AO/OTA型31-A2型股骨粗隆骨折采用动力髋螺钉与2侧螺钉与4侧螺钉固定的比较

Ruei-Cheng Yang, M. Lin, Jui-Sheng Sun
{"title":"AO/OTA型31-A2型股骨粗隆骨折采用动力髋螺钉与2侧螺钉与4侧螺钉固定的比较","authors":"Ruei-Cheng Yang, M. Lin, Jui-Sheng Sun","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.20151211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treating AO/OTA Type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture with closed reduction and internal fixation utilizing a dynamic hip screw (DHS) with 4 side screws has been undoubtedly the most common surgical method. Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore whether a DHS with 4 side screws can be substituted by a DHS with 2 side screws when treating this type of injury. Methods: In total, 259 patients with AO/OTA type 31-A2 pertrochanteric femoral fracture fixed using a DHS with 4 side screws or 2 side screws were retrieved retrospectively for dates from December 2004 to December 2007. In this study, the 128 fractures fixed with DHS with 2 side screws were classified into group A, while the 131 fractures fixed with DHS with 4 side screws were classified into group B. Demographic and clinical parameters, such as age, gender, injury site, surgical time, amount of blood transfusion, and whether major implant related complication developed, were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences between the two groups for demographic parameters such as sex, age, and injury site were found. The surgical time of group A (87.6 ± 28.3, range: 35- 175 minutes) was significantly shorter than the surgical time of group B (109.8 ± 34.1, range: 40-210 minutes) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the amount of blood transfusion for group A (2.16 ± 2.16, range: 0- 10 units) was significantly less than the amount of blood transfusion for group B (2.98 ± 2.37, range: 0-8 units) (p = 0.004). The development of major implant related complications among patients in group A was statistically equivalent to group B. Conclusion: Treatment of AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture by DHS with 2 side screws gave a comparable outcome with respect to the development of major implant related complications and was superior in terms of surgical time and amount of blood transfusion compared with a DHS with 4 side screws. The use of a DHS with 2 side screws can therefore be regarded as an alternative implant to a DHS with 4 side screws when treating AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"62 1","pages":"135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between AO/OTA Type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture fixed with dynamic hip screw with two and four side screws\",\"authors\":\"Ruei-Cheng Yang, M. Lin, Jui-Sheng Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.6492/FJMD.20151211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Treating AO/OTA Type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture with closed reduction and internal fixation utilizing a dynamic hip screw (DHS) with 4 side screws has been undoubtedly the most common surgical method. Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore whether a DHS with 4 side screws can be substituted by a DHS with 2 side screws when treating this type of injury. Methods: In total, 259 patients with AO/OTA type 31-A2 pertrochanteric femoral fracture fixed using a DHS with 4 side screws or 2 side screws were retrieved retrospectively for dates from December 2004 to December 2007. In this study, the 128 fractures fixed with DHS with 2 side screws were classified into group A, while the 131 fractures fixed with DHS with 4 side screws were classified into group B. Demographic and clinical parameters, such as age, gender, injury site, surgical time, amount of blood transfusion, and whether major implant related complication developed, were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences between the two groups for demographic parameters such as sex, age, and injury site were found. The surgical time of group A (87.6 ± 28.3, range: 35- 175 minutes) was significantly shorter than the surgical time of group B (109.8 ± 34.1, range: 40-210 minutes) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the amount of blood transfusion for group A (2.16 ± 2.16, range: 0- 10 units) was significantly less than the amount of blood transfusion for group B (2.98 ± 2.37, range: 0-8 units) (p = 0.004). The development of major implant related complications among patients in group A was statistically equivalent to group B. Conclusion: Treatment of AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture by DHS with 2 side screws gave a comparable outcome with respect to the development of major implant related complications and was superior in terms of surgical time and amount of blood transfusion compared with a DHS with 4 side screws. The use of a DHS with 2 side screws can therefore be regarded as an alternative implant to a DHS with 4 side screws when treating AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"135-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.20151211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.20151211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用4侧动态髋螺钉(DHS)闭合复位内固定治疗AO/OTA 31-A2型股骨粗隆骨折无疑是最常用的手术方法。目的:本研究的目的是探讨在治疗这种类型的损伤时,是否可以用带2侧螺钉的DHS代替带4侧螺钉的DHS。方法:回顾性分析2004年12月至2007年12月期间259例AO/OTA型31-A2型股骨粗隆骨折采用DHS + 4侧螺钉或2侧螺钉固定。本研究将128例2侧螺钉DHS固定的骨折分为A组,131例4侧螺钉DHS固定的骨折分为b组。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、损伤部位、手术时间、输血量、是否发生与种植体相关的主要并发症等人口学及临床参数。结果:两组在性别、年龄、损伤部位等人口学参数上无显著差异。A组手术时间(87.6±28.3,范围:35 ~ 175 min)明显短于B组(109.8±34.1,范围:40 ~ 210 min) (p < 0.001)。A组输血次数(2.16±2.16,范围:0 ~ 10单位)明显少于B组输血次数(2.98±2.37,范围:0 ~ 8单位)(p = 0.004)。A组患者与b组患者主要假体相关并发症的发生在统计学上相当。结论:采用DHS + 2侧螺钉治疗AO/OTA型31-A2股骨粗隆骨折在主要假体相关并发症的发生方面与采用DHS + 4侧螺钉治疗相比,在手术时间和输血量方面均优于DHS + 4侧螺钉治疗。因此,在治疗AO/OTA型31-A2股骨粗隆骨折时,使用带2侧螺钉的DHS可作为带4侧螺钉的DHS的替代植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between AO/OTA Type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture fixed with dynamic hip screw with two and four side screws
Background: Treating AO/OTA Type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture with closed reduction and internal fixation utilizing a dynamic hip screw (DHS) with 4 side screws has been undoubtedly the most common surgical method. Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore whether a DHS with 4 side screws can be substituted by a DHS with 2 side screws when treating this type of injury. Methods: In total, 259 patients with AO/OTA type 31-A2 pertrochanteric femoral fracture fixed using a DHS with 4 side screws or 2 side screws were retrieved retrospectively for dates from December 2004 to December 2007. In this study, the 128 fractures fixed with DHS with 2 side screws were classified into group A, while the 131 fractures fixed with DHS with 4 side screws were classified into group B. Demographic and clinical parameters, such as age, gender, injury site, surgical time, amount of blood transfusion, and whether major implant related complication developed, were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences between the two groups for demographic parameters such as sex, age, and injury site were found. The surgical time of group A (87.6 ± 28.3, range: 35- 175 minutes) was significantly shorter than the surgical time of group B (109.8 ± 34.1, range: 40-210 minutes) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the amount of blood transfusion for group A (2.16 ± 2.16, range: 0- 10 units) was significantly less than the amount of blood transfusion for group B (2.98 ± 2.37, range: 0-8 units) (p = 0.004). The development of major implant related complications among patients in group A was statistically equivalent to group B. Conclusion: Treatment of AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture by DHS with 2 side screws gave a comparable outcome with respect to the development of major implant related complications and was superior in terms of surgical time and amount of blood transfusion compared with a DHS with 4 side screws. The use of a DHS with 2 side screws can therefore be regarded as an alternative implant to a DHS with 4 side screws when treating AO/OTA type 31-A2 femoral pertrochanteric fracture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信