富有成果的身体:法利,科普兰和鲍德温在神圣的肉体上

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Adam Beyt
{"title":"富有成果的身体:法利,科普兰和鲍德温在神圣的肉体上","authors":"Adam Beyt","doi":"10.1080/13558358.2019.1640922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses the notion of theological imagination, a term describing how the divine interacts with the human on an emotional and embodied level, to bring Margaret Farley, M. Shawn Copeland, and James Baldwin into conversation with each other regarding sexual ethics. In trying to expand descriptions of grace to non-heterosexual relational configurations within the Roman Catholic tradition, Farley, in her book Just Love, suggests the term “pro-creative” should be formulated as “fruitful.” While this term validates the grace found in many relationships, her articulation of “commitment” reifies privileges afforded to monogamous marriages, thus marginalizing “queer” relationships. As a potential solution to this problem, this article uses the theological imagination of the writings of Copeland and Baldwin to illustrate how different forms of relational configurations can be “fruitful” without conforming to normative versions of “commitment.”","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":"58 1","pages":"45 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fruitful bodies: Farley, Copeland, and Baldwin on sacred flesh\",\"authors\":\"Adam Beyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13558358.2019.1640922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article uses the notion of theological imagination, a term describing how the divine interacts with the human on an emotional and embodied level, to bring Margaret Farley, M. Shawn Copeland, and James Baldwin into conversation with each other regarding sexual ethics. In trying to expand descriptions of grace to non-heterosexual relational configurations within the Roman Catholic tradition, Farley, in her book Just Love, suggests the term “pro-creative” should be formulated as “fruitful.” While this term validates the grace found in many relationships, her articulation of “commitment” reifies privileges afforded to monogamous marriages, thus marginalizing “queer” relationships. As a potential solution to this problem, this article uses the theological imagination of the writings of Copeland and Baldwin to illustrate how different forms of relational configurations can be “fruitful” without conforming to normative versions of “commitment.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":42039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1640922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1640922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用神学想象的概念,一个描述神如何在情感和具体层面上与人类相互作用的术语,将玛格丽特法利,M.肖恩科普兰和詹姆斯鲍德温带入关于性伦理的对话中。在试图将恩典的描述扩展到罗马天主教传统中的非异性关系配置时,法利在她的书《Just Love》中建议,“亲创造性”一词应该被表述为“富有成效”。虽然这个词证实了在许多关系中发现的优雅,但她对“承诺”的阐述具体化了一夫一妻制婚姻的特权,从而边缘化了“酷儿”关系。作为这个问题的潜在解决方案,本文使用了科普兰和鲍德温著作的神学想象来说明不同形式的关系配置如何在不符合“承诺”的规范版本的情况下“富有成果”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fruitful bodies: Farley, Copeland, and Baldwin on sacred flesh
ABSTRACT This article uses the notion of theological imagination, a term describing how the divine interacts with the human on an emotional and embodied level, to bring Margaret Farley, M. Shawn Copeland, and James Baldwin into conversation with each other regarding sexual ethics. In trying to expand descriptions of grace to non-heterosexual relational configurations within the Roman Catholic tradition, Farley, in her book Just Love, suggests the term “pro-creative” should be formulated as “fruitful.” While this term validates the grace found in many relationships, her articulation of “commitment” reifies privileges afforded to monogamous marriages, thus marginalizing “queer” relationships. As a potential solution to this problem, this article uses the theological imagination of the writings of Copeland and Baldwin to illustrate how different forms of relational configurations can be “fruitful” without conforming to normative versions of “commitment.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信