{"title":"很好","authors":"David Kurokawa, A. Procaccia, Junxing Wang","doi":"10.1145/3140756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, focusing on a recently introduced notion of fairness called maximin share guarantee: each player’s value for his allocation should be at least as high as what he can guarantee by dividing the items into as many bundles as there are players and receiving his least desirable bundle. Assuming additive valuation functions, we show that such allocations may not exist, but allocations guaranteeing each player 2/3 of the above value always exist. These theoretical results have direct practical implications.","PeriodicalId":17199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","volume":"19 1","pages":"1 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair Enough\",\"authors\":\"David Kurokawa, A. Procaccia, Junxing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3140756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, focusing on a recently introduced notion of fairness called maximin share guarantee: each player’s value for his allocation should be at least as high as what he can guarantee by dividing the items into as many bundles as there are players and receiving his least desirable bundle. Assuming additive valuation functions, we show that such allocations may not exist, but allocations guaranteeing each player 2/3 of the above value always exist. These theoretical results have direct practical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the ACM (JACM)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the ACM (JACM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3140756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3140756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, focusing on a recently introduced notion of fairness called maximin share guarantee: each player’s value for his allocation should be at least as high as what he can guarantee by dividing the items into as many bundles as there are players and receiving his least desirable bundle. Assuming additive valuation functions, we show that such allocations may not exist, but allocations guaranteeing each player 2/3 of the above value always exist. These theoretical results have direct practical implications.