在澳大利亚维多利亚州,护理人员转诊到全科医生后全科医生的出勤率

Q2 Health Professions
Belinda Delardes, Shamant Prakash, Karen Smith, S. Chakraborty, K. Bowles
{"title":"在澳大利亚维多利亚州,护理人员转诊到全科医生后全科医生的出勤率","authors":"Belinda Delardes, Shamant Prakash, Karen Smith, S. Chakraborty, K. Bowles","doi":"10.1177/27536386231160786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Previous evaluations of paramedic-to-general practitioner (GP) referrals have focused on subsequent emergency department presentations or ambulance representations; however, we aimed to appreciate patient adherence where paramedics have recommended follow-up with a GP. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients in Victoria, Australia, who were referred to a GP by a paramedic over a 28-day period in June 2021. Patients were then contacted within five days to determine subsequent GP attendance. Results Of the 752 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 47% (n = 353) consented to participate. At the time of the survey, 65% of patients had followed up with their GP, with a further 15% booked in for a future appointment. Factors associated with the increased adjusted likelihood of the participant following up with a GP after paramedic referral included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–3.99, P = 0.009) and those given a specific time frame for the follow-up appointment by the paramedics (AOR 3.98, 95% CI 2.26–7.02, P < 0.001). Participants who presented to ambulance services overnight were less likely to follow up with a GP (AOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.68, P = 0.002). The three most commonly stated reasons for not following up with a GP were that the patient felt it was unnecessary (n = 48), their regular GP was unavailable (n = 33) or they had followed up with an alternative service (n = 31). Conclusion Most patients who are referred to a GP by attending paramedics will follow up with a GP within 72 h. The most common barrier to GP follow-up is the patients’ perception that follow-up is unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":55865,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"79 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rates of general practitioner attendance following paramedic-to-general practitioner referral in Victoria, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Delardes, Shamant Prakash, Karen Smith, S. Chakraborty, K. Bowles\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536386231160786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Previous evaluations of paramedic-to-general practitioner (GP) referrals have focused on subsequent emergency department presentations or ambulance representations; however, we aimed to appreciate patient adherence where paramedics have recommended follow-up with a GP. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients in Victoria, Australia, who were referred to a GP by a paramedic over a 28-day period in June 2021. Patients were then contacted within five days to determine subsequent GP attendance. Results Of the 752 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 47% (n = 353) consented to participate. At the time of the survey, 65% of patients had followed up with their GP, with a further 15% booked in for a future appointment. Factors associated with the increased adjusted likelihood of the participant following up with a GP after paramedic referral included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–3.99, P = 0.009) and those given a specific time frame for the follow-up appointment by the paramedics (AOR 3.98, 95% CI 2.26–7.02, P < 0.001). Participants who presented to ambulance services overnight were less likely to follow up with a GP (AOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.68, P = 0.002). The three most commonly stated reasons for not following up with a GP were that the patient felt it was unnecessary (n = 48), their regular GP was unavailable (n = 33) or they had followed up with an alternative service (n = 31). Conclusion Most patients who are referred to a GP by attending paramedics will follow up with a GP within 72 h. The most common barrier to GP follow-up is the patients’ perception that follow-up is unnecessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231160786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231160786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前的评估护理人员到全科医生(GP)转诊集中在随后的急诊科演示或救护车演示;然而,我们的目的是欣赏病人的依从性,护理人员建议与全科医生随访。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是澳大利亚维多利亚州的成年患者,这些患者于2021年6月由一名护理人员转诊至全科医生,为期28天。然后在五天内联系患者以确定随后的全科医生就诊情况。结果752例符合纳入标准的患者中,47% (n = 353)同意参与。在调查期间,65%的患者与他们的全科医生进行了随访,另有15%的患者预约了未来的预约。相关因素包括女性(调整优势比[AOR] 2.21, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.22-3.99, P = 0.009)和给予护理人员随访预约特定时间框架的患者(AOR 3.98, 95% CI 2.26-7.02, P < 0.001)。在救护车服务中过夜的参与者不太可能随访全科医生(AOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.68, P = 0.002)。不去看全科医生的三个最常见的原因是:病人觉得没有必要(n = 48),他们的普通全科医生没空(n = 33),或者他们已经去看了其他服务(n = 31)。结论大多数由护理人员转诊到全科医生的患者会在72小时内进行全科医生随访。全科医生随访最常见的障碍是患者认为没有必要进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rates of general practitioner attendance following paramedic-to-general practitioner referral in Victoria, Australia
Introduction Previous evaluations of paramedic-to-general practitioner (GP) referrals have focused on subsequent emergency department presentations or ambulance representations; however, we aimed to appreciate patient adherence where paramedics have recommended follow-up with a GP. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients in Victoria, Australia, who were referred to a GP by a paramedic over a 28-day period in June 2021. Patients were then contacted within five days to determine subsequent GP attendance. Results Of the 752 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 47% (n = 353) consented to participate. At the time of the survey, 65% of patients had followed up with their GP, with a further 15% booked in for a future appointment. Factors associated with the increased adjusted likelihood of the participant following up with a GP after paramedic referral included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–3.99, P = 0.009) and those given a specific time frame for the follow-up appointment by the paramedics (AOR 3.98, 95% CI 2.26–7.02, P < 0.001). Participants who presented to ambulance services overnight were less likely to follow up with a GP (AOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.68, P = 0.002). The three most commonly stated reasons for not following up with a GP were that the patient felt it was unnecessary (n = 48), their regular GP was unavailable (n = 33) or they had followed up with an alternative service (n = 31). Conclusion Most patients who are referred to a GP by attending paramedics will follow up with a GP within 72 h. The most common barrier to GP follow-up is the patients’ perception that follow-up is unnecessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信