Hoon Jang , Hee Nam Moon , Jung Im Kim , Sang Rak Bae , Chang Hee Han , Bong Hee Park
{"title":"直肠内加热利多卡因凝胶和前列腺周围神经阻滞在经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中疼痛控制的比较:一项随机对照非劣效性试验","authors":"Hoon Jang , Hee Nam Moon , Jung Im Kim , Sang Rak Bae , Chang Hee Han , Bong Hee Park","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To investigate whether intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (IRLAH) is non-inferior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for reducing pain in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 100 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from August 2019 to July 2020. These participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40°C) 2% lidocaine gel (n = 50) or PNB (n = 50). The primary outcome was a pain score on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points with the non-inferiority margin of 1; VAS-1: during local anesthesia application; VAS-2: during probe insertion; VAS-3: during biopsy; VAS-4: 30 minutes after the procedure. The secondary outcome included complications during and after the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The IRLAH group (0.1) met non-inferiority as well as superiority criteria for mean VAS-1 score vs. the PNB group (2.33) (<em>P</em> < 0.001), as the difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between the two groups was −2.23 (−2.66 to −1.79) and the upper bound of the 95% CI were both below the prespecified non-inferiority margin and below zero. For mean VAS-3 score, the difference (95% CI) was 0.3 (−0.38 to 0.98) and the upper bound of the 95% CI did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin indicating that IRLAH was non-inferior (IRLAH group, 3.44; PNB group, 3.14). Also, non-inferiority was shown for pain scores at VAS-2 and VAS-4. There were no significant differences in complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IRLAH is a noninvasive and non-inferior alternative to PNB for pain control in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy without increased risk of complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/80/main.PMC9995686.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial\",\"authors\":\"Hoon Jang , Hee Nam Moon , Jung Im Kim , Sang Rak Bae , Chang Hee Han , Bong Hee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To investigate whether intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (IRLAH) is non-inferior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for reducing pain in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 100 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from August 2019 to July 2020. These participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40°C) 2% lidocaine gel (n = 50) or PNB (n = 50). The primary outcome was a pain score on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points with the non-inferiority margin of 1; VAS-1: during local anesthesia application; VAS-2: during probe insertion; VAS-3: during biopsy; VAS-4: 30 minutes after the procedure. The secondary outcome included complications during and after the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The IRLAH group (0.1) met non-inferiority as well as superiority criteria for mean VAS-1 score vs. the PNB group (2.33) (<em>P</em> < 0.001), as the difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between the two groups was −2.23 (−2.66 to −1.79) and the upper bound of the 95% CI were both below the prespecified non-inferiority margin and below zero. For mean VAS-3 score, the difference (95% CI) was 0.3 (−0.38 to 0.98) and the upper bound of the 95% CI did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin indicating that IRLAH was non-inferior (IRLAH group, 3.44; PNB group, 3.14). Also, non-inferiority was shown for pain scores at VAS-2 and VAS-4. There were no significant differences in complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IRLAH is a noninvasive and non-inferior alternative to PNB for pain control in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy without increased risk of complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 8-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/80/main.PMC9995686.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Background
To investigate whether intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (IRLAH) is non-inferior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for reducing pain in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.
Methods
We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 100 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from August 2019 to July 2020. These participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40°C) 2% lidocaine gel (n = 50) or PNB (n = 50). The primary outcome was a pain score on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points with the non-inferiority margin of 1; VAS-1: during local anesthesia application; VAS-2: during probe insertion; VAS-3: during biopsy; VAS-4: 30 minutes after the procedure. The secondary outcome included complications during and after the procedure.
Results
The IRLAH group (0.1) met non-inferiority as well as superiority criteria for mean VAS-1 score vs. the PNB group (2.33) (P < 0.001), as the difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between the two groups was −2.23 (−2.66 to −1.79) and the upper bound of the 95% CI were both below the prespecified non-inferiority margin and below zero. For mean VAS-3 score, the difference (95% CI) was 0.3 (−0.38 to 0.98) and the upper bound of the 95% CI did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin indicating that IRLAH was non-inferior (IRLAH group, 3.44; PNB group, 3.14). Also, non-inferiority was shown for pain scores at VAS-2 and VAS-4. There were no significant differences in complications.
Conclusion
IRLAH is a noninvasive and non-inferior alternative to PNB for pain control in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy without increased risk of complications.
期刊介绍:
Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...