普瑞巴林治疗中枢性腹痛综合征的随机临床试验。

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Ri Xu, Yanyan Wang, Wei Han
{"title":"普瑞巴林治疗中枢性腹痛综合征的随机临床试验。","authors":"Ri Xu,&nbsp;Yanyan Wang,&nbsp;Wei Han","doi":"10.1177/17562848231152334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregabalin is worldwidely licensed for the treatment of a variety of pain syndromes and supposed to be a potential candidate for the centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome (CAPS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of pregabalin on nociceptive and emotional symptoms in CAPS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an open-label randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CAPS patients were randomized to receive pregabalin 75 mg (P group), pinaverium bromide 50 mg (PB group), or pregabalin combined pinaverium bromide regimen (P + PB group) three times daily for 4 weeks. Questionnaires were completed biweekly. The primary outcomes were defined as the average abdominal pain scores of severity and frequency at weeks 2 and 4. Secondary outcomes included the reduction in abdominal pain scores, Somatic Self-rating Scale (SSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7) scales obtained at the end of trial to the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 102 eligible patients were recruited and randomized. The mean severity scores of abdominal pain were 1.39 ± 1.28, 0.97 ± 1.43 <i>versus</i> 2.91 ± 1.44 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group <i>versus</i> PB group at week 2 and were 0.90 ± 1.21, 1.28 ± 1.87 <i>versus</i> 2.74 ± 1.75 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) at week 4. The mean frequency scores were 2.55 ± 2.55, 2.03 ± 2.80 <i>versus</i> 5.12 ± 2.09(<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group <i>versus</i> PB group at week 2 and were 1.72 ± 2.46, 2.00 ± 2.90 <i>versus</i> 4.55 ± 2.55 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) at week 4. When comparing the changes in SSS, PHQ-15, and GAD-7 scores, patients accepting pregabalin or pregabalin combination regimen reported a more decrease than pinaverium bromide recipients (<i>p</i> = 0.0002, <i>p</i> = 0.0002, and <i>p</i> = 0.0033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial suggests that pregabalin may be beneficial for CAPS abdominal pain and concomitant somatic or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028026).</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231152334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/e1/10.1177_17562848231152334.PMC9989377.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized clinical trial: the effects of pregabalin for centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Ri Xu,&nbsp;Yanyan Wang,&nbsp;Wei Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848231152334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregabalin is worldwidely licensed for the treatment of a variety of pain syndromes and supposed to be a potential candidate for the centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome (CAPS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of pregabalin on nociceptive and emotional symptoms in CAPS patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an open-label randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CAPS patients were randomized to receive pregabalin 75 mg (P group), pinaverium bromide 50 mg (PB group), or pregabalin combined pinaverium bromide regimen (P + PB group) three times daily for 4 weeks. Questionnaires were completed biweekly. The primary outcomes were defined as the average abdominal pain scores of severity and frequency at weeks 2 and 4. Secondary outcomes included the reduction in abdominal pain scores, Somatic Self-rating Scale (SSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7) scales obtained at the end of trial to the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 102 eligible patients were recruited and randomized. The mean severity scores of abdominal pain were 1.39 ± 1.28, 0.97 ± 1.43 <i>versus</i> 2.91 ± 1.44 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group <i>versus</i> PB group at week 2 and were 0.90 ± 1.21, 1.28 ± 1.87 <i>versus</i> 2.74 ± 1.75 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) at week 4. The mean frequency scores were 2.55 ± 2.55, 2.03 ± 2.80 <i>versus</i> 5.12 ± 2.09(<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group <i>versus</i> PB group at week 2 and were 1.72 ± 2.46, 2.00 ± 2.90 <i>versus</i> 4.55 ± 2.55 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) at week 4. When comparing the changes in SSS, PHQ-15, and GAD-7 scores, patients accepting pregabalin or pregabalin combination regimen reported a more decrease than pinaverium bromide recipients (<i>p</i> = 0.0002, <i>p</i> = 0.0002, and <i>p</i> = 0.0033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial suggests that pregabalin may be beneficial for CAPS abdominal pain and concomitant somatic or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028026).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17562848231152334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/e1/10.1177_17562848231152334.PMC9989377.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231152334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231152334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:普瑞巴林在世界范围内被许可用于治疗多种疼痛综合征,并被认为是中央介导性腹痛综合征(CAPS)的潜在候选药物。目的:探讨普瑞巴林对CAPS患者伤害性和情绪性症状的治疗效果。设计:这是一项开放标签随机对照试验。方法:CAPS患者随机接受普瑞巴林75 mg (P组)、溴化哌维铵50 mg (PB组)或普瑞巴林联合溴化哌维铵方案(P + PB组),每日3次,连续4周。调查问卷每两周完成一次。主要结局定义为第2周和第4周的平均腹痛严重程度和频率评分。次要结果包括在试验结束时腹痛评分、躯体自评量表(SSS)、患者健康问卷-15 (PHQ-15)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表7 (GAD-7)量表降至基线。结果:共纳入102例符合条件的患者。腹痛严重程度平均评分分别为1.39±1.28、0.97±1.43和2.91±1.44 (p与PB组比较,第2周分别为0.90±1.21、1.28±1.87和2.74±1.75 (p与PB组比较,第2周分别为1.72±2.46、2.00±2.90和4.55±2.55 (p = 0.0002、p = 0.0002和p = 0.0033)。结论:本试验提示普瑞巴林可能对CAPS腹痛及伴随的躯体或焦虑症状有益。报名:www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028026)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Randomized clinical trial: the effects of pregabalin for centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome.

Randomized clinical trial: the effects of pregabalin for centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome.

Randomized clinical trial: the effects of pregabalin for centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome.

Randomized clinical trial: the effects of pregabalin for centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome.

Background: Pregabalin is worldwidely licensed for the treatment of a variety of pain syndromes and supposed to be a potential candidate for the centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome (CAPS).

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of pregabalin on nociceptive and emotional symptoms in CAPS patients.

Design: This is an open-label randomized controlled trial.

Methods: CAPS patients were randomized to receive pregabalin 75 mg (P group), pinaverium bromide 50 mg (PB group), or pregabalin combined pinaverium bromide regimen (P + PB group) three times daily for 4 weeks. Questionnaires were completed biweekly. The primary outcomes were defined as the average abdominal pain scores of severity and frequency at weeks 2 and 4. Secondary outcomes included the reduction in abdominal pain scores, Somatic Self-rating Scale (SSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7) scales obtained at the end of trial to the baseline.

Results: Totally, 102 eligible patients were recruited and randomized. The mean severity scores of abdominal pain were 1.39 ± 1.28, 0.97 ± 1.43 versus 2.91 ± 1.44 (p < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group versus PB group at week 2 and were 0.90 ± 1.21, 1.28 ± 1.87 versus 2.74 ± 1.75 (p < 0.0001) at week 4. The mean frequency scores were 2.55 ± 2.55, 2.03 ± 2.80 versus 5.12 ± 2.09(p < 0.0001) in P or PB + P group versus PB group at week 2 and were 1.72 ± 2.46, 2.00 ± 2.90 versus 4.55 ± 2.55 (p < 0.0001) at week 4. When comparing the changes in SSS, PHQ-15, and GAD-7 scores, patients accepting pregabalin or pregabalin combination regimen reported a more decrease than pinaverium bromide recipients (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0002, and p = 0.0033).

Conclusion: This trial suggests that pregabalin may be beneficial for CAPS abdominal pain and concomitant somatic or anxiety symptoms.

Registration: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028026).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信