“现在轮到你了!”民族志田野调查中的定位和边界转移

{"title":"“现在轮到你了!”民族志田野调查中的定位和边界转移","authors":"","doi":"10.32887/issn.2527-2551v15p.166-186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of migration studies there has been significant debate around the advantages associated with sharing a national or ethnic belonging with research participants. This article joins the recent contributions of female migrant investigators who have opted for what I here refer to as positional reflexivity, questioning the aprioristic conditions of insiderness or outsiderness and advocating for a constant revision of the positionalities and negotiations of power that come into play in the field. I describe the considerations generated by the implementation of this approach in a qualitative study I carried out in the Italian region of Veneto, in which I examined the complex and shifting boundaries that were explicitly mentioned during my encounters with key informants\nin institutional and associational environments, as well as during interviews with first and second generation Argentinian migrants. I observe that multiple positionalities such as legal status, university position, national and provincial origin, ethnic origin,migratory generation, gender and age conditioned my interactions with research participants.","PeriodicalId":30176,"journal":{"name":"OPSIS Revista do Departamento de Historia e Ciencias Sociais","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“NOW IT’S YOUR TURN!” IDENTIFYING POSITIONALITIES ANDBOUNDARY SHIFTING IN ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELDWORK\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.32887/issn.2527-2551v15p.166-186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of migration studies there has been significant debate around the advantages associated with sharing a national or ethnic belonging with research participants. This article joins the recent contributions of female migrant investigators who have opted for what I here refer to as positional reflexivity, questioning the aprioristic conditions of insiderness or outsiderness and advocating for a constant revision of the positionalities and negotiations of power that come into play in the field. I describe the considerations generated by the implementation of this approach in a qualitative study I carried out in the Italian region of Veneto, in which I examined the complex and shifting boundaries that were explicitly mentioned during my encounters with key informants\\nin institutional and associational environments, as well as during interviews with first and second generation Argentinian migrants. I observe that multiple positionalities such as legal status, university position, national and provincial origin, ethnic origin,migratory generation, gender and age conditioned my interactions with research participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OPSIS Revista do Departamento de Historia e Ciencias Sociais\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OPSIS Revista do Departamento de Historia e Ciencias Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32887/issn.2527-2551v15p.166-186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPSIS Revista do Departamento de Historia e Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32887/issn.2527-2551v15p.166-186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在移民研究领域,关于与研究参与者共享国家或种族归属的好处一直存在重大辩论。这篇文章加入了女性移民研究者最近的贡献,她们选择了我在这里所说的位置反身性,质疑内部或外部的先验条件,并倡导不断修订在该领域发挥作用的位置性和权力谈判。我描述了我在意大利威尼托地区进行的一项定性研究中实施这一方法所产生的考虑因素,在这项研究中,我研究了在我与机构和协会环境中的关键线人的接触中以及在对第一代和第二代阿根廷移民的采访中明确提到的复杂和不断变化的边界。我观察到,法律地位、大学职位、国籍和省份、民族、移民一代、性别和年龄等多重身份限制了我与研究参与者的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“NOW IT’S YOUR TURN!” IDENTIFYING POSITIONALITIES ANDBOUNDARY SHIFTING IN ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELDWORK
In the field of migration studies there has been significant debate around the advantages associated with sharing a national or ethnic belonging with research participants. This article joins the recent contributions of female migrant investigators who have opted for what I here refer to as positional reflexivity, questioning the aprioristic conditions of insiderness or outsiderness and advocating for a constant revision of the positionalities and negotiations of power that come into play in the field. I describe the considerations generated by the implementation of this approach in a qualitative study I carried out in the Italian region of Veneto, in which I examined the complex and shifting boundaries that were explicitly mentioned during my encounters with key informants in institutional and associational environments, as well as during interviews with first and second generation Argentinian migrants. I observe that multiple positionalities such as legal status, university position, national and provincial origin, ethnic origin,migratory generation, gender and age conditioned my interactions with research participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信