两种不同的直接采样离子阱质谱法监测空气中卤碳化合物的评价

Peter T. Palmer, Carla Remigi, Dane Karr
{"title":"两种不同的直接采样离子阱质谱法监测空气中卤碳化合物的评价","authors":"Peter T. Palmer,&nbsp;Carla Remigi,&nbsp;Dane Karr","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(2000)4:1<14::AID-FACT3>3.0.CO;2-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two different direct-sampling ion-trap mass spectrometry (DSITMS) methods are evaluated for monitoring trace levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air. The first is based on the use of a sample introduction system that mixes the air sample into a helium stream prior to introduction into the ion trap through an open-split interface. The second utilizes a valve and uses zero air to flush the contents of the sample loop into the ion trap. Unique features of this system are its use of air in place of helium as a buffer gas for the ion trap, and the optimization of experimental parameters to maintain sensitivity and unit mass resolution. Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC12) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl<sub>4</sub>) were employed as test compounds for this study. Figures of merit for both sample introduction methods were comparable. Detection limits were approximately 50 parts per billion by volume in MS, selected ion monitoring (SIM), and MS/MS modes. Analysis speeds were on the order of 20 s or less per sample. The sensitivity of the ion trap, inherent selectivity of MS/MS, and fast response times of these sample introduction systems make these DSITMS techniques suitable for many applications that require on-line, real-time monitoring of VOCs in air. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 14–30, 2000</p>","PeriodicalId":100527,"journal":{"name":"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(2000)4:1<14::AID-FACT3>3.0.CO;2-W","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of two different direct-sampling ion-trap mass-spectrometry methods for monitoring halocarbon compounds in air\",\"authors\":\"Peter T. Palmer,&nbsp;Carla Remigi,&nbsp;Dane Karr\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(2000)4:1<14::AID-FACT3>3.0.CO;2-W\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two different direct-sampling ion-trap mass spectrometry (DSITMS) methods are evaluated for monitoring trace levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air. The first is based on the use of a sample introduction system that mixes the air sample into a helium stream prior to introduction into the ion trap through an open-split interface. The second utilizes a valve and uses zero air to flush the contents of the sample loop into the ion trap. Unique features of this system are its use of air in place of helium as a buffer gas for the ion trap, and the optimization of experimental parameters to maintain sensitivity and unit mass resolution. Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC12) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl<sub>4</sub>) were employed as test compounds for this study. Figures of merit for both sample introduction methods were comparable. Detection limits were approximately 50 parts per billion by volume in MS, selected ion monitoring (SIM), and MS/MS modes. Analysis speeds were on the order of 20 s or less per sample. The sensitivity of the ion trap, inherent selectivity of MS/MS, and fast response times of these sample introduction systems make these DSITMS techniques suitable for many applications that require on-line, real-time monitoring of VOCs in air. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 14–30, 2000</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"14-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(2000)4:1<14::AID-FACT3>3.0.CO;2-W\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6521%282000%294%3A1%3C14%3A%3AAID-FACT3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-W\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6521%282000%294%3A1%3C14%3A%3AAID-FACT3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

评估了两种不同的直接采样离子阱质谱(DSITMS)方法用于监测空气中痕量挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的水平。第一种是基于样品导入系统的使用,该系统在通过开裂界面导入离子阱之前将空气样品混合到氦气流中。第二种利用阀门,使用零空气将样品回路的内容物冲洗到离子阱中。该系统的独特之处在于使用空气代替氦气作为离子阱的缓冲气体,并优化实验参数以保持灵敏度和单位质量分辨率。本研究以二氯二氟甲烷(CFC12)和四氯化碳(CCl4)为试验化合物。两种样品导入方法的价值值具有可比性。在质谱、选定离子监测(SIM)和质谱/质谱模式下,检测限约为十亿分之50。每个样品的分析速度为20秒或更少。离子阱的灵敏度、MS/MS固有的选择性以及这些样品导入系统的快速响应时间使这些DSITMS技术适用于许多需要在线、实时监测空气中VOCs的应用。©2000 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。野外分析化学技术(4):14-30,2000
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of two different direct-sampling ion-trap mass-spectrometry methods for monitoring halocarbon compounds in air

Two different direct-sampling ion-trap mass spectrometry (DSITMS) methods are evaluated for monitoring trace levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air. The first is based on the use of a sample introduction system that mixes the air sample into a helium stream prior to introduction into the ion trap through an open-split interface. The second utilizes a valve and uses zero air to flush the contents of the sample loop into the ion trap. Unique features of this system are its use of air in place of helium as a buffer gas for the ion trap, and the optimization of experimental parameters to maintain sensitivity and unit mass resolution. Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC12) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) were employed as test compounds for this study. Figures of merit for both sample introduction methods were comparable. Detection limits were approximately 50 parts per billion by volume in MS, selected ion monitoring (SIM), and MS/MS modes. Analysis speeds were on the order of 20 s or less per sample. The sensitivity of the ion trap, inherent selectivity of MS/MS, and fast response times of these sample introduction systems make these DSITMS techniques suitable for many applications that require on-line, real-time monitoring of VOCs in air. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 14–30, 2000

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信