文学研究新范式的兴起:数字人文学科的挑战

Ning Wang
{"title":"文学研究新范式的兴起:数字人文学科的挑战","authors":"Ning Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.techum.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital humanities has become a heatedly discussed and even debated topic among humanities scholars. It is true that it has made a revolutionary impact on the teaching and academic research of humanities scholars, which has also raised a severe challenge to traditional humanities scholars who are not ready for the impact of this trend. But in any event, it indicates a shift of paradigm of research, which marks the rise of a new academic paradigm and reading method in humanities studies. It at least bridges the gap between science and technology and the humanities and makes humanities scholars more efficiently digitizing their research results. This is especially true in literary studies, or more specifically, comparative and world literature studies. The so-called “distant reading” is a new way of researching world literature. Comparatists could use such a distant reading method to have a general picture of the historical development and evolution of world literature. But at the same time, close reading is also important which could for literary scholars to have a deep-going research and analysis of individual literary works. Thus it is necessary for comparatists to combine the two different reading methods in comparative and world literature studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100956,"journal":{"name":"New Techno-Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329422000255/pdfft?md5=7bd1bfa8663201e14c811d0eeaf1a76d&pid=1-s2.0-S2664329422000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rise of a new paradigm of literary studies: The challenge of digital humanities\",\"authors\":\"Ning Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techum.2022.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Digital humanities has become a heatedly discussed and even debated topic among humanities scholars. It is true that it has made a revolutionary impact on the teaching and academic research of humanities scholars, which has also raised a severe challenge to traditional humanities scholars who are not ready for the impact of this trend. But in any event, it indicates a shift of paradigm of research, which marks the rise of a new academic paradigm and reading method in humanities studies. It at least bridges the gap between science and technology and the humanities and makes humanities scholars more efficiently digitizing their research results. This is especially true in literary studies, or more specifically, comparative and world literature studies. The so-called “distant reading” is a new way of researching world literature. Comparatists could use such a distant reading method to have a general picture of the historical development and evolution of world literature. But at the same time, close reading is also important which could for literary scholars to have a deep-going research and analysis of individual literary works. Thus it is necessary for comparatists to combine the two different reading methods in comparative and world literature studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Techno-Humanities\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 28-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329422000255/pdfft?md5=7bd1bfa8663201e14c811d0eeaf1a76d&pid=1-s2.0-S2664329422000255-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Techno-Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329422000255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Techno-Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664329422000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数字人文已经成为人文学者们热烈讨论甚至争论的话题。诚然,它对人文学者的教学和学术研究产生了革命性的影响,这也对传统的人文学者提出了严峻的挑战,他们还没有准备好应对这一趋势的影响。但无论如何,它标志着研究范式的转变,标志着人文学科新的学术范式和阅读方法的兴起。它至少在科学技术和人文之间架起了一座桥梁,使人文学者更有效地将他们的研究成果数字化。在文学研究中尤其如此,或者更具体地说,在比较文学和世界文学研究中更是如此。所谓“远读”是研究世界文学的一种新方式。比较学者可以利用这种远观阅读的方法,对世界文学的历史发展和演变有一个大致的了解。但与此同时,细读也很重要,它可以让文学学者对个别文学作品进行深入的研究和分析。因此,比较学者在比较文学和世界文学研究中有必要将这两种不同的阅读方法结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The rise of a new paradigm of literary studies: The challenge of digital humanities

Digital humanities has become a heatedly discussed and even debated topic among humanities scholars. It is true that it has made a revolutionary impact on the teaching and academic research of humanities scholars, which has also raised a severe challenge to traditional humanities scholars who are not ready for the impact of this trend. But in any event, it indicates a shift of paradigm of research, which marks the rise of a new academic paradigm and reading method in humanities studies. It at least bridges the gap between science and technology and the humanities and makes humanities scholars more efficiently digitizing their research results. This is especially true in literary studies, or more specifically, comparative and world literature studies. The so-called “distant reading” is a new way of researching world literature. Comparatists could use such a distant reading method to have a general picture of the historical development and evolution of world literature. But at the same time, close reading is also important which could for literary scholars to have a deep-going research and analysis of individual literary works. Thus it is necessary for comparatists to combine the two different reading methods in comparative and world literature studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信