复杂油气藏离散化方法的比较

D. Hjeij, A. Abushaikha
{"title":"复杂油气藏离散化方法的比较","authors":"D. Hjeij, A. Abushaikha","doi":"10.2118/196727-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Most commercially available simulators use the trivial two-point flux approximation (TPFA) method for flux computation. However, the TPFA only gives consistent solutions when used for K-orthogonal grids. In general, multi-point flux approximation (MPFA) methods perform better under both heterogeneous and anisotropic conditions. The mimetic finite difference (MFD) method is designed to preserve properties on unstructured polyhedral grids, and its development for simulating full tensor permeabilities is also crucial step. This paper compares the performance, accuracy, and efficiency of these schemes for simulating complex synthetic and realistic hydrocarbon reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":11098,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Advanced Discretization Methods for Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"D. Hjeij, A. Abushaikha\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196727-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Most commercially available simulators use the trivial two-point flux approximation (TPFA) method for flux computation. However, the TPFA only gives consistent solutions when used for K-orthogonal grids. In general, multi-point flux approximation (MPFA) methods perform better under both heterogeneous and anisotropic conditions. The mimetic finite difference (MFD) method is designed to preserve properties on unstructured polyhedral grids, and its development for simulating full tensor permeabilities is also crucial step. This paper compares the performance, accuracy, and efficiency of these schemes for simulating complex synthetic and realistic hydrocarbon reservoirs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196727-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196727-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大多数商用模拟器使用平凡两点通量近似(TPFA)方法进行通量计算。然而,TPFA仅在用于k正交网格时给出一致解。一般来说,多点通量近似(MPFA)方法在非均质和各向异性条件下都表现较好。模拟有限差分(MFD)方法是为了在非结构化多面体网格上保持特性而设计的,开发模拟全张量渗透率的方法也是关键的一步。本文比较了这些方案在模拟复杂合成油气藏和真实油气藏时的性能、精度和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Advanced Discretization Methods for Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs
Most commercially available simulators use the trivial two-point flux approximation (TPFA) method for flux computation. However, the TPFA only gives consistent solutions when used for K-orthogonal grids. In general, multi-point flux approximation (MPFA) methods perform better under both heterogeneous and anisotropic conditions. The mimetic finite difference (MFD) method is designed to preserve properties on unstructured polyhedral grids, and its development for simulating full tensor permeabilities is also crucial step. This paper compares the performance, accuracy, and efficiency of these schemes for simulating complex synthetic and realistic hydrocarbon reservoirs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信