ArchiMate风险模型的本体分析与再设计

T. P. Sales, J. P. Almeida, S. Santini, F. Baião, G. Guizzardi
{"title":"ArchiMate风险模型的本体分析与再设计","authors":"T. P. Sales, J. P. Almeida, S. Santini, F. Baião, G. Guizzardi","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.2018.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk analysis is a complex and critical activity in various contexts, ranging from strategic planning to IT systems operation. Given its complexity, several Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks and modeling languages have been developed to help analysts in representing and analyzing risks. Yet, the notion of risk remains overloaded and conceptually unclear in most of them. In this paper, we investigate the real-world semantics underlying risk-related constructs in one of such approaches, namely ArchiMate's Risk and Security Overlay (RSO). We perform this investigation by means of ontological analysis to reveal semantic limitations in the overlay, such as ambiguity and missing constructs. Building on the results of this analysis, we propose a well-founded redesign of the risk modeling aspects of the RSO.","PeriodicalId":6544,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ontological Analysis and Redesign of Risk Modeling in ArchiMate\",\"authors\":\"T. P. Sales, J. P. Almeida, S. Santini, F. Baião, G. Guizzardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC.2018.00028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Risk analysis is a complex and critical activity in various contexts, ranging from strategic planning to IT systems operation. Given its complexity, several Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks and modeling languages have been developed to help analysts in representing and analyzing risks. Yet, the notion of risk remains overloaded and conceptually unclear in most of them. In this paper, we investigate the real-world semantics underlying risk-related constructs in one of such approaches, namely ArchiMate's Risk and Security Overlay (RSO). We perform this investigation by means of ontological analysis to reveal semantic limitations in the overlay, such as ambiguity and missing constructs. Building on the results of this analysis, we propose a well-founded redesign of the risk modeling aspects of the RSO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

从战略规划到IT系统操作,风险分析在各种情况下都是一项复杂而关键的活动。鉴于其复杂性,已经开发了一些企业架构(EA)框架和建模语言来帮助分析人员表示和分析风险。然而,风险的概念在大多数情况下仍然是超负荷的,并且在概念上不明确。在本文中,我们研究了其中一种方法中风险相关结构的真实世界语义,即ArchiMate的风险和安全覆盖(RSO)。我们通过本体论分析来进行这项调查,以揭示覆盖中的语义限制,如歧义和缺失结构。在此分析结果的基础上,我们建议对RSO的风险建模方面进行有充分根据的重新设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ontological Analysis and Redesign of Risk Modeling in ArchiMate
Risk analysis is a complex and critical activity in various contexts, ranging from strategic planning to IT systems operation. Given its complexity, several Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks and modeling languages have been developed to help analysts in representing and analyzing risks. Yet, the notion of risk remains overloaded and conceptually unclear in most of them. In this paper, we investigate the real-world semantics underlying risk-related constructs in one of such approaches, namely ArchiMate's Risk and Security Overlay (RSO). We perform this investigation by means of ontological analysis to reveal semantic limitations in the overlay, such as ambiguity and missing constructs. Building on the results of this analysis, we propose a well-founded redesign of the risk modeling aspects of the RSO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信