利用脑电图和神经生理生物标志物工具箱(NBT)结合机器学习识别神经精神疾病

F. Alshamsi, T. Lewis
{"title":"利用脑电图和神经生理生物标志物工具箱(NBT)结合机器学习识别神经精神疾病","authors":"F. Alshamsi, T. Lewis","doi":"10.9790/0661-2205023239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromyogram (EMG) contamination has been shown to affect electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Therefore, methods of isolating and removing EMG contamination are a focus of research. One of the most common ways to eliminate this contamination is through independent component analysis (ICA). Also, surface Laplacian (SL) has been proven to isolate the distant sources of EEG signals. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the effects of EMG contamination on EEG signals using the Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT) and the impact of applying ICA, and ICA + SL on raw data. In this paper, the method for preparing the data is ICA with an auto-pruned method and SL using a flexible spherical spline. Machine learning was used to classify three neuropsychiatric diseases (anxiety, depression, and epilepsy) against control subjects under the three types of data pre-processing and raw data + SL. The data has been split into one second segments and classified according to features extracted from the NBT, which are the amplitude and the normalised amplitude for all frequency bands. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for reducing the features, and 10-fold cross-validation and artificial neural networking were the methods that has been used for the classification. The results show a high percentage of accuracy in ICA + SL in all frequency bands. However, ICA in general has a percentage quite similar to the raw data, while SL, as well as ICA with a small percentage improved more than ICA and raw data. Overall, the gamma band for both amplitude and normalised amplitude in ICA + SL showed the best results, with accuracy over 87%, when comparing it with all disease classifications. Both results indicate that ICA + SL eliminate and isolate EMG contamination. However, the classification of ICA shows no significant change in the percentage of accuracy. Key Word: Electromyogram(EMG); electroencephalogram (EEG); Laplacian (SL); Machine learning; frequency bands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Submission: 30-09-2020 Date of Acceptance: 13-10-2020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------","PeriodicalId":91890,"journal":{"name":"IOSR journal of computer engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination of neuropsychiatric disease using EEG and Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT) with Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"F. Alshamsi, T. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.9790/0661-2205023239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromyogram (EMG) contamination has been shown to affect electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Therefore, methods of isolating and removing EMG contamination are a focus of research. One of the most common ways to eliminate this contamination is through independent component analysis (ICA). Also, surface Laplacian (SL) has been proven to isolate the distant sources of EEG signals. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the effects of EMG contamination on EEG signals using the Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT) and the impact of applying ICA, and ICA + SL on raw data. In this paper, the method for preparing the data is ICA with an auto-pruned method and SL using a flexible spherical spline. Machine learning was used to classify three neuropsychiatric diseases (anxiety, depression, and epilepsy) against control subjects under the three types of data pre-processing and raw data + SL. The data has been split into one second segments and classified according to features extracted from the NBT, which are the amplitude and the normalised amplitude for all frequency bands. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for reducing the features, and 10-fold cross-validation and artificial neural networking were the methods that has been used for the classification. The results show a high percentage of accuracy in ICA + SL in all frequency bands. However, ICA in general has a percentage quite similar to the raw data, while SL, as well as ICA with a small percentage improved more than ICA and raw data. Overall, the gamma band for both amplitude and normalised amplitude in ICA + SL showed the best results, with accuracy over 87%, when comparing it with all disease classifications. Both results indicate that ICA + SL eliminate and isolate EMG contamination. However, the classification of ICA shows no significant change in the percentage of accuracy. Key Word: Electromyogram(EMG); electroencephalogram (EEG); Laplacian (SL); Machine learning; frequency bands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Submission: 30-09-2020 Date of Acceptance: 13-10-2020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\",\"PeriodicalId\":91890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IOSR journal of computer engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IOSR journal of computer engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9790/0661-2205023239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR journal of computer engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/0661-2205023239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌电图(EMG)污染已被证明会影响脑电图(EEG)信号。因此,分离和去除肌电图污染的方法是研究的热点。消除这种污染最常见的方法之一是通过独立成分分析(ICA)。此外,表面拉普拉斯(SL)已被证明可以隔离脑电图信号的远源。本文的目的是利用神经生理生物标志物工具箱(NBT)展示肌电图污染对脑电图信号的影响,以及应用ICA和ICA + SL对原始数据的影响。在本文中,数据的准备方法是使用自动修剪方法的ICA和使用柔性球面样条的SL。在三种类型的数据预处理和原始数据+ SL下,使用机器学习对对照对象进行三种神经精神疾病(焦虑、抑郁和癫痫)的分类。数据被分割成一秒段,并根据从NBT中提取的特征进行分类,即所有频段的振幅和归一化振幅。采用主成分分析(PCA)对特征进行约简,并采用10倍交叉验证和人工神经网络进行分类。结果表明,ICA + SL在所有频段都有很高的准确率。但是,ICA总体上具有与原始数据相当相似的百分比,而SL以及具有小百分比的ICA比ICA和原始数据改进得更多。总的来说,与所有疾病分类相比,ICA + SL的振幅和归一化振幅的伽玛波段显示出最好的结果,准确率超过87%。这两个结果表明,ICA + SL消除和分离了肌电图污染。然而,ICA的分类在准确率百分比上没有显着变化。关键词:肌电图;脑电图(EEG);拉普拉斯算子(SL);机器学习;频带。------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 提交日期:30-09-2020验收日期:13-10-2020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrimination of neuropsychiatric disease using EEG and Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT) with Machine Learning
Electromyogram (EMG) contamination has been shown to affect electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Therefore, methods of isolating and removing EMG contamination are a focus of research. One of the most common ways to eliminate this contamination is through independent component analysis (ICA). Also, surface Laplacian (SL) has been proven to isolate the distant sources of EEG signals. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the effects of EMG contamination on EEG signals using the Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT) and the impact of applying ICA, and ICA + SL on raw data. In this paper, the method for preparing the data is ICA with an auto-pruned method and SL using a flexible spherical spline. Machine learning was used to classify three neuropsychiatric diseases (anxiety, depression, and epilepsy) against control subjects under the three types of data pre-processing and raw data + SL. The data has been split into one second segments and classified according to features extracted from the NBT, which are the amplitude and the normalised amplitude for all frequency bands. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for reducing the features, and 10-fold cross-validation and artificial neural networking were the methods that has been used for the classification. The results show a high percentage of accuracy in ICA + SL in all frequency bands. However, ICA in general has a percentage quite similar to the raw data, while SL, as well as ICA with a small percentage improved more than ICA and raw data. Overall, the gamma band for both amplitude and normalised amplitude in ICA + SL showed the best results, with accuracy over 87%, when comparing it with all disease classifications. Both results indicate that ICA + SL eliminate and isolate EMG contamination. However, the classification of ICA shows no significant change in the percentage of accuracy. Key Word: Electromyogram(EMG); electroencephalogram (EEG); Laplacian (SL); Machine learning; frequency bands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Submission: 30-09-2020 Date of Acceptance: 13-10-2020 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信