伊朗一儿科重症监护病房机械通气患儿的临床特点和并发症:比较不同模式

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Touran Chegeni, M. Olfat, B. Yaghmaie, Seyed Abbas Hassani, Meisam Sharifzadeh, Z. Najafi, M. Mohammadpour
{"title":"伊朗一儿科重症监护病房机械通气患儿的临床特点和并发症:比较不同模式","authors":"Touran Chegeni, M. Olfat, B. Yaghmaie, Seyed Abbas Hassani, Meisam Sharifzadeh, Z. Najafi, M. Mohammadpour","doi":"10.5812/ijp-119875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is among the most common therapeutic modalities in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), which works based on a defined ventilation mode. Nowadays, conventional and alternative modes including adaptive pressure control (APC) and non-APC modes are frequently employed. Although MV can be helpful in many cases, it may cause some complications resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the demographic features and complications of mechanically ventilated children in a PICU in Iran, as well as to compare different ventilation modes. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in PICUs of children’s medical center hospital - a tertiary referral pediatric hospital. Results: Of 66 patients included in this study, 33 patients were treated with APC modes, whereas 33 patients were treated with non-APC modes. The most common indications for intubation were respiratory failure (53%) and loss of consciousness (13.6%). The mean duration for intubation in patients with and without underlying disorder were 11.7 and 5.2 days, respectively (P-value < 0.01). The means of time for intubation in the APC and non-APC groups were 10 and 11.9 days, respectively (P-value 0.145). A total of 23 (34.8%) patients had complications, including death, misplacement of the endotracheal tube, atelectasis, unplanned extubation, etc. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the rates of complications, except for atelectasis. Thirteen (19.7%) patients had atelectasis (2 patients in APC group (6%) and 11 patients in non-APC group (33.3%)) (P-value = 0.022). The mortality rate was the same for the both groups (P-value = 1). Conclusions: In sum, the most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure. No significant difference was observed among patients treated with the APC, and non-APC modes in terms of the complications occurred, except for atelectasis which occurred more frequently in the non-APC group. Therefore, it was concluded that there was no difference between conventional and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in terms of morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":14593,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Complications of Mechanically Ventilated Children in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Iran: Comparing Different Modes\",\"authors\":\"Touran Chegeni, M. Olfat, B. Yaghmaie, Seyed Abbas Hassani, Meisam Sharifzadeh, Z. Najafi, M. Mohammadpour\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijp-119875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is among the most common therapeutic modalities in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), which works based on a defined ventilation mode. Nowadays, conventional and alternative modes including adaptive pressure control (APC) and non-APC modes are frequently employed. Although MV can be helpful in many cases, it may cause some complications resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the demographic features and complications of mechanically ventilated children in a PICU in Iran, as well as to compare different ventilation modes. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in PICUs of children’s medical center hospital - a tertiary referral pediatric hospital. Results: Of 66 patients included in this study, 33 patients were treated with APC modes, whereas 33 patients were treated with non-APC modes. The most common indications for intubation were respiratory failure (53%) and loss of consciousness (13.6%). The mean duration for intubation in patients with and without underlying disorder were 11.7 and 5.2 days, respectively (P-value < 0.01). The means of time for intubation in the APC and non-APC groups were 10 and 11.9 days, respectively (P-value 0.145). A total of 23 (34.8%) patients had complications, including death, misplacement of the endotracheal tube, atelectasis, unplanned extubation, etc. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the rates of complications, except for atelectasis. Thirteen (19.7%) patients had atelectasis (2 patients in APC group (6%) and 11 patients in non-APC group (33.3%)) (P-value = 0.022). The mortality rate was the same for the both groups (P-value = 1). Conclusions: In sum, the most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure. No significant difference was observed among patients treated with the APC, and non-APC modes in terms of the complications occurred, except for atelectasis which occurred more frequently in the non-APC group. Therefore, it was concluded that there was no difference between conventional and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in terms of morbidity and mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-119875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-119875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械通气(MV)是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)最常见的治疗方式之一,其工作基于确定的通气模式。目前,常规和替代模式包括自适应压力控制(APC)和非APC模式经常被采用。虽然MV在许多情况下是有帮助的,但它可能引起一些并发症,导致显著的发病率和死亡率。目的:本研究旨在调查伊朗PICU中机械通气儿童的人口学特征和并发症,并比较不同的通气模式。方法:对某三级转诊儿科医院儿童医学中心医院picu进行回顾性病例对照研究。结果:本研究纳入的66例患者中,33例采用APC模式,33例采用非APC模式。最常见的插管指征是呼吸衰竭(53%)和意识丧失(13.6%)。有基础疾病和无基础疾病患者的平均插管时间分别为11.7天和5.2天(p值< 0.01)。APC组和非APC组插管时间平均分别为10和11.9 d (p值0.145)。共有23例(34.8%)患者出现并发症,包括死亡、气管插管错位、肺不张、意外拔管等。除肺不张外,两组间并发症发生率无显著差异。发生肺不张13例(19.7%),其中APC组2例(6%),非APC组11例(33.3%),p值= 0.022。两组患者的死亡率相同(p值= 1)。结论:综上所述,最常见的插管指征是呼吸衰竭。除非APC组肺不张发生率较高外,APC组与非APC组在并发症发生方面无显著差异。因此,我们得出结论,在发病率和死亡率方面,常规和替代机械通气模式没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Characteristics and Complications of Mechanically Ventilated Children in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Iran: Comparing Different Modes
Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is among the most common therapeutic modalities in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), which works based on a defined ventilation mode. Nowadays, conventional and alternative modes including adaptive pressure control (APC) and non-APC modes are frequently employed. Although MV can be helpful in many cases, it may cause some complications resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the demographic features and complications of mechanically ventilated children in a PICU in Iran, as well as to compare different ventilation modes. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in PICUs of children’s medical center hospital - a tertiary referral pediatric hospital. Results: Of 66 patients included in this study, 33 patients were treated with APC modes, whereas 33 patients were treated with non-APC modes. The most common indications for intubation were respiratory failure (53%) and loss of consciousness (13.6%). The mean duration for intubation in patients with and without underlying disorder were 11.7 and 5.2 days, respectively (P-value < 0.01). The means of time for intubation in the APC and non-APC groups were 10 and 11.9 days, respectively (P-value 0.145). A total of 23 (34.8%) patients had complications, including death, misplacement of the endotracheal tube, atelectasis, unplanned extubation, etc. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the rates of complications, except for atelectasis. Thirteen (19.7%) patients had atelectasis (2 patients in APC group (6%) and 11 patients in non-APC group (33.3%)) (P-value = 0.022). The mortality rate was the same for the both groups (P-value = 1). Conclusions: In sum, the most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure. No significant difference was observed among patients treated with the APC, and non-APC modes in terms of the complications occurred, except for atelectasis which occurred more frequently in the non-APC group. Therefore, it was concluded that there was no difference between conventional and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in terms of morbidity and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Pediatrics (Iran J Pediatr) is a peer-reviewed medical publication. The purpose of Iran J Pediatr is to increase knowledge, stimulate research in all fields of Pediatrics, and promote better management of pediatric patients. To achieve the goals, the journal publishes basic, biomedical, and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases relevant to pediatrics. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and their significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by minimum three anonymous reviewers. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as the material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信