包含劳动保护与劳动保护“背贴”,一个替代的运行方法,一个企业在工作时要注意安全与健康的注意

Q4 Medicine
A. Zimber, Julika Horchler, Imke Weiser, S. Gregersen, Martin Prüße, Britta Schmitt-Howe, Ulrike Pietrzyk
{"title":"包含劳动保护与劳动保护“背贴”,一个替代的运行方法,一个企业在工作时要注意安全与健康的注意","authors":"A. Zimber, Julika Horchler, Imke Weiser, S. Gregersen, Martin Prüße, Britta Schmitt-Howe, Ulrike Pietrzyk","doi":"10.17147/asu-1-280228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational safety “piggybacked” – an alternative concept for addressing companies on occupational health and safety. Part I: Theoretical foundation Background: Employers are obliged to implement occupational safety measures. However, implementation rates are rising only very slowly. Reservations about the issues and official requirements are widespread among entrepreneurs. Objective: There is still a great need for statutory accident insurance organisations to successfully address entrepreneurs so that they can ensure the health and safety of their workers. Method: Based on findings from cognitive and learning psychology, an alternative approach, known as the “piggyback” method, was developed. Results: By linking the health and safety topics with positively evaluated contextual stimuli, the reservations can be circumvented and a first positive change in attitude can be achieved. For a sustainable change in behaviour, a deeper dive into the issues is necessary. Conclusions: The “piggyback” method can be used especially to reach entrepreneurs who have shown little motivation for implementation so far. The concept can be applied to different fields of prevention, but still requires further testing and evaluation. Ethical aspects must also be taken into account during implementation. Keywords: occupational health and safety– information processing – entrepreneurs – targeting concept","PeriodicalId":53639,"journal":{"name":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbeitsschutz „im Huckepack“ – ein alternatives Konzept zur Ansprache von Unternehmen auf Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit\",\"authors\":\"A. Zimber, Julika Horchler, Imke Weiser, S. Gregersen, Martin Prüße, Britta Schmitt-Howe, Ulrike Pietrzyk\",\"doi\":\"10.17147/asu-1-280228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Occupational safety “piggybacked” – an alternative concept for addressing companies on occupational health and safety. Part I: Theoretical foundation Background: Employers are obliged to implement occupational safety measures. However, implementation rates are rising only very slowly. Reservations about the issues and official requirements are widespread among entrepreneurs. Objective: There is still a great need for statutory accident insurance organisations to successfully address entrepreneurs so that they can ensure the health and safety of their workers. Method: Based on findings from cognitive and learning psychology, an alternative approach, known as the “piggyback” method, was developed. Results: By linking the health and safety topics with positively evaluated contextual stimuli, the reservations can be circumvented and a first positive change in attitude can be achieved. For a sustainable change in behaviour, a deeper dive into the issues is necessary. Conclusions: The “piggyback” method can be used especially to reach entrepreneurs who have shown little motivation for implementation so far. The concept can be applied to different fields of prevention, but still requires further testing and evaluation. Ethical aspects must also be taken into account during implementation. Keywords: occupational health and safety– information processing – entrepreneurs – targeting concept\",\"PeriodicalId\":53639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-280228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-280228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"背驮式"职业安全——向公司提出职业健康和安全问题的另一种概念。第一部分:理论基础背景:雇主有义务实施职业安全措施。然而,执行率的上升非常缓慢。企业家对这些问题和官方要求普遍持保留态度。目标:仍然非常需要法定意外保险组织成功地解决企业家的问题,以便他们能够确保其工人的健康和安全。方法:基于认知和学习心理学的发现,一种被称为“背驮式”方法的替代方法被开发出来。结果:通过将健康和安全主题与积极评价的情境刺激联系起来,可以绕过保留并实现态度的第一次积极变化。为了可持续地改变行为,有必要深入研究这些问题。结论:“背驮式”方法尤其适用于迄今为止没有表现出实施动机的企业家。这一概念可应用于不同的预防领域,但仍需进一步试验和评价。在执行过程中也必须考虑到道德方面的问题。关键词:职业健康安全;信息处理;企业家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbeitsschutz „im Huckepack“ – ein alternatives Konzept zur Ansprache von Unternehmen auf Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit
Occupational safety “piggybacked” – an alternative concept for addressing companies on occupational health and safety. Part I: Theoretical foundation Background: Employers are obliged to implement occupational safety measures. However, implementation rates are rising only very slowly. Reservations about the issues and official requirements are widespread among entrepreneurs. Objective: There is still a great need for statutory accident insurance organisations to successfully address entrepreneurs so that they can ensure the health and safety of their workers. Method: Based on findings from cognitive and learning psychology, an alternative approach, known as the “piggyback” method, was developed. Results: By linking the health and safety topics with positively evaluated contextual stimuli, the reservations can be circumvented and a first positive change in attitude can be achieved. For a sustainable change in behaviour, a deeper dive into the issues is necessary. Conclusions: The “piggyback” method can be used especially to reach entrepreneurs who have shown little motivation for implementation so far. The concept can be applied to different fields of prevention, but still requires further testing and evaluation. Ethical aspects must also be taken into account during implementation. Keywords: occupational health and safety– information processing – entrepreneurs – targeting concept
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信