歧视与保险

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
R. Avraham
{"title":"歧视与保险","authors":"R. Avraham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3089946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it fair and just to charge men and women identical life insurance premiums despite their different actuarial risk? What about charging the old and the young different premiums? As entities whose core business is to classify people based on their actuarial risk, should private insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate between various groups? To answer these and various other questions, I start this chapter by revealing the complete confusion that exists in the legal terrain with respect to antidiscrimination norms in insurance. I then show how philosophers writing about discrimination mostly have been writing at a level of abstraction so high that it comfortably ignores relevant nuances, thus making the entire literature largely useless for any insurance-related policy-making purposes. I conclude by proposing a theoretical framework that can help policy makers apply a fair and just anti-discrimination policy.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination and Insurance\",\"authors\":\"R. Avraham\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3089946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it fair and just to charge men and women identical life insurance premiums despite their different actuarial risk? What about charging the old and the young different premiums? As entities whose core business is to classify people based on their actuarial risk, should private insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate between various groups? To answer these and various other questions, I start this chapter by revealing the complete confusion that exists in the legal terrain with respect to antidiscrimination norms in insurance. I then show how philosophers writing about discrimination mostly have been writing at a level of abstraction so high that it comfortably ignores relevant nuances, thus making the entire literature largely useless for any insurance-related policy-making purposes. I conclude by proposing a theoretical framework that can help policy makers apply a fair and just anti-discrimination policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

尽管男性和女性的精算风险不同,但收取相同的人寿保险费是否公平公正?对老年人和年轻人收取不同的保费怎么样?私营保险公司的核心业务是根据精算风险对人群进行分类,是否应允许私营保险公司区别对待不同的群体?为了回答这些问题和其他各种各样的问题,我在本章开始时揭示了在法律领域中存在的关于保险反歧视规范的完全混乱。然后,我展示了哲学家们在写关于歧视的文章时,大多是在一个如此抽象的水平上写作的,以至于它轻松地忽略了相关的细微差别,从而使整个文献在很大程度上对任何与保险相关的政策制定目的毫无用处。最后,我提出了一个理论框架,可以帮助政策制定者实施公平公正的反歧视政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrimination and Insurance
Is it fair and just to charge men and women identical life insurance premiums despite their different actuarial risk? What about charging the old and the young different premiums? As entities whose core business is to classify people based on their actuarial risk, should private insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate between various groups? To answer these and various other questions, I start this chapter by revealing the complete confusion that exists in the legal terrain with respect to antidiscrimination norms in insurance. I then show how philosophers writing about discrimination mostly have been writing at a level of abstraction so high that it comfortably ignores relevant nuances, thus making the entire literature largely useless for any insurance-related policy-making purposes. I conclude by proposing a theoretical framework that can help policy makers apply a fair and just anti-discrimination policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信