论知识产权的客体概念

I. Ovchinnikov
{"title":"论知识产权的客体概念","authors":"I. Ovchinnikov","doi":"10.31857/s102694520020813-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the concept of intellectual rights, introduced by Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to denote the totality of intellectual property rights. The author argues its independence among subjective civil rights not only from property rights, but also from the rights of personality. The development of European Civil Law of the XIX century that led to steady decline of the proprietary theory of intellectual property, simultaneously led to the formation of the theory of personality rights in relation to artistic work. This theory, which understood the work as a continuation of the author’s self, still exerts its influence upon Russian Civil Law and leads to the confusion of intellectual property with inalienable attributes of personality (intangible goods) in the system of objects of civil rights.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the concept of intellectual rights in the light of their object\",\"authors\":\"I. Ovchinnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520020813-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the concept of intellectual rights, introduced by Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to denote the totality of intellectual property rights. The author argues its independence among subjective civil rights not only from property rights, but also from the rights of personality. The development of European Civil Law of the XIX century that led to steady decline of the proprietary theory of intellectual property, simultaneously led to the formation of the theory of personality rights in relation to artistic work. This theory, which understood the work as a continuation of the author’s self, still exerts its influence upon Russian Civil Law and leads to the confusion of intellectual property with inalienable attributes of personality (intangible goods) in the system of objects of civil rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520020813-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520020813-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了俄罗斯联邦民法典第4部分引入的知识产权概念,以表示知识产权的总体。作者认为,它不仅独立于财产权,而且独立于人格权,独立于民事主观权利。19世纪欧洲民法的发展导致了知识产权所有权理论的不断衰落,同时也导致了艺术作品人格权理论的形成。这一理论将作品理解为作者自我的延续,至今仍对俄罗斯民法产生影响,并导致知识产权与不可剥夺的人格属性(无形财产)在民事权利客体制度中的混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the concept of intellectual rights in the light of their object
This article explores the concept of intellectual rights, introduced by Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to denote the totality of intellectual property rights. The author argues its independence among subjective civil rights not only from property rights, but also from the rights of personality. The development of European Civil Law of the XIX century that led to steady decline of the proprietary theory of intellectual property, simultaneously led to the formation of the theory of personality rights in relation to artistic work. This theory, which understood the work as a continuation of the author’s self, still exerts its influence upon Russian Civil Law and leads to the confusion of intellectual property with inalienable attributes of personality (intangible goods) in the system of objects of civil rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信