物理治疗有助于患者从机械通气中脱机和拔管

D. Morar, H. V. Aswegen
{"title":"物理治疗有助于患者从机械通气中脱机和拔管","authors":"D. Morar, H. V. Aswegen","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I1.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Liberation of patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important goal of patient care, to avoid the complications and risks associated with prolonged MV. Objective. To determine the extent of South African physiotherapists’ involvement in weaning and extubation of patients from MV and whether current practice is evidence based. Method. A survey questionnaire was developed, and content validated and made available electronically and in hard copy. Physiotherapists working in adult intensive care units in public and private sector hospitals in South Africa (SA) were identified and invited to participate. Results. Response rate was 43% (n=184). The majority of respondents (n=135, 73%) ‘never’ or ‘seldom’ got involved in decision-making to wean patients from MV; a minority (n=8, 4%) were ‘routinely’ involved in decision-making. Some respondents (n=54, 29%) performed extubation ‘often’ or ‘routinely’. The majority used exercises (n=149, 81%), early mobilisation out of bed (n=142, 77%) and deep breathing exercises (DBEs) (n=142, 77%) ‘routinely’ to aid in respiratory muscle training. The majority of respondents ‘never’ adjusted ventilator settings other than fraction of inspired oxygen. No association was found between type of physiotherapy degree respondents held and their involvement in weaning (p=0.24). Conclusion. SA physiotherapists’ contributions towards weaning of patients from MV through prescription of exercise therapy, early outof- bed mobilisation and DBEs is evidence based. Involvement in adjustment of MV settings, decision-making regarding patient weaning, development of weaning protocols for their units and extubation is limited.","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"16 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapy contributions to weaning and extubation of patients from mechanical ventilation\",\"authors\":\"D. Morar, H. V. Aswegen\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I1.254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Liberation of patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important goal of patient care, to avoid the complications and risks associated with prolonged MV. Objective. To determine the extent of South African physiotherapists’ involvement in weaning and extubation of patients from MV and whether current practice is evidence based. Method. A survey questionnaire was developed, and content validated and made available electronically and in hard copy. Physiotherapists working in adult intensive care units in public and private sector hospitals in South Africa (SA) were identified and invited to participate. Results. Response rate was 43% (n=184). The majority of respondents (n=135, 73%) ‘never’ or ‘seldom’ got involved in decision-making to wean patients from MV; a minority (n=8, 4%) were ‘routinely’ involved in decision-making. Some respondents (n=54, 29%) performed extubation ‘often’ or ‘routinely’. The majority used exercises (n=149, 81%), early mobilisation out of bed (n=142, 77%) and deep breathing exercises (DBEs) (n=142, 77%) ‘routinely’ to aid in respiratory muscle training. The majority of respondents ‘never’ adjusted ventilator settings other than fraction of inspired oxygen. No association was found between type of physiotherapy degree respondents held and their involvement in weaning (p=0.24). Conclusion. SA physiotherapists’ contributions towards weaning of patients from MV through prescription of exercise therapy, early outof- bed mobilisation and DBEs is evidence based. Involvement in adjustment of MV settings, decision-making regarding patient weaning, development of weaning protocols for their units and extubation is limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I1.254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I1.254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景。将患者从机械通气(MV)中解放出来是患者护理的一个重要目标,以避免长期机械通气相关的并发症和风险。目标。确定南非物理治疗师参与MV患者脱机和拔管的程度,以及目前的实践是否基于证据。方法。编制了一份调查问卷,对内容进行了验证,并以电子和硬拷贝的形式提供。在南非公立和私营医院的成人重症监护病房工作的物理治疗师被确定并邀请参加。结果。有效率为43% (n=184)。大多数受访者(n=135, 73%)“从未”或“很少”参与患者戒断MV的决策;少数人(n= 8.4%)“常规地”参与决策。一些应答者(n= 54,29 %)“经常”或“常规”拔管。大多数患者“常规”使用锻炼(n=149, 81%)、早期下床活动(n=142, 77%)和深呼吸练习(n=142, 77%)来辅助呼吸肌训练。大多数受访者“从未”调整呼吸机设置,而不是吸入氧气的一部分。被调查者所接受的物理治疗程度类型与他们是否参与断奶没有关联(p=0.24)。结论。SA物理治疗师通过处方运动疗法,早期下床活动和DBEs对患者从MV中断奶的贡献是基于证据的。参与MV设置的调整,关于患者脱机的决策,制定脱机方案的单位和拔管是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiotherapy contributions to weaning and extubation of patients from mechanical ventilation
Background. Liberation of patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important goal of patient care, to avoid the complications and risks associated with prolonged MV. Objective. To determine the extent of South African physiotherapists’ involvement in weaning and extubation of patients from MV and whether current practice is evidence based. Method. A survey questionnaire was developed, and content validated and made available electronically and in hard copy. Physiotherapists working in adult intensive care units in public and private sector hospitals in South Africa (SA) were identified and invited to participate. Results. Response rate was 43% (n=184). The majority of respondents (n=135, 73%) ‘never’ or ‘seldom’ got involved in decision-making to wean patients from MV; a minority (n=8, 4%) were ‘routinely’ involved in decision-making. Some respondents (n=54, 29%) performed extubation ‘often’ or ‘routinely’. The majority used exercises (n=149, 81%), early mobilisation out of bed (n=142, 77%) and deep breathing exercises (DBEs) (n=142, 77%) ‘routinely’ to aid in respiratory muscle training. The majority of respondents ‘never’ adjusted ventilator settings other than fraction of inspired oxygen. No association was found between type of physiotherapy degree respondents held and their involvement in weaning (p=0.24). Conclusion. SA physiotherapists’ contributions towards weaning of patients from MV through prescription of exercise therapy, early outof- bed mobilisation and DBEs is evidence based. Involvement in adjustment of MV settings, decision-making regarding patient weaning, development of weaning protocols for their units and extubation is limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信