使用机器学习算法研究税收、法规和不平等

Julian Neñer, B. Cardoso, M. F. Laguna, S. Gonçalves, J. R. Iglesias
{"title":"使用机器学习算法研究税收、法规和不平等","authors":"Julian Neñer, B. Cardoso, M. F. Laguna, S. Gonçalves, J. R. Iglesias","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2021.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic machine learning (ML) algorithms to train agents in the Yard–Sale model proved very useful for finding optimal strategies that maximize their wealth. However, the main result indicates that the more significant the fraction of rational agents, the greater the inequality at the collective level. From social and economic viewpoints, this is an undesirable result since high inequality diminishes liquidity and trade. Besides, with very few exceptions, most agents end up with zero wealth, despite the inclusion of rational behaviour. To deal with this situation, here we include a taxation–redistribution mechanism in the ML algorithm. Previous results show that simple regulations can considerably reduce inequality if agents do not change their behaviour. However, when considering rational agents, different types of redistribution favour risk-averse agents, to some extent. Even so, we find that rational agents looking for optimal wealth can always arrive to an optimal risk, compatible with a particular choice of parameters, but increasing inequality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.","PeriodicalId":20020,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of taxes, regulations and inequality using machine learning algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Julian Neñer, B. Cardoso, M. F. Laguna, S. Gonçalves, J. R. Iglesias\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsta.2021.0165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genetic machine learning (ML) algorithms to train agents in the Yard–Sale model proved very useful for finding optimal strategies that maximize their wealth. However, the main result indicates that the more significant the fraction of rational agents, the greater the inequality at the collective level. From social and economic viewpoints, this is an undesirable result since high inequality diminishes liquidity and trade. Besides, with very few exceptions, most agents end up with zero wealth, despite the inclusion of rational behaviour. To deal with this situation, here we include a taxation–redistribution mechanism in the ML algorithm. Previous results show that simple regulations can considerably reduce inequality if agents do not change their behaviour. However, when considering rational agents, different types of redistribution favour risk-averse agents, to some extent. Even so, we find that rational agents looking for optimal wealth can always arrive to an optimal risk, compatible with a particular choice of parameters, but increasing inequality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

遗传机器学习(ML)算法用于训练旧货甩卖模型中的代理,对于找到使其财富最大化的最佳策略非常有用。然而,主要结果表明,理性主体的比例越显著,在集体层面上的不平等越大。从社会和经济的角度来看,这是一个不受欢迎的结果,因为高度不平等会减少流动性和贸易。此外,除了极少数例外,尽管包含了理性行为,但大多数代理人最终都是零财富。为了处理这种情况,我们在ML算法中加入了税收再分配机制。先前的研究结果表明,如果代理人不改变他们的行为,简单的监管可以大大减少不平等。然而,当考虑理性主体时,不同类型的再分配在一定程度上有利于风险规避主体。即便如此,我们发现寻找最优财富的理性代理人总能得到最优风险,与特定参数选择相容,但会增加不平等。本文是“社会和经济的动态交换模型”主题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of taxes, regulations and inequality using machine learning algorithms
Genetic machine learning (ML) algorithms to train agents in the Yard–Sale model proved very useful for finding optimal strategies that maximize their wealth. However, the main result indicates that the more significant the fraction of rational agents, the greater the inequality at the collective level. From social and economic viewpoints, this is an undesirable result since high inequality diminishes liquidity and trade. Besides, with very few exceptions, most agents end up with zero wealth, despite the inclusion of rational behaviour. To deal with this situation, here we include a taxation–redistribution mechanism in the ML algorithm. Previous results show that simple regulations can considerably reduce inequality if agents do not change their behaviour. However, when considering rational agents, different types of redistribution favour risk-averse agents, to some extent. Even so, we find that rational agents looking for optimal wealth can always arrive to an optimal risk, compatible with a particular choice of parameters, but increasing inequality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信