{"title":"喜剧作为有意主体的损害","authors":"M. Otero","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn este articulo presento, clarifico y exploro algunas virtudes potenciales de una determinada teoria —de caracter intencionalista— sobre lo comico. Su tesis minima principal establece una condicion necesaria para la comicidad: quien evaluaaprecia una situacion como humoristica/comica reconoce un perjuicio o dano ocasionado a ciertos sujetos intencionales (pueden ser sujetos involucrados en la situacion comica, o el propio evaluador-apreciador). Una version mas fuerte establece que la comicidad deriva (al menos en parte) de dicho perjuicio. El perjuicio es aquello que, cuando se combina con otros factores, encontramos humoristico/comico. Clarificar la teoria conlleva una tarea de comparacion con otras concepciones del humor, en particular, con la teoria de la incongruencia EnglishIn this article, I present, clarify and explore some potential virtues of a particular theory —of an intentional character— about comicity. Its principal minimal thesis posits a necessary condition for comicity: the thinker who appraises a situation as comic recognizes a hurt or damage against certain intentional subjects (they may be subjects involved in the comic situation, or the appraiser himself). A stronger version claims that comicity proceeds (partially, at least) from that hurt; it is the hurt itself that, when combined with other factors, we find comic. The task of clarifying the theory involves to compare it with other views on humor, in particular the incongruity theory","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"26 1","pages":"43-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La comicidad como perjuicio de sujetos intencionales\",\"authors\":\"M. Otero\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEn este articulo presento, clarifico y exploro algunas virtudes potenciales de una determinada teoria —de caracter intencionalista— sobre lo comico. Su tesis minima principal establece una condicion necesaria para la comicidad: quien evaluaaprecia una situacion como humoristica/comica reconoce un perjuicio o dano ocasionado a ciertos sujetos intencionales (pueden ser sujetos involucrados en la situacion comica, o el propio evaluador-apreciador). Una version mas fuerte establece que la comicidad deriva (al menos en parte) de dicho perjuicio. El perjuicio es aquello que, cuando se combina con otros factores, encontramos humoristico/comico. Clarificar la teoria conlleva una tarea de comparacion con otras concepciones del humor, en particular, con la teoria de la incongruencia EnglishIn this article, I present, clarify and explore some potential virtues of a particular theory —of an intentional character— about comicity. Its principal minimal thesis posits a necessary condition for comicity: the thinker who appraises a situation as comic recognizes a hurt or damage against certain intentional subjects (they may be subjects involved in the comic situation, or the appraiser himself). A stronger version claims that comicity proceeds (partially, at least) from that hurt; it is the hurt itself that, when combined with other factors, we find comic. The task of clarifying the theory involves to compare it with other views on humor, in particular the incongruity theory\",\"PeriodicalId\":43820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"43-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.15\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我提出,澄清和探索一些潜在的美德,一个特定的理论-意图主义特征-关于喜剧。他的主要最低论点建立了喜剧的必要条件:那些以幽默/喜剧的方式评估情境的人承认对某些有意的主体造成了伤害或伤害(他们可能是情景喜剧中的主体,也可能是评估者/鉴定家自己)。一种更强烈的说法是,喜剧(至少部分)来源于这种偏见。伤害是指当与其他因素结合时,我们发现幽默/喜剧的东西。澄清理论需要与幽默的其他概念进行比较,特别是与不一致理论进行比较。在这篇文章中,我提出、澄清和探索关于喜剧的特定理论的一些潜在优点。其主要最少thesis posits必要condition for comicity:思想家appraises》漫画,长期recognizes一定intentional hurt or damage against / l (they may be publication参与漫画状况,or the appraiser himself)。加强version claims that comicity收益(partially,至少)from that hurt;这是一种伤害,当结合其他因素时,我们可以找到喜剧。The task of clarifying The theory涉及it to compare with other关于幽默,尤其是incongruity理论
La comicidad como perjuicio de sujetos intencionales
espanolEn este articulo presento, clarifico y exploro algunas virtudes potenciales de una determinada teoria —de caracter intencionalista— sobre lo comico. Su tesis minima principal establece una condicion necesaria para la comicidad: quien evaluaaprecia una situacion como humoristica/comica reconoce un perjuicio o dano ocasionado a ciertos sujetos intencionales (pueden ser sujetos involucrados en la situacion comica, o el propio evaluador-apreciador). Una version mas fuerte establece que la comicidad deriva (al menos en parte) de dicho perjuicio. El perjuicio es aquello que, cuando se combina con otros factores, encontramos humoristico/comico. Clarificar la teoria conlleva una tarea de comparacion con otras concepciones del humor, en particular, con la teoria de la incongruencia EnglishIn this article, I present, clarify and explore some potential virtues of a particular theory —of an intentional character— about comicity. Its principal minimal thesis posits a necessary condition for comicity: the thinker who appraises a situation as comic recognizes a hurt or damage against certain intentional subjects (they may be subjects involved in the comic situation, or the appraiser himself). A stronger version claims that comicity proceeds (partially, at least) from that hurt; it is the hurt itself that, when combined with other factors, we find comic. The task of clarifying the theory involves to compare it with other views on humor, in particular the incongruity theory