指导卫生专业教师增加奖学金的框架:来自ASAHP研究、发现与创新委员会的建议。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01
David A Brown, Fevzi Akinci, Susan Gordon-Hickey, Fang-Ling Lu, Abiodun Akinwuntan
{"title":"指导卫生专业教师增加奖学金的框架:来自ASAHP研究、发现与创新委员会的建议。","authors":"David A Brown,&nbsp;Fevzi Akinci,&nbsp;Susan Gordon-Hickey,&nbsp;Fang-Ling Lu,&nbsp;Abiodun Akinwuntan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Research, Discovery, and Innovation Publications (RDI-P) Task Force met from October 2020 to March 2022 to discuss ways in which the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) can help to guide institutional leaders to assign faculty effort and resources to enable success with the scholarship mission. The purpose of this White Paper is to propose a guiding framework for institutional leaders to determine their faculty's individual or team scholarly goals, assign appropriate percent efforts (funded/unfunded), and guide an overall faculty mix that balances required teaching loads with scholarly activities. The Task Force identified seven modifiable factors that can influence workload allocation for scholarship: 1. Limited range of the spectrum for effort distribution; 2. Matching expectations with reality; 3. Clinical training undervalued as adequate prep for translational or implementation research; 4. Limited support for mentorship availability; 5. Richer collaborations needed; 6. Finding resources and matching them to individual faculty needs; and 7. Further time for training needed. We then provide a set of recommendations to address the seven issues described. Finally, we describe four foci of scholarly activity (evidence-based educator; evidence-based clinical application; evidence-based collaborator; and evidence-based principal leader) with which a leader can develop strategies to align faculty interests and growth opportunities towards advancing scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"52 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework to Guide Health Professions Faculty Towards Increased Scholarship: Recommendations from the ASAHP Research, Discovery & Innovation Committee.\",\"authors\":\"David A Brown,&nbsp;Fevzi Akinci,&nbsp;Susan Gordon-Hickey,&nbsp;Fang-Ling Lu,&nbsp;Abiodun Akinwuntan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Research, Discovery, and Innovation Publications (RDI-P) Task Force met from October 2020 to March 2022 to discuss ways in which the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) can help to guide institutional leaders to assign faculty effort and resources to enable success with the scholarship mission. The purpose of this White Paper is to propose a guiding framework for institutional leaders to determine their faculty's individual or team scholarly goals, assign appropriate percent efforts (funded/unfunded), and guide an overall faculty mix that balances required teaching loads with scholarly activities. The Task Force identified seven modifiable factors that can influence workload allocation for scholarship: 1. Limited range of the spectrum for effort distribution; 2. Matching expectations with reality; 3. Clinical training undervalued as adequate prep for translational or implementation research; 4. Limited support for mentorship availability; 5. Richer collaborations needed; 6. Finding resources and matching them to individual faculty needs; and 7. Further time for training needed. We then provide a set of recommendations to address the seven issues described. Finally, we describe four foci of scholarly activity (evidence-based educator; evidence-based clinical application; evidence-based collaborator; and evidence-based principal leader) with which a leader can develop strategies to align faculty interests and growth opportunities towards advancing scholarship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"3-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究、发现和创新出版物(RDI-P)工作组于2020年10月至2022年3月举行会议,讨论学校促进卫生专业协会(ASAHP)如何帮助指导机构领导人分配教师的努力和资源,以实现奖学金使命的成功。本白皮书的目的是为机构领导者提出一个指导框架,以确定其教师个人或团队的学术目标,分配适当的努力百分比(资助/未资助),并指导整体教师组合,平衡所需的教学负荷和学术活动。工作队确定了可能影响奖学金工作量分配的七个可修改因素:努力分配的频谱范围有限;2. 使期望与现实相符;3.临床培训被低估为转化或实施研究的充分准备;4. 对导师的支持有限;5. 需要更丰富的合作;6. 寻找资源并将其与个别教师的需求相匹配;和7。需要进一步的培训时间。然后,我们提供了一组建议来解决所描述的七个问题。最后,我们描述了学术活动的四个焦点(循证教育家;循证临床应用;以证据为基础的合作者;以及以证据为基础的主要领导者),领导者可以制定战略,使教师的兴趣和成长机会与促进学术发展相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framework to Guide Health Professions Faculty Towards Increased Scholarship: Recommendations from the ASAHP Research, Discovery & Innovation Committee.

The Research, Discovery, and Innovation Publications (RDI-P) Task Force met from October 2020 to March 2022 to discuss ways in which the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) can help to guide institutional leaders to assign faculty effort and resources to enable success with the scholarship mission. The purpose of this White Paper is to propose a guiding framework for institutional leaders to determine their faculty's individual or team scholarly goals, assign appropriate percent efforts (funded/unfunded), and guide an overall faculty mix that balances required teaching loads with scholarly activities. The Task Force identified seven modifiable factors that can influence workload allocation for scholarship: 1. Limited range of the spectrum for effort distribution; 2. Matching expectations with reality; 3. Clinical training undervalued as adequate prep for translational or implementation research; 4. Limited support for mentorship availability; 5. Richer collaborations needed; 6. Finding resources and matching them to individual faculty needs; and 7. Further time for training needed. We then provide a set of recommendations to address the seven issues described. Finally, we describe four foci of scholarly activity (evidence-based educator; evidence-based clinical application; evidence-based collaborator; and evidence-based principal leader) with which a leader can develop strategies to align faculty interests and growth opportunities towards advancing scholarship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信