日本一项心脏立体定向体放疗治疗难治性室性心动过速的II期试验的中期报告-重点是目标确定。

Mari Amino, Shigeto Kabuki, Etsuo Kunieda, Jun Hashimoto, Akitomo Sugawara, Tetsuri Sakai, Susumu Sakama, Kengo Ayabe, Yohei Ohno, Atsuhiko Yagishita, Yoshinori Kobayashi, Yuji Ikari, Koichiro Yoshioka
{"title":"日本一项心脏立体定向体放疗治疗难治性室性心动过速的II期试验的中期报告-重点是目标确定。","authors":"Mari Amino,&nbsp;Shigeto Kabuki,&nbsp;Etsuo Kunieda,&nbsp;Jun Hashimoto,&nbsp;Akitomo Sugawara,&nbsp;Tetsuri Sakai,&nbsp;Susumu Sakama,&nbsp;Kengo Ayabe,&nbsp;Yohei Ohno,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Yagishita,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yuji Ikari,&nbsp;Koichiro Yoshioka","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiac radiotherapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, a standardized protocol and software program for determining the irradiation target have not been established. Here, we report the first preclinical stereotactic radioregulation antiarrhythmic therapy trial in Japan, focused on the target-setting process. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> From 2019 onwards, 3 patients (age range 60-91 years) presenting with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled. Two patients were extremely serious and urgent, and were followed up for 6 and 30 months. To determine the irradiation targets, we aggregated electrophysiological, structural, and functional data and reflected them in an American Heart Association 17-segment model, as per the current recommendations. However, in all 3 patients, invasive electrophysiological study, phase-contrast computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed; therefore, electrophysiological and structural information was limited. As alternatives, high-resolution ambulatory electrocardiography and nuclear medicine studies were useful in assessing arrhythmic substrates; however, concerns regarding test weighting and multiple scoring remain. Risks to surrounding organs were fully taken into account. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients requiring cardiac SBRT, the information needed for target planning is sometimes limited to minimally invasive tests. Although there are issues to be resolved, this is a promising option for the life-saving treatment of patients in critical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 3","pages":"69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/6e/circrep-5-69.PMC9992511.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia - Focus on Target Determination.\",\"authors\":\"Mari Amino,&nbsp;Shigeto Kabuki,&nbsp;Etsuo Kunieda,&nbsp;Jun Hashimoto,&nbsp;Akitomo Sugawara,&nbsp;Tetsuri Sakai,&nbsp;Susumu Sakama,&nbsp;Kengo Ayabe,&nbsp;Yohei Ohno,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Yagishita,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yuji Ikari,&nbsp;Koichiro Yoshioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiac radiotherapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, a standardized protocol and software program for determining the irradiation target have not been established. Here, we report the first preclinical stereotactic radioregulation antiarrhythmic therapy trial in Japan, focused on the target-setting process. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> From 2019 onwards, 3 patients (age range 60-91 years) presenting with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled. Two patients were extremely serious and urgent, and were followed up for 6 and 30 months. To determine the irradiation targets, we aggregated electrophysiological, structural, and functional data and reflected them in an American Heart Association 17-segment model, as per the current recommendations. However, in all 3 patients, invasive electrophysiological study, phase-contrast computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed; therefore, electrophysiological and structural information was limited. As alternatives, high-resolution ambulatory electrocardiography and nuclear medicine studies were useful in assessing arrhythmic substrates; however, concerns regarding test weighting and multiple scoring remain. Risks to surrounding organs were fully taken into account. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients requiring cardiac SBRT, the information needed for target planning is sometimes limited to minimally invasive tests. Although there are issues to be resolved, this is a promising option for the life-saving treatment of patients in critical situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"69-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/6e/circrep-5-69.PMC9992511.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)作为一种微创治疗难治性室性心动过速的心脏放疗方法受到了广泛关注。然而,确定辐照目标的标准化方案和软件程序尚未建立。在这里,我们报告了日本的第一个临床前立体定向放射调节抗心律失常治疗试验,重点关注目标设定过程。方法和结果:从2019年起,纳入3例缺血性或非缺血性心肌病患者(年龄60-91岁)。其中2例为特重急症,随访6个月和30个月。为了确定照射目标,我们汇总了电生理、结构和功能数据,并按照目前的建议将其反映在美国心脏协会的17段模型中。然而,在所有3例患者中,均无法进行有创电生理研究、相对比计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像;因此,电生理和结构信息是有限的。作为替代方案,高分辨率动态心电图和核医学研究可用于评估心律失常底物;然而,关于考试权重和多重评分的担忧仍然存在。充分考虑了对周围器官的风险。结论:在需要心脏SBRT的患者中,目标规划所需的信息有时仅限于微创检查。虽然还有一些问题需要解决,但这是一个很有希望的选择,可以挽救危重患者的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia - Focus on Target Determination.

Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia - Focus on Target Determination.

Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia - Focus on Target Determination.

Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia - Focus on Target Determination.

Background: Cardiac radiotherapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, a standardized protocol and software program for determining the irradiation target have not been established. Here, we report the first preclinical stereotactic radioregulation antiarrhythmic therapy trial in Japan, focused on the target-setting process. Methods and Results: From 2019 onwards, 3 patients (age range 60-91 years) presenting with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled. Two patients were extremely serious and urgent, and were followed up for 6 and 30 months. To determine the irradiation targets, we aggregated electrophysiological, structural, and functional data and reflected them in an American Heart Association 17-segment model, as per the current recommendations. However, in all 3 patients, invasive electrophysiological study, phase-contrast computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed; therefore, electrophysiological and structural information was limited. As alternatives, high-resolution ambulatory electrocardiography and nuclear medicine studies were useful in assessing arrhythmic substrates; however, concerns regarding test weighting and multiple scoring remain. Risks to surrounding organs were fully taken into account. Conclusions: In patients requiring cardiac SBRT, the information needed for target planning is sometimes limited to minimally invasive tests. Although there are issues to be resolved, this is a promising option for the life-saving treatment of patients in critical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信