早期给予托珠单抗对COVID-19患者呼吸衰竭进展的影响

Q4 Medicine
Z. Merzhoeva, A. Yaroshetskiy, S. A. Savko, A. P. Krasnoshchekova, I. Mandel, N. Tsareva, N. Trushenko, G. Nuralieva, S. Avdeev
{"title":"早期给予托珠单抗对COVID-19患者呼吸衰竭进展的影响","authors":"Z. Merzhoeva, A. Yaroshetskiy, S. A. Savko, A. P. Krasnoshchekova, I. Mandel, N. Tsareva, N. Trushenko, G. Nuralieva, S. Avdeev","doi":"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-472-487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal interval for initiating tocilizumab therapy in patients with COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019) has not been determined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing tocilizumab depending on the duration of persistent hyperthermia > 38 °С in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related CoronaVirus 2) associated pneumonia who received tocilizumab according to the Interim Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (version at the time of inclusion in the study). Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients (n = 163) with SARS-CoV-2-associated pneumonia from May 2020 to May 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups depending on the time of tocilizumab administration: ≤ 7 days (n = 61) or ≥ 8 days (n = 102) from the disease onset. Results. Patients who received tocilizumab in the first 7 days had the lower need for CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) therapy on day 3 after tocilizumab therapy (HR (Hazard Ratio) – 0.129 (0.039 – 0.430); p = 0.001), a higher probability of a decrease in the volume of lung lesions on computed tomography > 25% a week after the use of tocilizumab (HR – 1.065 (1.036 – 1.093); p = 0.001), the lower probability of hemoglobin oxygen saturation below 92% on day 3 (HR – 0.807 (0.750 – 0.869); p = 0.001), and day 7 (HR – 0.825 (0.772 – 0.883); p = 0.001) after tocilizumab therapy. If CPAP therapy was required on day 3 after administration of tocilizumab, each day of delay in prescribing the drug increased the risk of an adverse outcome 18-fold (HR – 18.24 (5.328 – 62.438); p = 0.001). The duration of hospitalization was significantly lower in the early group than in the late group (10 (8.5 – 15) vs 13.5 (10 – 18) days, respectively; p = 0.02). The mortality was similar (5 (8.2%) vs 6 (5.9%) patients, respectively; p = 0.748). Conclusion. The administration of tocilizumab in the first seven days from the onset of the disease in patients with COVID-19 who developed systemic inflammation and lung damage may prevent the need for escalation of respiratory support and accelerate recovery compared with the later tocilizumab administration.","PeriodicalId":37383,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of early tocilizumab administration on the progression of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients\",\"authors\":\"Z. Merzhoeva, A. Yaroshetskiy, S. A. Savko, A. P. Krasnoshchekova, I. Mandel, N. Tsareva, N. Trushenko, G. Nuralieva, S. Avdeev\",\"doi\":\"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-472-487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The optimal interval for initiating tocilizumab therapy in patients with COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019) has not been determined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing tocilizumab depending on the duration of persistent hyperthermia > 38 °С in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related CoronaVirus 2) associated pneumonia who received tocilizumab according to the Interim Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (version at the time of inclusion in the study). Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients (n = 163) with SARS-CoV-2-associated pneumonia from May 2020 to May 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups depending on the time of tocilizumab administration: ≤ 7 days (n = 61) or ≥ 8 days (n = 102) from the disease onset. Results. Patients who received tocilizumab in the first 7 days had the lower need for CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) therapy on day 3 after tocilizumab therapy (HR (Hazard Ratio) – 0.129 (0.039 – 0.430); p = 0.001), a higher probability of a decrease in the volume of lung lesions on computed tomography > 25% a week after the use of tocilizumab (HR – 1.065 (1.036 – 1.093); p = 0.001), the lower probability of hemoglobin oxygen saturation below 92% on day 3 (HR – 0.807 (0.750 – 0.869); p = 0.001), and day 7 (HR – 0.825 (0.772 – 0.883); p = 0.001) after tocilizumab therapy. If CPAP therapy was required on day 3 after administration of tocilizumab, each day of delay in prescribing the drug increased the risk of an adverse outcome 18-fold (HR – 18.24 (5.328 – 62.438); p = 0.001). The duration of hospitalization was significantly lower in the early group than in the late group (10 (8.5 – 15) vs 13.5 (10 – 18) days, respectively; p = 0.02). The mortality was similar (5 (8.2%) vs 6 (5.9%) patients, respectively; p = 0.748). Conclusion. The administration of tocilizumab in the first seven days from the onset of the disease in patients with COVID-19 who developed systemic inflammation and lung damage may prevent the need for escalation of respiratory support and accelerate recovery compared with the later tocilizumab administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonologiya\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-472-487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-4-472-487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19(冠状病毒病2019)患者启动托珠单抗治疗的最佳时间间隔尚未确定。