用于裂变径迹研究的几何因素的定量评估

P.F. Green, S.A. Durrani
{"title":"用于裂变径迹研究的几何因素的定量评估","authors":"P.F. Green,&nbsp;S.A. Durrani","doi":"10.1016/0145-224X(78)90025-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Various reasons are analysed for finding values of the geometry factor <em>G</em> in fission track dating (i.e. the ratio of track density in an “external” to that in an “internal” surface) to be greater than the “ideal” value of 0.5. It is shown that revelation of “new” tracks by prolonged etching is a minor effect, and that the effects of the minimum observable track length and differing distributions of etched track length in different surfaces are the major causes of values of <em>G</em> ≫ 0.5. It is also shown experimentally that with modern equipment, which allows tracks of ∼0.5 μm length to be resolved, it is possible to obtain values of <em>G</em> ∼ 0.5, and the use of this “ideal” value introduces little error in the final analysis. The behaviour of some other geometry ratios is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100974,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Track Detection","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 207-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0145-224X(78)90025-X","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative assessment of geometry factors for use in fission track studies\",\"authors\":\"P.F. Green,&nbsp;S.A. Durrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0145-224X(78)90025-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Various reasons are analysed for finding values of the geometry factor <em>G</em> in fission track dating (i.e. the ratio of track density in an “external” to that in an “internal” surface) to be greater than the “ideal” value of 0.5. It is shown that revelation of “new” tracks by prolonged etching is a minor effect, and that the effects of the minimum observable track length and differing distributions of etched track length in different surfaces are the major causes of values of <em>G</em> ≫ 0.5. It is also shown experimentally that with modern equipment, which allows tracks of ∼0.5 μm length to be resolved, it is possible to obtain values of <em>G</em> ∼ 0.5, and the use of this “ideal” value introduces little error in the final analysis. The behaviour of some other geometry ratios is also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Track Detection\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0145-224X(78)90025-X\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Track Detection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145224X7890025X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Track Detection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145224X7890025X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

分析了在裂变径迹测年中发现几何因子G值(即“外”表面的径迹密度与“内”表面的径迹密度之比)大于“理想”值0.5的各种原因。结果表明,长时间蚀刻对“新”径迹的暴露影响较小,最小可观测径迹长度和不同表面上蚀刻径迹长度的不同分布是导致G值> 0.5的主要原因。实验还表明,使用允许解析~ 0.5 μm长度的迹线的现代设备,可以获得G ~ 0.5的值,并且使用这个“理想”值在最终分析中引入的误差很小。本文还讨论了其它几何比的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quantitative assessment of geometry factors for use in fission track studies

Various reasons are analysed for finding values of the geometry factor G in fission track dating (i.e. the ratio of track density in an “external” to that in an “internal” surface) to be greater than the “ideal” value of 0.5. It is shown that revelation of “new” tracks by prolonged etching is a minor effect, and that the effects of the minimum observable track length and differing distributions of etched track length in different surfaces are the major causes of values of G ≫ 0.5. It is also shown experimentally that with modern equipment, which allows tracks of ∼0.5 μm length to be resolved, it is possible to obtain values of G ∼ 0.5, and the use of this “ideal” value introduces little error in the final analysis. The behaviour of some other geometry ratios is also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信