, and lenalidomide) on practice patterns and outcomes in an elderly population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the community setting. From January 2006 to June 2007, data from 1161 patients with MDS (mean age, 71 years; 63% women; 60% Medicare/Medicaid recipients) were collected. Of these, 76 patients (6.5%) received ≥ 1 MDS-indicated therapeutic agent (47% decitabine, 32% 5-azacitidine, 46% lenalidomide; 25% received ≥ 2 agents) for a median of 3, 2, and 3 cycles, respectively. Results In general, the data suggest that patients receiving MDS-therapeutic agents had hematologic improvement and experienced reductions in transfusion requirements. The GCS population and treatment-related data reflect the uptake of new MDS therapeutic agents introduced proactively into a real-world community oncology practice and supplements information from randomized clinical trials. Conclusion Data derived from the community setting have the potential to provide important insights about actual disease prevalence, patient demographics, factors that influence medical careseeking, clinical management, and outcomes outside of academic institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"41 3 1\",\"pages\":\"345-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3816/CLK.2007.N.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3816/CLK.2007.N.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在社区肿瘤实践中采用新疗法和治疗范式的标准可能与学术医疗中心的标准有很大不同。产生差异的部分原因是患者组合、现有资源和提供的服务、医生/工作人员经验以及对统一治疗指南的遵守的影响。乔治亚州癌症专家(GCS)是一个由41名血液学家/肿瘤学家组成的31个社区团体,旨在标准化医疗决策,优化患者预后和医疗资源利用。患者和方法使用我们的综合电子医疗记录和计费数据库(OASIS),我们进行了一项回顾性评估,以评估3种新药(地西他滨、5-阿扎胞苷和来那度胺)对社区中老年骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的治疗模式和结果的影响。2006年1月至2007年6月,1161例MDS患者(平均年龄71岁;63%的女性;60%的医疗保险/医疗补助接受者)被收集。其中,76例(6.5%)患者接受了≥1种mds指示的治疗药物(47%地西他滨,32% 5-阿扎胞苷,46%来那度胺;25%的患者接受≥2种药物治疗),中位数分别为3、2和3个周期。结果总的来说,数据表明接受mds治疗的患者血液学改善,输血需求减少。GCS人群和治疗相关数据反映了新的MDS治疗剂被主动引入现实世界的社区肿瘤学实践,并补充了随机临床试验的信息。结论:来自社区环境的数据有可能提供关于实际疾病患病率、患者人口统计学、影响医疗保健的因素、临床管理和学术机构以外的结果的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Treatment Paradigms for Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Community Oncology Practice: Georgia Cancer Specialists' Experience
Abstract Background Criteria for adoption of new therapies and treatment paradigms in community oncology practices can differ substantively from that of academic medical centers. Differences arise, in part, from the influence of patient mix, available resources and services offered, physician/staff experiences, and the adherence to uniform treatment guidelines. Georgia Cancer Specialists (GCS) is a 31-site community-based group practice with 41 hematologists/oncologists motivated to standardize medical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes and health-care resource utilization. Patients and Methods Using our integrated electronic medical records and billing database (OASIS), we conducted a retrospective evaluation to assess the impact of 3 new agents (decitabine, 5-azacitidine, and lenalidomide) on practice patterns and outcomes in an elderly population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the community setting. From January 2006 to June 2007, data from 1161 patients with MDS (mean age, 71 years; 63% women; 60% Medicare/Medicaid recipients) were collected. Of these, 76 patients (6.5%) received ≥ 1 MDS-indicated therapeutic agent (47% decitabine, 32% 5-azacitidine, 46% lenalidomide; 25% received ≥ 2 agents) for a median of 3, 2, and 3 cycles, respectively. Results In general, the data suggest that patients receiving MDS-therapeutic agents had hematologic improvement and experienced reductions in transfusion requirements. The GCS population and treatment-related data reflect the uptake of new MDS therapeutic agents introduced proactively into a real-world community oncology practice and supplements information from randomized clinical trials. Conclusion Data derived from the community setting have the potential to provide important insights about actual disease prevalence, patient demographics, factors that influence medical careseeking, clinical management, and outcomes outside of academic institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信