铁路行业风险分担安排下的合作

IF 1.9 Q3 BUSINESS

International Journal of the Economics of Business Pub Date : 2019-02-12 DOI:10.1080/13571516.2018.1524702

Mahito Okura

{"title":"铁路行业风险分担安排下的合作","authors":"Mahito Okura","doi":"10.1080/13571516.2018.1524702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main purpose of this study was to investigate coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement in the railroad industry. The study discusses whether railroad companies voluntarily sign free alternative transportation contracts, which are contracts where non-suspended lines provide railroad services to affected passengers when some lines are suspended. The main results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, railroad companies do voluntarily wish to sign free alternative transportation contracts. In other words, coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement is always realized. Second, in the case of a monopolistic line, when the probability of an accident occurring is relatively high, it is desirable for policy makers to provide a new line and achieve a risk-pooling arrangement.","PeriodicalId":45470,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Economics of Business","volume":"42 1","pages":"233 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coopetition with a Risk-Pooling Arrangement in the Railroad Industry\",\"authors\":\"Mahito Okura\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13571516.2018.1524702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The main purpose of this study was to investigate coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement in the railroad industry. The study discusses whether railroad companies voluntarily sign free alternative transportation contracts, which are contracts where non-suspended lines provide railroad services to affected passengers when some lines are suspended. The main results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, railroad companies do voluntarily wish to sign free alternative transportation contracts. In other words, coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement is always realized. Second, in the case of a monopolistic line, when the probability of an accident occurring is relatively high, it is desirable for policy makers to provide a new line and achieve a risk-pooling arrangement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of the Economics of Business\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of the Economics of Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1524702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Economics of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1524702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的主要目的是探讨铁路行业风险分担安排下的合作。该研究讨论了铁路公司是否自愿签署免费替代运输合同，即在部分线路停运时，非停运线路为受影响的乘客提供铁路服务的合同。本研究的主要结果可以总结如下。首先，铁路公司确实自愿希望签订免费的替代运输合同。换句话说，风险分担安排下的合作总是可以实现的。其次，在垄断线路的情况下，当事故发生的可能性相对较高时，政策制定者希望提供一条新的线路，实现风险分担安排。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Coopetition with a Risk-Pooling Arrangement in the Railroad Industry

Abstract The main purpose of this study was to investigate coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement in the railroad industry. The study discusses whether railroad companies voluntarily sign free alternative transportation contracts, which are contracts where non-suspended lines provide railroad services to affected passengers when some lines are suspended. The main results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, railroad companies do voluntarily wish to sign free alternative transportation contracts. In other words, coopetition with a risk-pooling arrangement is always realized. Second, in the case of a monopolistic line, when the probability of an accident occurring is relatively high, it is desirable for policy makers to provide a new line and achieve a risk-pooling arrangement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of the Economics of Business BUSINESS-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Journal of the Economics of Business presents original, peer reviewed research in economics that is clearly applicable to business or related public policy problems or issues. The term "business" is used in its widest sense to encompass both public and private sector—governmental, private non-profit and cooperative organizations, as well as profit-seeking enterprises. International Journal of the Economics of Business carries papers relating to three main spheres: The organization—to analyse and aid decision making and the internal organization of the business; The industry—to analyse how businesses interact and evolve within and across industries.