该研究的目的是评估根据俄罗斯联邦卫生部临时指南(纳入研究时的版本)接受托珠单抗治疗的SARS-CoV-2(严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒2)相关肺炎患者持续高热> 38°С的持续时间,开具托珠单抗处方的有效性。方法。对2020年5月至2021年5月住院的sars - cov -2相关肺炎患者(n = 163)进行了回顾性队列研究。根据tocilizumab给药时间将患者回顾性分为两组:发病≤7天(n = 61)或≥8天(n = 102)。结果。前7天接受托珠单抗治疗的患者在托珠单抗治疗后第3天对CPAP(持续气道正压)治疗的需求较低(HR(危险比)- 0.129 (0.039 - 0.430);p = 0.001),使用tocilizumab一周后,计算机断层扫描上肺部病变体积减少> 25%的概率更高(HR - 1.065 (1.036 - 1.093);p = 0.001),第3天血红蛋白氧饱和度低于92%的概率较低(HR - 0.807 (0.750 - 0.869);p = 0.001),第7天(HR - 0.825 (0.772 - 0.883);P = 0.001)。如果在给予托珠单抗后第3天需要CPAP治疗,每延迟一天,不良后果的风险增加18倍(HR - 18.24 (5.328 - 62.438);P = 0.001)。早期组住院时间明显低于晚期组(分别为10(8.5 - 15)天和13.5(10 - 18)天;P = 0.02)。死亡率相似(分别为5例(8.2%)和6例(5.9%);P = 0.748)。结论。与后来的托珠单抗治疗相比,在发生全身性炎症和肺损伤的COVID-19患者发病后的头7天内给予托珠单抗治疗可以防止呼吸支持升级的需要,并加速恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of early tocilizumab administration on the progression of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients
The optimal interval for initiating tocilizumab therapy in patients with COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019) has not been determined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing tocilizumab depending on the duration of persistent hyperthermia > 38 °С in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related CoronaVirus 2) associated pneumonia who received tocilizumab according to the Interim Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (version at the time of inclusion in the study). Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients (n = 163) with SARS-CoV-2-associated pneumonia from May 2020 to May 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups depending on the time of tocilizumab administration: ≤ 7 days (n = 61) or ≥ 8 days (n = 102) from the disease onset. Results. Patients who received tocilizumab in the first 7 days had the lower need for CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) therapy on day 3 after tocilizumab therapy (HR (Hazard Ratio) – 0.129 (0.039 – 0.430); p = 0.001), a higher probability of a decrease in the volume of lung lesions on computed tomography > 25% a week after the use of tocilizumab (HR – 1.065 (1.036 – 1.093); p = 0.001), the lower probability of hemoglobin oxygen saturation below 92% on day 3 (HR – 0.807 (0.750 – 0.869); p = 0.001), and day 7 (HR – 0.825 (0.772 – 0.883); p = 0.001) after tocilizumab therapy. If CPAP therapy was required on day 3 after administration of tocilizumab, each day of delay in prescribing the drug increased the risk of an adverse outcome 18-fold (HR – 18.24 (5.328 – 62.438); p = 0.001). The duration of hospitalization was significantly lower in the early group than in the late group (10 (8.5 – 15) vs 13.5 (10 – 18) days, respectively; p = 0.02). The mortality was similar (5 (8.2%) vs 6 (5.9%) patients, respectively; p = 0.748). Conclusion. The administration of tocilizumab in the first seven days from the onset of the disease in patients with COVID-19 who developed systemic inflammation and lung damage may prevent the need for escalation of respiratory support and accelerate recovery compared with the later tocilizumab administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonologiya
Pulmonologiya Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to state a scientific position of the Russian Respiratory Society (RRS) on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases based on recent evidence-based clinical trial publications and international consensuses. The most important tasks of the journal are: -improvement proficiency qualifications of respiratory specialists; -education in pulmonology; -prompt publication of original studies on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases; -sharing clinical experience and information about pulmonology service organization in different regions of Russia; -information on current protocols, standards and recommendations of international respiratory societies; -discussion and consequent publication Russian consensus documents and announcement of RRS activities; -publication and comments of regulatory documents of Russian Ministry of Health; -historical review of Russian pulmonology development. The scientific concept of the journal includes publication of current evidence-based studies on respiratory medicine and their discussion with the participation of Russian and foreign experts and development of national consensus documents on respiratory medicine. Russian and foreign respiratory specialists including pneumologists, TB specialists, thoracic surgeons, allergists, clinical immunologists, pediatricians, oncologists, physiologists, and therapeutists are invited to publish article in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信