担保义务(抵押)的执行:现状、问题和克服方法

T. Konovalova, E. Koval
{"title":"担保义务(抵押)的执行:现状、问题和克服方法","authors":"T. Konovalova, E. Koval","doi":"10.31618/esu.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the problem of foreclosure on property that is the subject of a mortgage. A brief review of the historical development of the mortgage institute is carried out, the features of the mortgage subject are highlighted, various approaches to determining the legal nature of the mortgage are considered. On the basis of these theoretical provisions, the problems of law enforcement are considered. The acts of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, which contain explanations on the possibility of foreclosure on the only housing that is the subject of a mortgage, are analyzed. Examples of decisions of arbitration courts following explanations given by higher courts are given. The conclusion is made about the need for legislative consolidation of the conditions and criteria for foreclosure on the only housing in order to improve legislative regulation in the studied area.","PeriodicalId":11879,"journal":{"name":"EurasianUnionScientists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENFORCEMENT OF COLLATERAL OBLIGATIONS (MORTGAGE): CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO OVERCOME THEM\",\"authors\":\"T. Konovalova, E. Koval\",\"doi\":\"10.31618/esu.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to the problem of foreclosure on property that is the subject of a mortgage. A brief review of the historical development of the mortgage institute is carried out, the features of the mortgage subject are highlighted, various approaches to determining the legal nature of the mortgage are considered. On the basis of these theoretical provisions, the problems of law enforcement are considered. The acts of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, which contain explanations on the possibility of foreclosure on the only housing that is the subject of a mortgage, are analyzed. Examples of decisions of arbitration courts following explanations given by higher courts are given. The conclusion is made about the need for legislative consolidation of the conditions and criteria for foreclosure on the only housing in order to improve legislative regulation in the studied area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EurasianUnionScientists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EurasianUnionScientists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31618/esu.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EurasianUnionScientists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31618/esu.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是专门讨论的问题,丧失抵押品赎回权的财产,是抵押贷款的主题。简要回顾了抵押机构的历史发展,突出了抵押主体的特点,考虑了确定抵押法律性质的各种方法。在这些理论规定的基础上,对执法问题进行了思考。本文分析了大法院和宪法法院的判例,这些判例中包含了对作为担保对象的唯一住宅的止赎可能性的解释。给出了仲裁法院在上级法院作出解释后作出裁决的例子。为了完善研究地区的立法规制,有必要在立法上巩固对独栋住房止赎的条件和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ENFORCEMENT OF COLLATERAL OBLIGATIONS (MORTGAGE): CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO OVERCOME THEM
This article is devoted to the problem of foreclosure on property that is the subject of a mortgage. A brief review of the historical development of the mortgage institute is carried out, the features of the mortgage subject are highlighted, various approaches to determining the legal nature of the mortgage are considered. On the basis of these theoretical provisions, the problems of law enforcement are considered. The acts of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, which contain explanations on the possibility of foreclosure on the only housing that is the subject of a mortgage, are analyzed. Examples of decisions of arbitration courts following explanations given by higher courts are given. The conclusion is made about the need for legislative consolidation of the conditions and criteria for foreclosure on the only housing in order to improve legislative regulation in the studied area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信