给妇女她们想要的:加纳城市的避孕中止和方法偏好。

Sarah D Compton, Adom Manu, Ernest Maya, Emmanuel S K Morhe, Vanessa K Dalton
{"title":"给妇女她们想要的:加纳城市的避孕中止和方法偏好。","authors":"Sarah D Compton,&nbsp;Adom Manu,&nbsp;Ernest Maya,&nbsp;Emmanuel S K Morhe,&nbsp;Vanessa K Dalton","doi":"10.1186/s40834-022-00200-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unmet need for contraception remains high in Ghana. Reducing the number of women who discontinue their contraceptive use is one way to decrease the number of women with an unmet need. In this study, we investigated factors associated with discontinuation among a cohort of Ghanaian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who were beginning a new method of contraception at one of six urban clinics in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana were invited to participate in our study. Participants were interviewed before and after their counseling session, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-enrollment to determine continuation. During follow-up, participants who were no longer using their method were asked why, if they were using any method of contraception, and if so, which method. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with discontinuation for reason other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 472 women who reported leaving their counseling session with a method, 440 (93.2%) had at least one follow-up contact. Of the 440 women, 110 (25%) discontinued their method at some point over the 12-month period, and 94 (85.5%) did so for reasons other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy. In the multivariate regression analysis, women who reported they were given their method of choice were 12.0% less likely to discontinue due to a non-pregnancy reason (p=0.005); those who used a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method were 11.1% less likely (p=.001); and those who reported they would choose to use that method again, one measure of satisfaction, were 23.4% less likely (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore method preference and its relation to continuation. Women in our study who reported they were given the contraceptive method of their choice were less likely to discontinue using that method for non-pregnancy-related reasons. Further, those who adopted a LARC method and those who reported they would make the same method choice again were less likely to discontinue. Women should be supported in selecting a contraceptive method of their choice. Providers should work with their clients to find a method which meets their preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Give women what they want: contraceptive discontinuation and method preference in urban Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah D Compton,&nbsp;Adom Manu,&nbsp;Ernest Maya,&nbsp;Emmanuel S K Morhe,&nbsp;Vanessa K Dalton\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-022-00200-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unmet need for contraception remains high in Ghana. Reducing the number of women who discontinue their contraceptive use is one way to decrease the number of women with an unmet need. In this study, we investigated factors associated with discontinuation among a cohort of Ghanaian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who were beginning a new method of contraception at one of six urban clinics in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana were invited to participate in our study. Participants were interviewed before and after their counseling session, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-enrollment to determine continuation. During follow-up, participants who were no longer using their method were asked why, if they were using any method of contraception, and if so, which method. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with discontinuation for reason other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 472 women who reported leaving their counseling session with a method, 440 (93.2%) had at least one follow-up contact. Of the 440 women, 110 (25%) discontinued their method at some point over the 12-month period, and 94 (85.5%) did so for reasons other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy. In the multivariate regression analysis, women who reported they were given their method of choice were 12.0% less likely to discontinue due to a non-pregnancy reason (p=0.005); those who used a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method were 11.1% less likely (p=.001); and those who reported they would choose to use that method again, one measure of satisfaction, were 23.4% less likely (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore method preference and its relation to continuation. Women in our study who reported they were given the contraceptive method of their choice were less likely to discontinue using that method for non-pregnancy-related reasons. Further, those who adopted a LARC method and those who reported they would make the same method choice again were less likely to discontinue. Women should be supported in selecting a contraceptive method of their choice. Providers should work with their clients to find a method which meets their preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00200-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00200-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在加纳,未满足的避孕需求仍然很高。减少停止使用避孕药具的妇女人数是减少未满足需求的妇女人数的一种方法。在这项研究中,我们调查了加纳妇女队列中与停药相关的因素。方法:邀请在加纳阿克拉和库马西的六个城市诊所之一开始使用新避孕方法的妇女参加我们的研究。在咨询之前和之后,以及在入组后3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月对参与者进行访谈,以确定是否继续。在随访期间,不再使用避孕方法的参与者被问及为什么,如果他们使用任何避孕方法,如果是,是哪种方法。进行Logistic回归分析以确定因妊娠或期望妊娠以外的原因而停药的相关因素。结果:在472名报告以某种方法结束咨询会议的女性中,440名(93.2%)至少有一次随访联系。在440名妇女中,110名(25%)在12个月期间的某个时候停止了避孕方法,94名(85.5%)因怀孕或期望怀孕以外的原因停止了避孕。在多变量回归分析中,报告自己选择了治疗方法的妇女因非妊娠原因停止治疗的可能性降低了12.0% (p=0.005);使用长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法的患者发生妊娠的可能性降低11.1% (p=.001);而那些报告他们会再次选择使用该方法的人(满意度的一种衡量标准)的可能性降低了23.4%(结论:据我们所知,目前的研究是第一个探索方法偏好及其与延续的关系的研究。在我们的研究中,报告自己选择避孕方法的妇女不太可能因为与怀孕无关的原因而停止使用该方法。此外,那些采用LARC方法的人和那些报告说他们会再次选择同样方法的人不太可能停止使用。应支持妇女选择自己选择的避孕方法。提供者应该与他们的客户合作,找到一种符合他们偏好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Give women what they want: contraceptive discontinuation and method preference in urban Ghana.

Background: Unmet need for contraception remains high in Ghana. Reducing the number of women who discontinue their contraceptive use is one way to decrease the number of women with an unmet need. In this study, we investigated factors associated with discontinuation among a cohort of Ghanaian women.

Methods: Women who were beginning a new method of contraception at one of six urban clinics in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana were invited to participate in our study. Participants were interviewed before and after their counseling session, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-enrollment to determine continuation. During follow-up, participants who were no longer using their method were asked why, if they were using any method of contraception, and if so, which method. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with discontinuation for reason other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy.

Results: Of the 472 women who reported leaving their counseling session with a method, 440 (93.2%) had at least one follow-up contact. Of the 440 women, 110 (25%) discontinued their method at some point over the 12-month period, and 94 (85.5%) did so for reasons other than pregnancy or desired pregnancy. In the multivariate regression analysis, women who reported they were given their method of choice were 12.0% less likely to discontinue due to a non-pregnancy reason (p=0.005); those who used a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method were 11.1% less likely (p=.001); and those who reported they would choose to use that method again, one measure of satisfaction, were 23.4% less likely (p<.001).

Conclusions: To our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore method preference and its relation to continuation. Women in our study who reported they were given the contraceptive method of their choice were less likely to discontinue using that method for non-pregnancy-related reasons. Further, those who adopted a LARC method and those who reported they would make the same method choice again were less likely to discontinue. Women should be supported in selecting a contraceptive method of their choice. Providers should work with their clients to find a method which meets their preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信