大豆苗期施用与草甘膦相关杀草剂的选择性

J. Coradin, Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz, Sergio De Oliveira Procópio, Alessandro Guerra da Silva, Guilherme Sales Vian, Paulo Victor Leão Lima Chavaglia, Marco Antônio Rodrigues Goulart, Matheus de Freitas Souza
{"title":"大豆苗期施用与草甘膦相关杀草剂的选择性","authors":"J. Coradin, Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz, Sergio De Oliveira Procópio, Alessandro Guerra da Silva, Guilherme Sales Vian, Paulo Victor Leão Lima Chavaglia, Marco Antônio Rodrigues Goulart, Matheus de Freitas Souza","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield capacity and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors, such as drought, diseases, and pests. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, tests designed to assess the tolerance of these new soybean cultivars to herbicides are needed to avoid yield losses caused by poisoning after application. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides associations applied in post-emergence of three soybean cultivars. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were: glyphosate (960), glyphosate + bentazon (960 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (960 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (960 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (960 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (960 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (960 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The components of growth and yield evaluated were: height, stand, the weight of one hundred grains, and yield. A visual note of intoxication was also made for each treatment. The application of post-emergence herbicides does not alter the plant stand of soybean cultivars. Also, these herbicides were not reduced the yield of M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Both glyphosate isolated and mixed with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced yield of Bônus IPRO® cultivar.\nHighlights\n\nHerbicide associations applied post-emergence cause higher levels of injuries on soybean crop.\nThe visualization of injuries resulting from herbicides on soybean does not necessarily imply yield reductions.\nThe genetics of the soybean cultivar is decisive for the response in terms of sensitivity to herbicides.\n","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selectivity of latifolicides associated with glyphosate applied in post-emergence on soybean cultivars\",\"authors\":\"J. Coradin, Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz, Sergio De Oliveira Procópio, Alessandro Guerra da Silva, Guilherme Sales Vian, Paulo Victor Leão Lima Chavaglia, Marco Antônio Rodrigues Goulart, Matheus de Freitas Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.48162/rev.39.098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield capacity and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors, such as drought, diseases, and pests. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, tests designed to assess the tolerance of these new soybean cultivars to herbicides are needed to avoid yield losses caused by poisoning after application. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides associations applied in post-emergence of three soybean cultivars. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were: glyphosate (960), glyphosate + bentazon (960 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (960 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (960 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (960 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (960 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (960 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The components of growth and yield evaluated were: height, stand, the weight of one hundred grains, and yield. A visual note of intoxication was also made for each treatment. The application of post-emergence herbicides does not alter the plant stand of soybean cultivars. Also, these herbicides were not reduced the yield of M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Both glyphosate isolated and mixed with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced yield of Bônus IPRO® cultivar.\\nHighlights\\n\\nHerbicide associations applied post-emergence cause higher levels of injuries on soybean crop.\\nThe visualization of injuries resulting from herbicides on soybean does not necessarily imply yield reductions.\\nThe genetics of the soybean cultivar is decisive for the response in terms of sensitivity to herbicides.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,大豆品种的遗传改良主要集中在提高产量和抗旱、抗病虫害等非生物和生物因素的耐受性上。然而,在转移目标基因的过程中,一些对除草剂耐受性较低的基因可以被整合到新品种的基因组中。因此,需要设计试验来评估这些大豆新品种对除草剂的耐受性,以避免施用后中毒造成的产量损失。本研究的目的是评价三种大豆品种出苗后施用除草剂的选择性。实验设计为随机完全区组,有4个重复。选择的品种为M7110 IPRO®、Foco IPRO®和Bônus IPRO®。使用的除草剂和剂量分别为:草甘膦(960)、草甘膦+苯达松(960 + 600)、草甘膦+美沙芬(960 + 175)、草甘膦+乳醚(960 + 120)、草甘膦+吡嗪(960 + 100)、草甘膦+氯脲(960 + 10)、草甘膦+氯兰舒仑(960 + 39.5)和不施用除草剂的对照。生长和产量的评价成分为:株高、林分、百粒重和产量。每次治疗都有中毒的视觉记录。苗期除草剂的施用不会改变大豆品种的生长状况。此外,这些除草剂对M7110 IPRO®和Foco IPRO®品种的产量也没有降低。分离草甘膦并与乳芬或吡嗪混合可降低Bônus IPRO®品种的产量。苗期后施用杀菌剂会对大豆作物造成更高程度的伤害。可视化除草剂对大豆造成的伤害并不一定意味着产量减少。大豆品种的遗传对除草剂的敏感性起决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selectivity of latifolicides associated with glyphosate applied in post-emergence on soybean cultivars
The genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield capacity and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors, such as drought, diseases, and pests. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, tests designed to assess the tolerance of these new soybean cultivars to herbicides are needed to avoid yield losses caused by poisoning after application. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides associations applied in post-emergence of three soybean cultivars. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were: glyphosate (960), glyphosate + bentazon (960 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (960 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (960 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (960 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (960 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (960 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The components of growth and yield evaluated were: height, stand, the weight of one hundred grains, and yield. A visual note of intoxication was also made for each treatment. The application of post-emergence herbicides does not alter the plant stand of soybean cultivars. Also, these herbicides were not reduced the yield of M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Both glyphosate isolated and mixed with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced yield of Bônus IPRO® cultivar. Highlights Herbicide associations applied post-emergence cause higher levels of injuries on soybean crop. The visualization of injuries resulting from herbicides on soybean does not necessarily imply yield reductions. The genetics of the soybean cultivar is decisive for the response in terms of sensitivity to herbicides.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信