运用层次分析法对公路隧道风险因素进行排序

Jubing Zhang, M. Cai, Xiao-peng Li, Zai-gen Mu
{"title":"运用层次分析法对公路隧道风险因素进行排序","authors":"Jubing Zhang, M. Cai, Xiao-peng Li, Zai-gen Mu","doi":"10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the risk evaluation of a highway tunnel, the recognized risk factors are categorized into two hierarchies. The first hierarchy consists of seven items, which are topography, geology, unfavorable geological condition, special stratigraphy, structural design, tunnel section and depth of embedment, shafts and pilot tunnels. An Analytic Hierarchy Process model is established to prioritize the risk factors in highway tunnels. In the decision making procedure, five experienced experts were organized and surveyed to give their judgments on the importance of different influencing factors to work out the priority. In order to verify the validity of the AHP analysis, two other experts were asked to give their comprehensive evaluation on the same question, results from the two processes are close to each other, this indicates that the AHP method adopted in prioritizing the risk factors of tunnel construction is effective and exercisable, it can be further developed to satisfy the requirements of the risk evaluation process for highway tunnels.","PeriodicalId":6408,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology","volume":"25 1","pages":"1205-1207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing highway tunnel risk factors with AHP method\",\"authors\":\"Jubing Zhang, M. Cai, Xiao-peng Li, Zai-gen Mu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the risk evaluation of a highway tunnel, the recognized risk factors are categorized into two hierarchies. The first hierarchy consists of seven items, which are topography, geology, unfavorable geological condition, special stratigraphy, structural design, tunnel section and depth of embedment, shafts and pilot tunnels. An Analytic Hierarchy Process model is established to prioritize the risk factors in highway tunnels. In the decision making procedure, five experienced experts were organized and surveyed to give their judgments on the importance of different influencing factors to work out the priority. In order to verify the validity of the AHP analysis, two other experts were asked to give their comprehensive evaluation on the same question, results from the two processes are close to each other, this indicates that the AHP method adopted in prioritizing the risk factors of tunnel construction is effective and exercisable, it can be further developed to satisfy the requirements of the risk evaluation process for highway tunnels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1205-1207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在公路隧道风险评价中,将已识别的风险因素分为两个层次。第一层次包括地形、地质、不利地质条件、特殊地层、结构设计、隧道断面和埋深、竖井和导洞等7个项目。建立了层次分析法对公路隧道风险因素进行排序。在决策过程中,组织5位经验丰富的专家进行问卷调查,对不同影响因素的重要性进行判断,确定优先级。为了验证AHP分析的有效性,请另外两位专家对同一问题进行了综合评价,两个过程的评价结果接近,说明AHP方法在隧道施工风险因素排序中是有效的、可操作的,可以进一步发展,以满足公路隧道风险评价过程的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing highway tunnel risk factors with AHP method
In the risk evaluation of a highway tunnel, the recognized risk factors are categorized into two hierarchies. The first hierarchy consists of seven items, which are topography, geology, unfavorable geological condition, special stratigraphy, structural design, tunnel section and depth of embedment, shafts and pilot tunnels. An Analytic Hierarchy Process model is established to prioritize the risk factors in highway tunnels. In the decision making procedure, five experienced experts were organized and surveyed to give their judgments on the importance of different influencing factors to work out the priority. In order to verify the validity of the AHP analysis, two other experts were asked to give their comprehensive evaluation on the same question, results from the two processes are close to each other, this indicates that the AHP method adopted in prioritizing the risk factors of tunnel construction is effective and exercisable, it can be further developed to satisfy the requirements of the risk evaluation process for highway tunnels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信