心血管疾病临床预测模型中的性别实地概要。

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Jessica K Paulus, Benjamin S Wessler, Christine Lundquist, Lana L Y Lai, Gowri Raman, Jennifer S Lutz, David M Kent
{"title":"心血管疾病临床预测模型中的性别实地概要。","authors":"Jessica K Paulus, Benjamin S Wessler, Christine Lundquist, Lana L Y Lai, Gowri Raman, Jennifer S Lutz, David M Kent","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several widely used risk scores for cardiovascular disease (CVD) incorporate sex effects, yet there has been no systematic summary of the role of sex in clinical prediction models (CPMs). To better understand the potential of these models to support sex-specific care, we conducted a field synopsis of sex effects in CPMs for CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We identified CPMs in the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness CPM Registry, a comprehensive database of CVD CPMs published from January 1990 to May 2012. We report the proportion of models including sex effects on CVD incidence or prognosis, summarize the directionality of the predictive effects of sex, and explore factors influencing the inclusion of sex. Of 592 CVD-related CPMs, 193 (33%) included sex as a predictor or presented sex-stratified models. Sex effects were included in 78% (53/68) of models predicting incidence of CVD in a general population, versus only 35% (59/171), 21% (12/58), and 17% (12/72) of models predicting outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure, respectively. Among sex-including CPMs, women with heart failure were at lower mortality risk in 8 of 8 models; women undergoing revascularization for coronary artery disease were at higher mortality risk in 10 of 12 models. Factors associated with the inclusion of sex effects included the number of outcome events and using cohorts at-risk for CVD (rather than with established CVD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although CPMs hold promise for supporting sex-specific decision making in CVD clinical care, sex effects are included in only one third of published CPMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51900,"journal":{"name":"MUSICAL TIMES","volume":"78 1","pages":"S8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Synopsis of Sex in Clinical Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica K Paulus, Benjamin S Wessler, Christine Lundquist, Lana L Y Lai, Gowri Raman, Jennifer S Lutz, David M Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several widely used risk scores for cardiovascular disease (CVD) incorporate sex effects, yet there has been no systematic summary of the role of sex in clinical prediction models (CPMs). To better understand the potential of these models to support sex-specific care, we conducted a field synopsis of sex effects in CPMs for CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We identified CPMs in the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness CPM Registry, a comprehensive database of CVD CPMs published from January 1990 to May 2012. We report the proportion of models including sex effects on CVD incidence or prognosis, summarize the directionality of the predictive effects of sex, and explore factors influencing the inclusion of sex. Of 592 CVD-related CPMs, 193 (33%) included sex as a predictor or presented sex-stratified models. Sex effects were included in 78% (53/68) of models predicting incidence of CVD in a general population, versus only 35% (59/171), 21% (12/58), and 17% (12/72) of models predicting outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure, respectively. Among sex-including CPMs, women with heart failure were at lower mortality risk in 8 of 8 models; women undergoing revascularization for coronary artery disease were at higher mortality risk in 10 of 12 models. Factors associated with the inclusion of sex effects included the number of outcome events and using cohorts at-risk for CVD (rather than with established CVD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although CPMs hold promise for supporting sex-specific decision making in CVD clinical care, sex effects are included in only one third of published CPMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSICAL TIMES\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"S8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSICAL TIMES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSICAL TIMES","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几种广泛使用的心血管疾病(CVD)风险评分都包含性别效应,但临床预测模型(CPM)中的性别作用还没有系统的总结。为了更好地了解这些模型在支持性别特异性护理方面的潜力,我们对心血管疾病临床预测模型中的性别效应进行了实地综述:我们在塔夫茨预测分析和比较效应 CPM 注册表中识别了 CPM,这是一个从 1990 年 1 月至 2012 年 5 月发布的心血管疾病 CPM 综合数据库。我们报告了包含对心血管疾病发病率或预后的性别效应的模型比例,总结了性别预测效应的方向性,并探讨了影响纳入性别的因素。在 592 项心血管疾病相关的 CPM 中,有 193 项(33%)将性别作为预测因子或提出了性别分层模型。在预测普通人群心血管疾病发病率的模型中,78%(53/68)的模型包含了性别效应,而在预测冠心病、中风和心力衰竭患者预后的模型中,分别只有 35%(59/171)、21%(12/58)和 17%(12/72)的模型包含了性别效应。在包含性别影响的 CPM 中,患有心力衰竭的女性在 8 个模型中的 8 个模型中死亡率风险较低;因冠状动脉疾病接受血管重建的女性在 12 个模型中的 10 个模型中死亡率风险较高。纳入性别效应的相关因素包括结果事件的数量和使用心血管疾病高危人群(而非已确诊的心血管疾病患者):结论:尽管CPM有望支持心血管疾病临床治疗中的性别决策,但已发表的CPM中仅有三分之一纳入了性别效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field Synopsis of Sex in Clinical Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Disease.

Background: Several widely used risk scores for cardiovascular disease (CVD) incorporate sex effects, yet there has been no systematic summary of the role of sex in clinical prediction models (CPMs). To better understand the potential of these models to support sex-specific care, we conducted a field synopsis of sex effects in CPMs for CVD.

Methods and results: We identified CPMs in the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness CPM Registry, a comprehensive database of CVD CPMs published from January 1990 to May 2012. We report the proportion of models including sex effects on CVD incidence or prognosis, summarize the directionality of the predictive effects of sex, and explore factors influencing the inclusion of sex. Of 592 CVD-related CPMs, 193 (33%) included sex as a predictor or presented sex-stratified models. Sex effects were included in 78% (53/68) of models predicting incidence of CVD in a general population, versus only 35% (59/171), 21% (12/58), and 17% (12/72) of models predicting outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure, respectively. Among sex-including CPMs, women with heart failure were at lower mortality risk in 8 of 8 models; women undergoing revascularization for coronary artery disease were at higher mortality risk in 10 of 12 models. Factors associated with the inclusion of sex effects included the number of outcome events and using cohorts at-risk for CVD (rather than with established CVD).

Conclusions: Although CPMs hold promise for supporting sex-specific decision making in CVD clinical care, sex effects are included in only one third of published CPMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MUSICAL TIMES
MUSICAL TIMES MUSIC-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信